Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I went to the 'Dyno B' and got my car

dyno'd. Except i only got about 163rwkw 'Dyno B', unlike 193rwkw which i got at 'Dyno A'.

The guys at 'Dyno B' said that peak power dropped off at about 5000rpm, when it actually

should still be increasing. The only thing i have changed since the first dyno was, i installed a S/S

inlet pipe between AFM & turbo.

The power curve was fine at 'Dyno A'. Have you ever come across this before?

Both dyno runs showed good AFR's.

What would be the more appropriate power output figure for my current mods.

Mods:-

1993 R32 Skyline

RB20DET

Stock internals

5-speed manual

R33 S1 turbo

Trust front mount intercooler

Full exhaust (Split 3' dump/front pipe)

GTR fuel pump

Boost controller running at 14psi

Re-mapped ECU

Air pod

S/S inlet pipe

Edited by lows_13
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/166491-power-figure-issue/
Share on other sites

163rwkw sounds realistic

lots of things can affect the readouts, post both dyno sheets

one could have air temp correction, the other might not

one could be in a different gear or different ramp rate etc

Dynos can be calibrated differently therefore showing that some cars have less powerful then they do on a different dyno. The stainless steel intake pipe shouldn't have made any difference as the only problem i've heard of is with the stock plastic one contracting under suction and limiting air flow so if anything the s/s one should be better. my suggestion would be to go back to dyno A and get a re-run on that

most Rb20's with the 25 turbos make any where from 160 to 180 ish rwkw, even more if they are pushed to 14 psi. but for the sake of it we'll assume 12 or so psi.

dont be too fussed about different dyno reads out tho, does the car feel any different on road compared to both dynos?

maybe the stainless inlet pipe has made your car slower/less powerful? I mean if that's the only thing you've changed and your power has gone down... how does it feel to you?

maybe the stainless inlet pipe has made your car slower/less powerful? I mean if that's the only thing you've changed and your power has gone down... how does it feel to you?

Power feels about the same after the S/S inlet mod.

Theres a lot more turbo sucking sound, thats about it.

The ambient temps clearly show the 2 runs weren't done on the same day, probably not even the same month! Is it any wonder then that you encountered differences. Although I would expect the colder day to produce better power.

Are both dynos the same model? Same manufacturer?

They say that each 3 degree increase in intake air temp makes a 1% reduction in power.

So for a 20 degree (at least) increase in temp thats probably 8% power just there, compounded by the hotter air going through the intercooler...

So more like 10-15% power drop from increased temp and your getting to be in the same ballpark kW reading.

Rhett

  • 3 months later...

im going with the 160 mark because near on 200kw? on 14psi with a tiny 2lt engine?? hahah no chance... not with a standard r33 turbo.. ive driven one of those b4 and damn they are torqueless and slow :rofl: sorry dude but theres no chance urs makin near on 200rwkw

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, long time no post as per usual! It's been a busy year so far, the biggest thing being a new job.  After 28 years in the automotive industry I decided it was time for a change.  I was losing faith in the industry and where it's heading.  Now in a completely different industry (electrical) working for a company that manufacture water pump contollers.  Not as sexy as cars but it's an interesting,  challenging industry. I now don't work Saturdays which is a bonus!  It's still 50-55 hours a week but having Saturdays ack after 28 years of working them is awesome!   No news on the GT-R but i did decide to add some more JDM goodness into my life....           1990 300 ZX.  She's not perfect but for a 35 year old car she ain't bad!  Just going to tidy it up a bit and enjoy it.  It's currently auto but will start stockpiling everything for a manual swap. It WILL distract me even further from the GT-R but im hoping not for too long! It somewhat proves a 6'8" freak can fit in a 300 ZX.  Sort of...  I drove it home from the previous owners house in Melbourne via Black Spur and Merton Gap (2 awesome bits of Victorian twisty road) and it was amazing!  Handles so well!!!   I don't think it would be worthy of a full build page but I'll post up some of the upgrades here if anyone is interested?  Cheers guys!
    • End game is to: - Remove all the slop from old worn parts - Adjust setup so that the wheels actually fit and the car is drivable (currently it is not because of the extreme rubbing on the guards).   Progress over the last couple of days, removed the rear hubs! Next steps: - Buy bushings - Replace bushings/bearings on hub - Reinstall
    • Cracked deck  And other cam snap stuff   
    • A few random issues have popped up since my last update. My WMI pressure sensor failed within about 10 minutes of it seeing liquid. It was a 20$ China special, so I'm not surprised. My name brand replacement should arrive today.  My power steering assist also decided to crap out last weekend. The usual, works for about 60 seconds after starting the car then I lose it. I dusted off my old copy of NDS and connected to the HICAS ECU. Code 4 for assist solenoid.... I tested the solenoid and it's fine.  I knew the day where my HICAS ecu would crap out would come, and I welcome it. It was the last HICAS part on the car that is now in the bin. I've ordered an SSR and I will control the power steering solenoid with my Haltech ecu. It will be nice to have proper speed referenced assist again after all these years.   
×
×
  • Create New...