Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys and Gals,

I thought I'd chuck together a thread where everyone can post up the brake pads they have used and what they thought of them. I'll try and keep a summary up in this 1st thread as a quick glance resource. I'll list the pads as people post them up under three headings as either track only pads, track/street pads or steet only pads. For the summary I'll do a simple :) next to the pad name if people like them or a :) followed by a reason if people don't like them. Also if people can list where they got the pads from that would be great too. If you want anything else added let me know.

Track Pads

EBC Green :) (poor performance and taper wear)

EBC Yellow - OK but not as good as DS3000's

Ferodo DS3000 :)smile.gifsmile.gif

Ferodo DS2500 :) (rears) :) (crumble with hard use)

Performance Friction Carbon Metallic :P

SBS Dual Carbon :)

Track/Street Pads

Bendix Ultiamtes smile.gifsmile.gif (Light track work)

EBC Green - OK But not as good as DS2500's

Endless SSS smile.gif

Ferodo DS2500 smile.gif

Queensland Friction Materials (QFM) A1.RM (front+rear) smile.gifsmile.gif

SBS Ceramic Carbon :)

Street Pads

Bendix Ultiamtes smile.gif

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/169972-brake-pads-users-ratings-guide/
Share on other sites

I'll start my own thread then :P

I currently use in my GT-R Ferodo DS3000 pads in the fronts and DS2500 in the rears. I think they are great. Can get a little noisy if I haven't done much hard driving but after one good session become quiet again rather quickly. For me I love the progressive bite - but they will bite hard given a firm press. I get mine from John @ UAS and would highly recommend them for a track set-up.

cool.

ds3000 good feel ,consistant, used on v8 brutes. the discs crack before they break up.

ds2500 pretty average not very bity. and crumble with hard use. (since 3000 came along) but once warm ok.

ebc green. garbage and extreem taperd ware.

sbc ceramic carbon. awsome street/track pad. long lasting and dont overheat the disc. my pic for steet/track

sbc duel carbon. very good aswell. more track orientated. long lasting and take an awfull lot of heat. (targa favorite)

performance friction carbon metalic.

omg insane pad. so easy to use and instant pedal responce. my pic of the list. but due to the fact that they work so well you cant tell your overheating the discs. cos they feel the same from warm to a orange hot disc. (as used in most top level motorsport. nascar,v8 supercars etc etc)

bendix ultimate,ferodo formula,metal kings etc etc. pretty crap and good for going up to the shops.

i haved used all these pads in my gtr with 355mm rotors and brembo f40's (38,44mm pistons) and im hard on brakes. once you get good brakes you seem to explore there limmits hehe

  • 2 weeks later...

I've been using factory pads so far and they are working fine, no fad. Have just brought some new Bendix Street Road Track to see if I can shortern the distance down a bit. But very impressed with factory brakes!

This topic is a good idea, pity about the lack of response.

Anyway, I've had good results when doing sprints at QR, Sprint circuit, with Bendix Ultimates. Great bang for buck but not a race pad. So thinking of EBC Yellow stuffs, which are supposed to work cold too. My big concern is rotor wear, but seeing noone uses them.............

Using RB74 front and rear pads. Stock rear dics and 4000 series (non-slotted) fronts on R33 GTSt.

Good pad, warm up in one average stop first thing in the morning, can be very noisy if you don't grease the shims properly. Definately better than Nissan pads that seem to leave material on the disc after hard driving (makes discs feel temporarily warped)

Been used around QR and seemed fine and dandy. But I've only got 170rwkw.

my 2c - some of this is second hand tho

DS3000s - high friction 0.62 so very grippy - works well at high temp - tough on rotors (maybe only at low temps tho) - manufacturer says "NOT suitable for road use", presumably because of the rotor wear issue

EBC Yellows - quite like DS3000 - similar price so you might as well use the better DS3000s

DS2500s - med friction 0.5 so not as grippy as DS3000s - dont eat rotors - good for track and street

EBC Reds - quite like DS2500s - similar price so you might as well use the better wearing DS2500s

EBC greens - med friction 0.55 - everyone says they're crap but they worked ok for me on street and light track work

You should use pads of the same friction coefficient front and rear unless you want to change the brake bias.

what are people's thoughts on the endless sss or ssm pads? looking to get these sometime soon. 90% street work, the rest on twisties or track.

Recommended...

I've been running the SSS pads for a lil while now. For what you've said you'll be using them for - low noise, low dust and still good after 4 laps of Sandown...

In my time with the 34 I used:

Endless Euro-X (front) and Endless NA-R (rear)

Great for track, no fade after 5 laps, but poor pedal feel and noisy when cold so not the best for street. These are now old parts replaced by newer Endless pads.

Bendix Heavy Duty (front)

Put in as a stop-gap measure cos my front pads were too low before a track day. These pads were crap for my application, poor pedal feel on the street, dusty, wore quickly, faded after 2 laps but didn't go away completely.

Queensland Friction Materials (QFM) A1.RM (front+rear)

Good compromise pad for those on a budget. Good street feel from cold. Good performance on the track with only a slight fade on lap 5. Kind to rotors, low on dust, and cheap, ~$120 per pair (about 1/3 the price I paid for Endless).

I should mention what really helped was also:

- decent fluid (Endless fluid or Motul Factory Line)

- decent rotors (basic upgrade to DBA/RDA slotted rotors of stock diameters)

- cooling (cutting away the guard plastic in front of the front wheels to allow airflow, removal of dust plates)

- braided lines front and rear

- master cylinder brace

- proper bleeding procedure

Im using the SSS 500 deg front and 380 deg for rear for almost 1 year. Been on a lot of twisties all year round and does mostly street. No noise at all and quite low brake dust with plenty of bite. Though some ppl use them find them to be squeky on low speed though i haven't experienced this before.

Any price is acceptable and gonna change the pad in 2 months time.

Dunno how I missed this thead til now.

Snowy, what's the reasoning behind DS3000 front and DS2500 rear?

I have used:

Bendix advance - as dave says, fine for going up to the shops.

Bendix Ultimates - Nice and bitey, better than advance, chew through rotors like a fat man munching down on an old twix, wear out quickly, dusty, can be noisy.

Ferrodo DS2500 - long wearing, heat rotors pretty badly making it very easy to crack them, don't chew them though, cheap for performance pads, can be used on the street although an emergency stop when dead cold wont be too great, don't need much heat to negate this at all though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...