Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi everyone im just wondering what car would be good for a beginner wanting to start doing some track days and circuit racing and stuff like that, only because im hugely interested in this and ive been saving alot of money. ive been thinking of turbo but im not quite sure yet only because im still on my p's for another year. now im writing in the n/a forum because im thinking what an N/A r34 would be like on the track either the 2 door or 4 door, only problem is i seem to mainly find 4 door r34's are they still any good? anyway any info on these would be much appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185448-good-beginners-track-car/
Share on other sites

Depends on what sort of "track" wrok you planning on doing, drift, hill climb, Motorkahna.... All different. And different cars are better suited to different things.

For eg, my AE86 is great at the hillclimbs and motorkahna. But it's not legal for the IPRA races as a few of the mods aren't allowed.

So pick a class or a type of event you want to compete in, then build a car to the rules far that class or competion

shitty old ae86 you pick up for 500 bucks with a welded diff.

if you can find an AE86 for $500, let me know..... as the last time I saw a shitty rusted AE86 cheap, it was 2g..................

PLus an AE86 isn't as easy to drive as everybody thinks

if you can find an AE86 for $500, let me know..... as the last time I saw a shitty rusted AE86 cheap, it was 2g..................

PLus an AE86 isn't as easy to drive as everybody thinks

bought mine for $600, even had a japanese rear axle, disc brakes and japanese headlight conversion (including foglight brackets) already done. Not much rust either, just a couple of spots. Welded the diff and for shits and giggles we strapped a turbo onto the 4AC carby engine and took it to a drift night. No power steering = pussy drifting. Once we blew the engine we found another 4AC, changed engines in about 40 mins and it cost us a beer and $20 for the engine. We went thru 4 engines in that car... finally decided to put a CA18 in it.

its doable, just gotta look in the right places... and not get into a price war with fanboys.

coincidentally I just sold the same car without an engine or gearbox for $1000. $400 profit about 5 events and 2 years later :dry:

hi everyone im just wondering what car would be good for a beginner wanting to start doing some track days and circuit racing and stuff like that

OK, you need to decide if this car is going to be for track days only, or if you're going to race it competitively. The latter has a whole bunch of rules and restrictions which will determine the car you select (most turbos get the shit restricted out of them). The former would probably be restricted only by your budget.

Next thing, is it going to be a track-only car trailered to events or is it something you need to be able to drive around on the road?

The R34, or almost any 2WD Skyline for that matter, is a boat. The car's set up too soft from the factory because its engineered to be a GT, not a racer. You can throw money at it to "fix" it, but you might be better off just buying a car that's better suited.

Lastly, what is your budget?

Cars I'd consider, in your situation:

S13 Silvia

Mazda MX5

Honda Integra Type-R (DC2)

Honda Civic VTiR

All are relatively light and chuckable, with a reasonable chassis, and most aren't stupidly powerful. Having a car that's not too powerful means you need to learn how to corner if you want to run a good time, since you can't make it up on the straights.

Arguably, if you really want to use it for "learning" only you should buy something that doesn't handle as well as the above. If you can drive a bad handling car with no power quick, you can drive a good handling car with no power very quick. And a good handling car with power extremely quick.

thanks for all your posts guys i appreciate it. to answer a couple things you guys wrote is that im not after a full track car just something for track days because i want to get into circuit racing. so what im after is something you can take to the track to learn the basics and still will be my everyday driver car to work, so thats why im not after a full stripped out hardcore racecar. so id do some suspension work and probably brakes and stuff like that nothing major just something to learn in, when i get the job i want i can move into some more circuit racing and dedicate a car just to that and by then i should know the basics.

If I was in your situation I'd probably try and get an R32 or S13 Silvia / 180sx. Unfortunately you'd have to get a non-turbo due to the P plater laws if this was going to be a daily driver as well though. You can pick up non-turbos of the cars mentioned fairly cheaply these days, even cheaper if you decide to buy them from Japan..

Although it would be up to you, I'd stay away from the four door R34's.. as stated before the Skylines are a bigger car and aren't as suited to track from the factory as others (except the R32 imo). You'd save money getting an R32 / S13 and then can use that money to put towards upgrading suspension and mods.

thanks for all your posts guys i appreciate it. to answer a couple things you guys wrote is that im not after a full track car just something for track days because i want to get into circuit racing. so what im after is something you can take to the track to learn the basics and still will be my everyday driver car to work, so thats why im not after a full stripped out hardcore racecar. so id do some suspension work and probably brakes and stuff like that nothing major just something to learn in, when i get the job i want i can move into some more circuit racing and dedicate a car just to that and by then i should know the basics.

Just use whatever car you're driving now. Best way to get into motorsport is just start doing it. You'll learn and have fun in whatever you're driving.

The R34, or almost any 2WD Skyline for that matter, is a boat. The car's set up too soft from the factory because its engineered to be a GT, not a racer. You can throw money at it to "fix" it, but you might be better off just buying a car that's better suited.

Lastly, what is your budget?

Cars I'd consider, in your situation:

S13 Silvia

Mazda MX5

Honda Integra Type-R (DC2)

Honda Civic VTiR

All are relatively light and chuckable, with a reasonable chassis, and most aren't stupidly powerful. Having a car that's not too powerful means you need to learn how to corner if you want to run a good time, since you can't make it up on the straights.

I drive a R34 4 door and even I agree with all of the above comments from people. Sure you can make up for weight with power, but you're far better off not having it in the first place

How bout a ae86 Sprinter.. One of the best track cars around .. sure its more of a drifta but if u wanna convert ur set..

Id also concider a mx5 turbo .. or a s13 silvia.. not a 180.. to hard to hold in a corner i rekon

Edited by DECIM8

to be honest - my excel is a blast to drive after a bit of suspension work

i would recommend some g4 coilovers, bigger rear swaybar, front strut brace, full bush replacement

get some decent tyres on some hyundai elantra 15" steel rims and your laughing

okay its not fast, but they're chuckable around corners and the understeer is progressive after the suspension mods

Sure you can make up for weight with power, but you're far better off not having it in the first place

You can make up for weight with power coming out of a corner and onto the straight. Once you get to the end of the straight and need to brake, or mid-corner, nothing makes up for a lack of weight. :action-smiley-069:

  • 2 weeks later...

What about a non turbo FC3S RX7 or even a 1st Gen RX7.....Brilliant handling cars with a few suspension mods (well my series 3 was) lightweight, cheap to rebuild if you blow a motor and plenty of potential power wise down the track.

An FC Turbo will be my weapon of choice once I get round to getting a track car built.

Plenty of Bolt on avaliable for FCs over the 1st gen cars for track work so I would be leaning towards one of those, Ive seen them For-Sale for as little as $4000 for an early model FC3S.

Datsun 1600, RX3, old RX7, Sprinter or 4age KE70, MX5!!!

Keep It Simple!

light NA carby cars are fun, easy to trouble shoot, and cheap.

Gonna be easier on tires and brakes, and i find my datto teaches my how to drive.

-Ryan

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...