Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 233
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Haines.

This is Wife of Bass Junky.

I can't find him anywhere, but I did see a plane ticket to Rio somewhere :(

Hey Guys,

Current payment situation with confirmed receipts is as follows.

R32 GTS-T

1 glendon.......................Blue..............PAID

2 vsute..........................Black............PAID

3 Haysey........................???

4 SNISMO......................Blue

5

R33 GTS-T

1 wolverine...................Black Paid

2 R33Driftr....................Blue Paid

3 beastien.....................Blue Paid

4 dOOdz.......................Black Paid

5 Fry_33.......................Black Paid

6 (B1) Mr Fanny.............???? Paid

7 johnnilicte..................Black Paid

8 MANWHORE................Black Paid

9 Gtshortie....................Black Paid

10 Mearcat....................???? Paid

11 Sydneykid.................Blue Paid

12 tuitahi.......................Black Paid

13 Shano3000................Black Paid

14 siddr20 ????? Paid

15 damuscat Black Paid

16 onthehunt..................Black Paid

17 FLYSLY.......................Blue Paid

18 zebra.........................Blue

19 SoFly.........................Black

20 Govich.......................Black

21 RSTME.......................Black

22 teazn_r33...................Blue

23 russo1........................Black

24 r33_nikolas ?????

25 Race__24....................Black

26 Skyhy.........................Blue

27 Taxi33.........................Black

28 frx026.........................Black

29 WogsRus.....................Blue

30 0I_Mate.......................Black

R34 GTT

1 Bass Junky.......................Black...............Paid

2 Wolverine.........................Black...............Paid

3 Haines..............................Black...............Paid

4 Black_Widow R34..............Black...............Paid

5 so_tred.............................Black...............Paid

6 joe26f...............................????................Paid

7 J34....................................Black..............Paid

8 Darrinspencer....................Blue................Paid

9 Brycey...............................Black..............Paid

10 chuckie..............................Blue

11 Marc2................................Black.............Paid

12 oxford1327.........................????..............Paid

13 nightcrawler........................Black.............Paid

Come on guys who haven't yet paid, or told me when they are paying (mostly this weekend) let get those payments in so that we can get moving with the group buy.

BASS OUT

Edited by Bass Junky

Hey Guys....

Who banks in Cannington..... Carousel Centre?

PM me if its you.... Problem with payment.

Cheers

Pete

Toasty.

Most turbos which bolt onto the stock manifold will work fine with this pipe.

Small modifications are easy to the silicone with a blade and you can always turn it on the snout or twist it a little to suit.

Group buy closing soon.

People who haven't yet paid please let me know your thoughts, if you have already told me about your payment, stick to the plan and all is good.

Let finalise those payments and I'll get them ordered. Remember, I can't buy for you if you haven't yet paid me.

BASS OUT

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...