Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Taken from: http://www.leesracing.com/articles/a1.html

Research Octane Number (RON)

is measured under mild conditions and is more important in controlling part throttle knock.

Motor Octane Number (MON)

is measured under more severe conditions and is most important for octane satisfaction at wide open throttle.

Anti-Knock Index (AKI)

is the average of the RON and MON. This is the number posted on the retail gasoline pumps normally indicating 87, 89, or 92 octane. Racing gasoline have AKI's from 100 to 118

Taken from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_rating

The most common type of octane rating worldwide is the Research Octane Number (RON).

Edited by MintR33
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It's up to your car to tell you which fuel it's gonna like best.

For example, i run Caltex Vortex 98 and BP Ultimate. The car runs like a dream on BP but its halfway across the city for me to get a tank, so it doesnt see it much.

Caltex Vortex it runs fine on, no complaints, the knock sensor never shows knock when giving it a bootfull.

Shell Optimax however has given me some cases of knock when booting... alot of people say that optimax is good to reduce knock and shit but i guess it all depends on your car, because it didnt reduce knock on mine.

So just try a fresh tank of them all and decide for yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's up to your car to tell you which fuel it's gonna like best.

For example, i run Caltex Vortex 98 and BP Ultimate. The car runs like a dream on BP but its halfway across the city for me to get a tank, so it doesnt see it much.

Caltex Vortex it runs fine on, no complaints, the knock sensor never shows knock when giving it a bootfull.

Shell Optimax however has given me some cases of knock when booting... alot of people say that optimax is good to reduce knock and shit but i guess it all depends on your car, because it didnt reduce knock on mine.

So just try a fresh tank of them all and decide for yourself.

Hi Justin, where are you located?

:P cheers :dry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

always used bp ultimate around my local, could feel a difference and per tank of gas got further on avg, real numbers

filled in parra @ teh wooly's station as was getting onto empty line thanx to misses picking me up an not gassing up ^^ best tank of fuel ever, best price was packed cuase tehy sell cheaper than everywhere. the fact that shite loads of fuel goes through, "fresher" fuel maybe, less time swishing in tanks with the added station mixers ? eh eitehr way, went the furthest ever, like freakishly better, no a single frigging nock and 200k's to less than half tank, when i get 300k's on avg per tank.

97 s2 stocker with cat back, mod suspension and a quickshift kit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you mean this link??

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...treme&st=20

From SydneyKid

"A/F ratios are based on weight, not volume, hence the need for specific gravity of the fuels.

Moving on...............we have a new project car, an R33GTST that is in need of some TLC. One of the recent upgrades was a Power FC. As most people are aware, the default ignition maps are a little advanced for Optimax, Ultimate or Vortex 98. Not as bad as they used to be for 95 ron fuels, but still a tad. Obviously I will tune it properly eventually , but we have a few mods to go yet and I don’t have the time to tune it multiple times. So the idea was to stick the Power FC in and run it on the default maps for a couple of weeks. On Optimax and Ultimate (didn’t try Vortex) it was reaching knock of 60+ up our usual test hill in 4th gear as logged on the datalogit. The dash warning was also flashing frequently, as it is set for 60, in normal day to day driving around. When the tank was just about empty this week, we filled it up with Optimax Extreme (@ 5 cents a litre more than Optimax). Several runs up the hill and we are not seeing knock over 10. And zero dash warnings in 3 days of normal driving.

Now that is very worthwhile, there is not enough Optimix Extreme around yet for me to tune it exclusively for 100 ron, but it sure will be a useful for the odd track day or run down the ¼.

I will monitor the effects of the ethanol on the fuel lines, o’rings and seals over the next few weeks. The injectors and fuel pump will have to come out shortly so I will check their condition as well. I am not anticipating any problems, but it is still worth checking.

cheers:)"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Justin, where are you located?

;) cheers :happy:

Hey SK,

I'm in Canberra. I havent tried Optimax extreme or whatever the ethanol one is, but the optimax 98RON. I filled up a popular servo in my area so i'm going to assume it was pretty fresh.

I found it strange that i saw knock with it when all i've heard people say is that it will reduce knock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what is knock exactly? keep reading it...

and how do you "see" it? i don't have anything but stock guages in my GTT, actually... car is dead stock besides diff 17" rims and front bumper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your car is stock I see no reason why you cant use any 98 RON fuels. If its modded then probably BP Ultimate is good.

My car is stock I mainly buy Optimax when I have 4 cent discount vouchers from Coles and BI LO or get Ultimate. I run Ultimate every second or third tank anyway.

