Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I went to the 'Dyno B' and got my car

dyno'd. Except i only got about 163rwkw 'Dyno B', unlike 193rwkw which i got at 'Dyno A'.

The guys at 'Dyno B' said that peak power dropped off at about 5000rpm, when it actually

should still be increasing. The only thing i have changed since the first dyno was, i installed a S/S

inlet pipe between AFM & turbo.

The power curve was fine at 'Dyno A'. Have you ever come across this before?

Both dyno runs showed good AFR's.

What would be the more appropriate power output figure for my current mods.

Mods:-

1993 R32 Skyline

RB20DET

Stock internals

5-speed manual

R33 S1 turbo

Trust front mount intercooler

Full exhaust (Split 3' dump/front pipe)

GTR fuel pump

Boost controller running at 14psi

Re-mapped ECU

Air pod

S/S inlet pipe

Edited by lows_13
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/166491-power-figure-issue/
Share on other sites

163rwkw sounds realistic

lots of things can affect the readouts, post both dyno sheets

one could have air temp correction, the other might not

one could be in a different gear or different ramp rate etc

Dynos can be calibrated differently therefore showing that some cars have less powerful then they do on a different dyno. The stainless steel intake pipe shouldn't have made any difference as the only problem i've heard of is with the stock plastic one contracting under suction and limiting air flow so if anything the s/s one should be better. my suggestion would be to go back to dyno A and get a re-run on that

most Rb20's with the 25 turbos make any where from 160 to 180 ish rwkw, even more if they are pushed to 14 psi. but for the sake of it we'll assume 12 or so psi.

dont be too fussed about different dyno reads out tho, does the car feel any different on road compared to both dynos?

maybe the stainless inlet pipe has made your car slower/less powerful? I mean if that's the only thing you've changed and your power has gone down... how does it feel to you?

maybe the stainless inlet pipe has made your car slower/less powerful? I mean if that's the only thing you've changed and your power has gone down... how does it feel to you?

Power feels about the same after the S/S inlet mod.

Theres a lot more turbo sucking sound, thats about it.

The ambient temps clearly show the 2 runs weren't done on the same day, probably not even the same month! Is it any wonder then that you encountered differences. Although I would expect the colder day to produce better power.

Are both dynos the same model? Same manufacturer?

They say that each 3 degree increase in intake air temp makes a 1% reduction in power.

So for a 20 degree (at least) increase in temp thats probably 8% power just there, compounded by the hotter air going through the intercooler...

So more like 10-15% power drop from increased temp and your getting to be in the same ballpark kW reading.

Rhett

  • 3 months later...

im going with the 160 mark because near on 200kw? on 14psi with a tiny 2lt engine?? hahah no chance... not with a standard r33 turbo.. ive driven one of those b4 and damn they are torqueless and slow :rofl: sorry dude but theres no chance urs makin near on 200rwkw

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Try looking at Eibacb/H&R springs Thats what Gary sourced for mine.
    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
×
×
  • Create New...