Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I will buy alibaba site  brake kit. 

Only 515$ brake kit + shipping 180$

https://f2rq3.app.goo.gl/?link=https%3A%2F%2Fm.alibaba.com%2Fproduct%2F60567820585%2FTEI-P60-Car-Disc-Brake-Kit.html&apn=com.alibaba.intl.android.apps.poseidon&ibi=com.alibaba.sourcing&isi=503451073&amv=69

 

One set ordered for my friends supra. I will take some pictures when brakes arrived.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...

had a few problems and that is the reason why it takes so long to arrived here.

 

2 packages had to come. one arrived today and tomorrow another one.

TNT is a supplier of packet

 

Disk is 355mm and 6 piston calibers

This kit cost 780 usd.

I will take new picture after all parts has arrived.

20170302_084837.jpg

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...

NM35 brake rotor and pad part numbers ...

Front (for R34 GTT 4-pot calipers - not standard Stagea fronts)
RDA Dimpled Slotted Rotors, 310 x 30mm: Part No. RDA7597D
Project Mu NS400 pads: Part No. F236

Rear (for standard Stagea NM35 rear calipers)
RDA Dimpled Slotted Rotors, 296 x 24mm: Part No. RDA7657D
Project Mu NS400 pads: Part No. R209

In case it saves someone some searching.

Edited by Darkmeat
OCD. Something bad was gonna happen if I didn't.
  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...

Has anyone also upgraded the brake booster and master cylinder?

I been investigating this for the s2 stag with r34gtt calipers etc all round.

Some advise they get softer pedal feel or abs doesn't activate like it used to.

Suggestions i've seen are to go the r34gtt brake booster/master cylinder also, 

however they both quote BM50... So whats the diff? is the booster different?

(the only physical difference looking at pics online seems to be the reservoir)

Cheers,

Pete

My memory is going but I believe when I up graded to GTT brakes I kept the stock M/C and booster which was  fine for the job. When I fitted D2 330mm brakes to the front and GTR brakes to the rear I changed the master cylinder (kept the stock booster IIRC)  to BM57 with no ill effects (pulled up straight at high speeds on the track).

And I'm running 32 GTR rear and ATTKD 330mm/8 piston fronts with the standard booster and master cylinder without pedal issues.

What problem are you trying to solve? Because mushy/long pedals almost always come down to bleeding or sometimes pad break in

Thanks Duncan and Bob.

1-2cm extra pedal travel, a tad soft compared to original.

Previously could just rest / weight of my foot on brake pedal to start pulling up. 

Does the much same after swap, but needs a bit extra pressure applied.

Not triggering abs like used to, which was quite easy previously. 

Doesn't feel spongy/sloppy, pulls up a lot better than original setup.

I've bled all calipers, cleared any air bubbles.

Maybe i do the bleed procedure again. RL, RR, FL, FR

Wish to get it back to where it was with just lightest of pedal push.

Cheers,

Pete

 

My pedal is also soft, using the r33 f+r setup. It's pretty normal for this to happen when using bigger/more pistons.

I was going to get a bm57 like most people do, but for the money i've learnt to live with it.

 

It's up to you, Pete. If it annoys you that much get a bm57, if not just let it go and you'll soon forget about it, till you drive a properly setup car... or a new car :P 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...