I also use Mobile 8000 Synergy but very rare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i checked up on optimax extreme on the shell website. On the list of cars that can use it, I couldnt see anything with Skyline on it.....so I might stay away from it for now......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I USE BP ULTIMATE AND GET ABOUT 540KMS OUT OF A TANK AND ALSO GET GREAT PERFORMANCE. I KNOW SHELL'S PREMIUM ONLY HAS 96 OCTANE.

dats damn good....i can only get 420 and dats changing gears at 2 grand

Link to comment
Share on other sites

220-250k's to a FULL tank is doing well on bp ultimate, vortex 98 from popular stations seems the go 400+k's, stuff al back fires and much less overfueling like my car isnt running on the safe map, there are no popular bp servo's in sydneys west, everyone goes the cheaper fuel proly why i can get decent vortex, 4c off aye.

anyways the vortex "seems" to drive better,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats real odd.......

whats the difference between vortex and ultimate performance wise....anyone tried?

im gonna fill up my next tank with vortex...ill see how it goes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats real odd.......

whats the difference between vortex and ultimate performance wise....anyone tried?

im gonna fill up my next tank with vortex...ill see how it goes

well I tried most high octane fuels in my r33, such as Mobil premium, Optimax, Ultimate, And i felt that when i startyed using Vortex98 my car ran alot better, more perfromance, more km's out of a tank, and alot less backfire(hardly any at all). I would strongly reccommend Vortex, but by the looks alot of different people cars run better on a range of fuels. My advise would be to try them all! see how you go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh bro just put fawken good old leaded in there she be right. Car might cough and fart bit ay heh but she be right, then just chuck bit of supercheap carby cleaner through intake every 500k's or so car should run sweet. >_<

Todays prices i think our only choices is to use the 98 octane. I havent noticed difference between BP and vortex

Edited by siiick
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, I was supprised. Its all about flow rather then housing size.  Doing G35-900 Vs ATR45SS-1 Next. 62mm V 61mm. 
    • Of course sometimes you cannot go with the cheaper alternative but I try to weigh it up for the application - am I competing or am I going to the track ten times p/yr. As long as there’s enough information out there to back the cheaper alternative as a good option I’ll go for that.   I’m a bit of a bastard though as it’s my job to reduce costs, particularly on non income generating assets. EUR 500 saved for the diff + EUR 1,000 saved on BC racing over Bilstein and then say EUR 300 versus EUR 600 on an off brand windscreen versus OEM (for example) soon accumulates. I mean, I’m probably gonna put the car in the ditch anyway. Absolutely do not take this as a justification for always buying cheap shitty parts, just a rationale for doing your research and considering what’s necessary for your application.    
    • All the above effort, time, swapping out parts in the dark (i.e. no O2 data). You're literally running in the dark.
    • Looks like both of my cars have pressure switch issues. The R32 GTR has 18 flashes on the ATTESSA controller which is "ETS pressure switch circuit". The 4WD light is intermittent, and often just restarting the car clears it. There is an $300 replacement option https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/285675135148?itmmeta=01HXN3YKRGKQ08GRZ5KFKKZWJT&hash=item428390a0ac:g:6CcAAOSwWxBltMEG so if it becomes a permanent issue and I can confirm that the switch is the issue, i have a solution. The NM35 is reporting C1208, and disconnecting the switch causes the 4WD light to go away. Translating from the Japanese shop manual "when the pressure is reduced to 2.6MPa (377 psi) or less: conduction occurs when the pressure increases to 3.8MPa (550 psi) or less: conduction is present. Reference: • Immediately after the E-TS actuator motor stops, the pressure inside the accumulator is high and there is no continuity." Not sure how good the translation is but from what i can deduce this means the switch is normally closed (NC) and as the pressure builds from 0 to 550 psi the switch stays closed, then opens and 550 psi. As the pressure drops from 550 psi to 377 psi the switch stays open then closes again at 377 psi. Is that how these things work? These pressures are a lot higher than the R32 ("control pressure 0-228 psi") but i'm hoping i can find a generic switch (like they've done for the R32) to use as a replacement. Maybe something like https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/355586397452?epid=1676016964&itmmeta=01HXN534AF22ACTG6TGDDQGEQ7&hash=item52ca99d50c:g:mAEAAOSw8ilmBcMh&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAAA8LtWdNlWHgyJ%2F3cbw25S2A1lde3qBi3fJii4T3lQavCz4kpqiD42SmBa4FocMvXCjcxiowHjb8vZ8%2BWxc53BkHv781tkStSnCDaenfGKC3bIp0keK20dfsn9LoPa3TfqaEmAydqqyKobgTdXsGGzsl%2BRjOVGuD8OIpOv%2B0wMl7aUtHg0iJtojbtzA%2BRS8Xfm8Ufjuvz4niwrqglAXFUbkL6J%2FGuHPeeECZhLBBN3iNM1Swl94Fv5zE95YK%2B5O6dxDN1ySNOjdMxkA8yaprbuwRHFQv1nlGh%2FWjekj6EUFR2%2FO4HTsoKtSAkY0Mj1w1uf1w%3D%3D|tkp%3ABk9SR6zFjKXtYw but with a lower close pressure, and thread adapter if required. Am i dreaming?
×
×
  • Create New...