Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I still seem to be the anomaly here.

Driving to Canberra and back the lowest tank for me was 8L/100km.

Maybe it's because I don't usually use the aircon?

Awesome figures Jase! The only time I had better economy was with the Fcon in and a long trip up the Hume Hwy.

No chance I could get that with just the standard ecu. Are you running a remapped ecu and rwd with very skinny tyres at insane psi or something?

Screw you all!!! According to the stats I've been gathering, I'm averaging 14.87l/100kms. :(

I've got a full exhaust, FMIC, PowerFC and a GReddy EBC - must be the short trips and heavy right foot. I don't speed anywhere, but I love the feeling of acceleration, so that's killing my fuel economy.

Awesome figures Jase! The only time I had better economy was with the Fcon in and a long trip up the Hume Hwy.

No chance I could get that with just the standard ecu. Are you running a remapped ecu and rwd with very skinny tyres at insane psi or something?

That was on Potenzas. They were pumped up at the time but nothing ridiculous.

Only mod that I believe may have made a difference to fuel economy is the runner spacer. Ever since I chucked that in it seems more than happy to sit in 5th/overdrive from about 70kmh and up. Actually seems to have a lot more torque from say 70kmh to 90kmh than before.

Is there any way I can tell if this needs doing? I'd rather not drop $250 "just to see".

Disconnect it & use up a tankfull, see if any change?

______________

Here's stats from 3 fill ups on my C34 S1- stock everything except no cat. 'Z' 95 fuel.

05/03/12: 10.72/100km

08/03/12: 9.96/100km... first time ever getting into 9's

13/03/12: 10.6/100km... this one is the most common result

  • 1 month later...

My 34 S1 RS Four stock everything except no cat, burns about 20-23 L/ 100 km in city, and about 15-16 L / 100 km on highway. 95 fuel. I drive not faster than 110 km/h, but I like to speed up by pressing the gas pedal to the floor. Our fuel is terrible, so If I tucked your petrol, consumption would be less.

Edited by muratti

I still have the same o2 sensor in from when i bought the car. Still get 600k's before fuel light comes on. Still give it beans most days. Car is now @ 308,232klms.

NEVER buy Matilda fuel. It was PULP but found performance was down and only got 450klms to a full tank. Shell 98 all the time, everytime for me.

Edit: I totally forgot to say - At 180,000 k's I did pull the o2 sensor out. I put it in a small tub of fuel and used a new paint brush to clean the sensor tip, in through the little slits too.

Edited by Jezboosted

Is there any way I can tell if this needs doing? I'd rather not drop $250 "just to see".

EDIT: Wait, you have a VQ. You could be right on the price.

Edited by Cowboy1600
  • 3 weeks later...

I got 12.47l/100km on my very first tank with quite a bit of spirited driving, was testing the car out when i just got it.

Then 11.3l/100km on my second tank, these are with 85% suburban driving. :rolleyes:

Only mod is a cat-back but on a manual hence the low figures?

Just filled my S1 manual RB30/25. I have been driving normally - changing up at 2 -2500 revs, the odd boost on the motorway and it took 62.65 L for 448km so about 14L per 100km (mostly short trips less than 10km - four or five about twice that).

71 litres for 570 odd km's. Getting on for 150,00 km's mileage now. Have cat fuel filter fitted but seems to make little difference. Upwards of 200 km's on first quarter tank, open highway, promised much but failed to follow through in city driving. I expected better combined based on past performance.

BTW: MY rank should be VQ25DET, to whom that matters.

Edited by STAG250

I'm monitoring my fuel consumption following the road tune. It seems quite reasonalble concidering the changes I have made. Its hard to measure properly, because the Mrs trips are not long, but I'll have a crack.

Staqg250 - your Rank is based upon your post count. You start as a RB20e then progress ir RB20de, det, RB25de, det etc etc up to RB26dett with something like 10,000 posts.

A few of us smart cookies just changed it to something more suitable for M35 owners.... :P

Ok finally had a gentle driving week in my car and I've come back with 13.4l/100km, all highway. Alot higher then it used to be before the tune but with low level mods it's probably about right.

  • 2 weeks later...

I've gone back to Shell 98 octane and I am getting far better fuel economy now than when I was running Caltex Vortex 98. Last time I let the tank get down to near empty I had done 500km, and it took 61L to fill the tank. Now after a few tanks of the Shell fuel, I was on 275km at a half tank of fuel before I filled up this morning. I mostly drive country roads/highway going to and from work here in Canberra, all the while in the midst of the daily tradie grand prix.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...