Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks for reply. That’s great result. What power it made on what psi? I’m looking for get 8374 iwg or 9180 iwg. But no result I can find.
Search my posts they are all on here including the build thread. 8374 is an incredible turbo for rb26
  • 2 weeks later...
14 minutes ago, WantGTR said:

No dyno sheet but car went 10.8@140mph. First and only pass. 

2018-07-05_07-22-172018-07-05_07-22-44

 

Nice!  To be fair, this is a dyno result thread and posting a time slip but still no dyno sheet makes baby jesus cry.  Very interested to see the delivery of this 

19 minutes ago, Lithium said:

Nice!  To be fair, this is a dyno result thread and posting a time slip but still no dyno sheet makes baby jesus cry.  Very interested to see the delivery of this 

Yes i know. But mph is better than a dyno sheet. Mph doesnt lie.

  • Like 2
10 hours ago, Lithium said:

Nice!  To be fair, this is a dyno result thread and posting a time slip but still no dyno sheet makes baby jesus cry.  Very interested to see the delivery of this 

maybe just let us know how many rpm full boost?

  • 4 weeks later...

Fresh Dyno

1991 GTR
Stock RB26DETT
Garrett GT2860R-7 turbos
Stock R32 dumps, manifolds, etc.
Greddy downpipe
HKS Super Drager Exhaust
Custom hardpipe intakes (AFMs deleted and all inlet rubber changed to 2.5" Al piping)
Tapped a -6AN fitting into stock fuel rail
FIC 850cc injectors
93 Octane Pumpgas (USA)
BCPR7EIX plugs gapped to .025"
Haltech PnP Rev2 (love this! much better than rev1).

20.5 psig + 3 deg of timing over haltech base.

465 whp

 

480738349_Dynocharts.thumb.JPG.e9be757dde2479507cb25333f93566cc.JPG

patrick gtr 7-28-18.pdf

On 7/31/2018 at 7:06 AM, HarrisRacing said:

Fresh Dyno

1991 GTR
Stock RB26DETT
Garrett GT2860R-7 turbos
Stock R32 dumps, manifolds, etc.
Greddy downpipe
HKS Super Drager Exhaust
Custom hardpipe intakes (AFMs deleted and all inlet rubber changed to 2.5" Al piping)
Tapped a -6AN fitting into stock fuel rail
FIC 850cc injectors
93 Octane Pumpgas (USA)
BCPR7EIX plugs gapped to .025"
Haltech PnP Rev2 (love this! much better than rev1).

20.5 psig + 3 deg of timing over haltech base.

465 whp

 

480738349_Dynocharts.thumb.JPG.e9be757dde2479507cb25333f93566cc.JPG

patrick gtr 7-28-18.pdf

RWHP or AWHP?

465 HP seems a little high for a fairly standard 26 on -7's at 20 psi of boost.

Good result none the less!

 

RWHP or AWHP?
465 HP seems a little high for a fairly standard 26 on -7's at 20 psi of boost.
Good result none the less!
 
RWHP.

The car did 384 whp before the stock AFMs cut me off around 17-18 psi...and at 10 psi did about 296 whp. Haltech, cam gears (rolled in about 6 deg of overlap) and intake pipes woke it up. This dyno is pretty dang accurate. Motor runs very well.

Also I just tuned another R32 GTR on stock RB26 on tomei cam gears, 8374 EFR .92 IWG, 6 boost manifold, on pumpgas 93 octane (your 98) and it did 570 whp on 20 psi. Did 636 whp on 23 psi on E30 and ran out of injector. Also on haltech platinum.

Both cars are strong...the -7 car definitely more laggy than the EFR single car though.download_20180806_220847.jpeg
  • Like 1
480kw at 23 psi
 
Dam bald egles  can tune
This is how that car showed up on stock turbos, stock haltech igniton map and a rough (rich) fuel tune at 15-16 psi. However you want to criticize the overall power, the gains in power are undeniable with only a turbo, injectors, fuel setup, and cam gear changes.

20180629_172503.jpeg

Have a mate with the same turbo at 28 psi e85) and only 380kw

the internal gate bw r junk for bulk power  In Australia 

Americans make them sing ( thus the bald eagle comment which after discovering Cletus on YouTube I thought was a compliment) 

  • Like 2
Have a mate with the same turbo at 28 psi e85) and only 380kw
the internal gate bw r junk for bulk power  In Australia 
Americans make them sing ( thus the bald eagle comment which after discovering Cletus on YouTube I thought was a compliment) 
Whoa... there is definitely something wrong with that motor if that's all they got out of an 8374 EFR .92 iwg turbo on a stock RB26! I mean how can the iwg be to blame when it's simply a turbine housing that's still in the range of what most choose on the RB if you still stay external? (Referring to the 1.05).

I thought you were mocking me with the bald eagles comment... no sweat there I have a sense of humor (hell yeah brother).

I'll get some videos of the cars this week for y'all

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
    • And if you have to drill the oil block, then just drill it for 1/4" and tap it BSP and get a 1/8 to 1/4 BSP bush. The Nissan sender will go straight in and the bush will suit the newly tapped hole. And it will be real strong, to boot.
    • No it doesn't. It just needs an ezy-out to pull that broken bit of alloy out of the hole and presto chango - it will be back to being a 1/8" hole tapped NPT. as per @MBS206 recco. That would be for making what you had in alloy, in steel. If you wanted to do just that instead of remote mounting like @Duncan and I have been pushing. A steel fitting would be unbreakable (compared to that tragically skinny little alloy adapter). But remote mounting would almost certainly be 10x better. Small engineering shops abound all over the place. A lathe and 10 minutes of time = 2x six packs.
×
×
  • Create New...