Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I believe the answer can be found in where the main focus is for each vehicle when it comes to competition. Look at where the SR is mainly used for track work vs where the RB is mainly used [not all the time, there are exceptions in every rule, but mainly]. Long and short circuit, drift, drags etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048318
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

SR's used mainly for track... what about the sr 2 to 1 ratio of drift cars at nearly every drift event.

I prefer RB's because they have the potential to make more power. But sometimes I really wish Nissan got their act together and produced alloy blocks to reduce the weight factor up front.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048438
Share on other sites

pfttttt. sr20 FTL. when you seem them stripped down you know why there not as good. (from an engineering point of view) rockers that break,blocks that warp with a stud kit in them,single row chain thats not the greatest,good torque but not to revvy and an abundance of machining errors that cause oil leaks.

but thay work lol.

a built 20 would be my kind of engine,vs a built sr20. there just abit more tricky to get rite.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048533
Share on other sites

SR's a ghastly designed cheaply made bag of characterless sounding tat but it is undoubtedly torquey.

I personally wouldn't pick a SR over a CA for a road/track car and I personally prefer the RB25/26 in a S13 to either of them.

Re: the RS13 with a RB handling comments. We get this all the time on the UK SXOC. "The weight distribution is all wrong blah blah". Haven't cornerweighted my own car yet but I have seen cornerweight figures from another RB25 powered RS13 and although overall weight is obviously up weight distribution-wise they have a very similar f/r split to a S14 with a SR20DET.

They actually handle very well but theres definitely a wrong way and a right way to build them and set them up. I've been lucky enough to compare mine to a few others over here and the difference in handling was very noticeable.

When set up properly a RB up front actually adds some much needed feel to the steering and improves front end grip. Mine is noticeably less understeerey in the wet and dry on road and track than its identically suspensioned CA-powered sister car.

IMHO the RB really suits the 13, shame Nissan didn't have the balls to do one themselves. :thumbsup:

Edited by mambastu
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048587
Share on other sites

I'd take the rb20 every time purely for the sound. The noise is very important if its a road going car and I want to enjoy the experience. I still stand by that the rb20 is the best sounding rb ever.

Edited by Rolls
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048765
Share on other sites

The RB20 is inferior in stock form but $ for $ modding an RB will give you better performance all round. and as many have said RB's stroke allows them to rev and that's what you need with a bigger turbo.

you have to look at what is best for you.

RB is best for me...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048824
Share on other sites

The RB20 is inferior in stock form but $ for $ modding an RB will give you better performance all round. and as many have said RB's stroke allows them to rev and that's what you need with a bigger turbo.

you have to look at what is best for you.

RB is best for me...

How can you say its inferior in stock form? What do std turbo S13/14s make at the wheels? My point is a motor will only be as good as the gear Nissan gave it at the factory. In which case look at the R31 GTSR. There are RB20 with std turbo and intercoolers making 250rwkws :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3048911
Share on other sites

pfttttt. sr20 FTL. when you seem them stripped down you know why there not as good. (from an engineering point of view) rockers that break,blocks that warp with a stud kit in them,single row chain thats not the greatest,good torque but not to revvy and an abundance of machining errors that cause oil leaks.

but thay work lol.

a built 20 would be my kind of engine,vs a built sr20. there just abit more tricky to get rite.

of all the years ive been in the silvia scene, i only know of 1 broken rocker. whats wrong with the chain drive ?!

not surprisingly there is alot of bias here :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3049018
Share on other sites

mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm RB20.....revs and engine note get me there :D

Not a fan of the SR, engine note sucks the wang and id rather have a tough as guts FJ20.

Good to see someone compared an RB30 to a 2JZ......always good to compare an engine origionally designed as a diesel to an over engineered freak :)

*Wheezy watches the pot stir

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3049172
Share on other sites

It's simple, SR's have rockers...

:) cheers :)

not all of them do :D hehe ok, all the longitudinal ones do. but happines is just an RNN14 head away.

trent: I don't really know the gun SR shops in melb. but you would want someone who knows there shit installing liners that big. I'm guessing they will need to be frozen too and maybe the block heated in an oil bath and they may go in without too much hassle.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3049189
Share on other sites

not all of them do :D hehe ok, all the longitudinal ones do. but happines is just an RNN14 head away.

trent: I don't really know the gun SR shops in melb. but you would want someone who knows there shit installing liners that big. I'm guessing they will need to be frozen too and maybe the block heated in an oil bath and they may go in without too much hassle.

Every SR20 has rockers, GTiR use solid lifters rather then hydrlic (spelling). I dont see the big drama with rockers unless you want to rev over 9000. They have benifites like you can fit massive cams with no modification to head etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164380-sau-v-ns/page/2/#findComment-3049213
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...