Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I believe the answer can be found in where the main focus is for each vehicle when it comes to competition. Look at where the SR is mainly used for track work vs where the RB is mainly used [not all the time, there are exceptions in every rule, but mainly]. Long and short circuit, drift, drags etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048318
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

SR's used mainly for track... what about the sr 2 to 1 ratio of drift cars at nearly every drift event.

I prefer RB's because they have the potential to make more power. But sometimes I really wish Nissan got their act together and produced alloy blocks to reduce the weight factor up front.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048438
Share on other sites

pfttttt. sr20 FTL. when you seem them stripped down you know why there not as good. (from an engineering point of view) rockers that break,blocks that warp with a stud kit in them,single row chain thats not the greatest,good torque but not to revvy and an abundance of machining errors that cause oil leaks.

but thay work lol.

a built 20 would be my kind of engine,vs a built sr20. there just abit more tricky to get rite.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048533
Share on other sites

SR's a ghastly designed cheaply made bag of characterless sounding tat but it is undoubtedly torquey.

I personally wouldn't pick a SR over a CA for a road/track car and I personally prefer the RB25/26 in a S13 to either of them.

Re: the RS13 with a RB handling comments. We get this all the time on the UK SXOC. "The weight distribution is all wrong blah blah". Haven't cornerweighted my own car yet but I have seen cornerweight figures from another RB25 powered RS13 and although overall weight is obviously up weight distribution-wise they have a very similar f/r split to a S14 with a SR20DET.

They actually handle very well but theres definitely a wrong way and a right way to build them and set them up. I've been lucky enough to compare mine to a few others over here and the difference in handling was very noticeable.

When set up properly a RB up front actually adds some much needed feel to the steering and improves front end grip. Mine is noticeably less understeerey in the wet and dry on road and track than its identically suspensioned CA-powered sister car.

IMHO the RB really suits the 13, shame Nissan didn't have the balls to do one themselves. :thumbsup:

Edited by mambastu
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048587
Share on other sites

I'd take the rb20 every time purely for the sound. The noise is very important if its a road going car and I want to enjoy the experience. I still stand by that the rb20 is the best sounding rb ever.

Edited by Rolls
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048765
Share on other sites

The RB20 is inferior in stock form but $ for $ modding an RB will give you better performance all round. and as many have said RB's stroke allows them to rev and that's what you need with a bigger turbo.

you have to look at what is best for you.

RB is best for me...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048824
Share on other sites

The RB20 is inferior in stock form but $ for $ modding an RB will give you better performance all round. and as many have said RB's stroke allows them to rev and that's what you need with a bigger turbo.

you have to look at what is best for you.

RB is best for me...

How can you say its inferior in stock form? What do std turbo S13/14s make at the wheels? My point is a motor will only be as good as the gear Nissan gave it at the factory. In which case look at the R31 GTSR. There are RB20 with std turbo and intercoolers making 250rwkws :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048911
Share on other sites

pfttttt. sr20 FTL. when you seem them stripped down you know why there not as good. (from an engineering point of view) rockers that break,blocks that warp with a stud kit in them,single row chain thats not the greatest,good torque but not to revvy and an abundance of machining errors that cause oil leaks.

but thay work lol.

a built 20 would be my kind of engine,vs a built sr20. there just abit more tricky to get rite.

of all the years ive been in the silvia scene, i only know of 1 broken rocker. whats wrong with the chain drive ?!

not surprisingly there is alot of bias here :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3049018
Share on other sites

mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm RB20.....revs and engine note get me there :D

Not a fan of the SR, engine note sucks the wang and id rather have a tough as guts FJ20.

Good to see someone compared an RB30 to a 2JZ......always good to compare an engine origionally designed as a diesel to an over engineered freak :)

*Wheezy watches the pot stir

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3049172
Share on other sites

It's simple, SR's have rockers...

:) cheers :)

not all of them do :D hehe ok, all the longitudinal ones do. but happines is just an RNN14 head away.

trent: I don't really know the gun SR shops in melb. but you would want someone who knows there shit installing liners that big. I'm guessing they will need to be frozen too and maybe the block heated in an oil bath and they may go in without too much hassle.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3049189
Share on other sites

not all of them do :D hehe ok, all the longitudinal ones do. but happines is just an RNN14 head away.

trent: I don't really know the gun SR shops in melb. but you would want someone who knows there shit installing liners that big. I'm guessing they will need to be frozen too and maybe the block heated in an oil bath and they may go in without too much hassle.

Every SR20 has rockers, GTiR use solid lifters rather then hydrlic (spelling). I dont see the big drama with rockers unless you want to rev over 9000. They have benifites like you can fit massive cams with no modification to head etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3049213
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...