Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So are R33s. But what invalidates the R33 GT-R's 7:59 "production car" time is the slicks, removal of speed limiter, and non-standard boost....not its looks.

It can be road registered in its country of origin. Its built in production volumes. Your dislike of it doesn't get rid of the facts.

Yes, there are plenty of countries where the car can't be road registered. But then, the Enzo and Veyron can't be road registered in Australia. The Porsche 959 couldn't be registered in the US. Yet the times they pull would still be considered valid.

Yes its a track day special. But then so is a M3 CSL or 911 GT3 RS etc and no-one would disregard their results just because they're "track day" specials.

Yes they're also very compromise on the road. But then again, so is your typical supercar like the Zonda, as Top Gear showed:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drhoArQAXDg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZdU-d9RL0A

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuI0OPavDn0

The Radical SR8 is the fastest road legal car around the Nordschleife that you can buy straight off the showroom floor, assuming you've got the balls to drive it that hard.

Valid point, but you're taking this too seriously.

I wasn't saying the time was invalid, I was just saying, there are other factors that I'd personally take into account in my selection of car.

Performance would be up there, but looks, comfort etc would be relevant. (cost as well obviously lol.)

Who cares if it does a 6.55, the thing looks like a glorified go-kart.

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The ultimate track day weapon, bar none. not much good for taking the kids to school, or doing the shopping though. An R35 GTR would be fine for those duties.

lol.

Would rather an R35 GTR over that monstrosity. Yuck.

I wasn't saying the time was invalid, I was just saying, there are other factors that I'd personally take into account in my selection of car.

Oh, for sure. I'd never buy a Radical except for "toy" duties. Even with it street legal, can you imagine trying to drive it on a potholed Sydney road or over a speed hump?

Even then, I'd rather buy a Track Pack Ariel Atom instead. It may not be ultimately as quick, but it looks heaps cooler and has VTEC (yo). The Radical looks like an upside-down bathtub with wheels. The Atom looks like someone just took a small car and then got rid of everything extraneous.

So are R33s. But what invalidates the R33 GT-R's 7:59 "production car" time is the slicks, removal of speed limiter, and non-standard boost....not its looks.

Nissan claim the sub 8min officially, it was accepted at the time regardless of what we want to debate now.

Speed limiter wasn't included in the R33 GTR according to the country it got sold in (the Aussie R32s did not have it). It's not on slicks in that run either, boost is up for debate however it's not going to be more than the ceramic turbines can handle.

Speed limiter wasn't included in the R33 GTR according to the country it got sold in (the Aussie R32s did not have it). It's not on slicks in that run either, boost is up for debate however it's not going to be more than the ceramic turbines can handle.

What country was the R33 GT-R sold in officially, aside from Japan? Grey imports notwithstanding (and, if they are grey imports from Japan, then in "production trim" they would have the speed limiters intact).

I understood that it was on at least R-Comp semis for that run, which might have been available as a factory option on the car, and non standard boost (no matter how little the boost up) is still not production trim.

I also read somewhere that the car had a cage in it. More weight, but also more rigidity.

What country was the R33 GT-R sold in officially, aside from Japan? Grey imports notwithstanding (and, if they are grey imports from Japan, then in "production trim" they would have the speed limiters intact).

I understood that it was on at least R-Comp semis for that run, which might have been available as a factory option on the car, and non standard boost (no matter how little the boost up) is still not production trim.

I also read somewhere that the car had a cage in it. More weight, but also more rigidity.

How did you understand it was on Competition tyres? Actually suggestions of increased boost are really baseless as well, we can't really confirm or deny it (suggesting it was increased is based purely on the belief that it was for no other reason?). There is also no roll cage in the car (that you can see).

I think perhaps you are looking for possible reasons to invalidate the sub 8 min claim but, so far we are getting internet speculation, doesn't stand up especially when there is no evidence.

I mean I can understand if the argument is that Nissan are lie tellers and the other brands aren't, that I can accept and we can agree to disagree.

Now back to topic...

so out of the 32's the 33's and the 34's the 33 laped the ring fastest..... ?

if that is true... up yours boat calling fan boys >:P

either way, 33 > 32 >:D

33 GTR's sample data from the sensors at twice the rate of R32 GTR's, and have full electronically controlled solenoids to control steering as opposed to hydraulic R32 stuff. technologically if the R32 was a 386 (and it's ECU has about the same processing power) then the R33 is a Pentium 1.

That said, we're talking about GTRs. Driving an R33 GTSt is still like picking a retarded kid to give you a piggyback.

33 GTR's sample data from the sensors at twice the rate of R32 GTR's, and have full electronically controlled solenoids to control steering as opposed to hydraulic R32 stuff. technologically if the R32 was a 386 (and it's ECU has about the same processing power) then the R33 is a Pentium 1.

That said, we're talking about GTRs. Driving an R33 GTSt is still like picking a retarded kid to give you a piggyback.

HAHAHAHAHHAHA just made my day

so the fact that a stock r33 will beat a stock r32 over the 1/4 mile just shows that the retarded kid can run faster than the able bodied kid you chose.

as for saying that the r35 whipped a veyron isn't really true. 2 seconds after nearly 8 mins isn't much. and you would also have to look at all the details. was it the same driver? did the veyron driver go as hard as he could the whole time (like was he going full throttle down the straight and throwing caution to the wind). i am not disbuting that the new gtr isn't quick, i am more disbuting the time of the veyron.

Yes, there are plenty of countries where the car can't be road registered. But then, the Enzo and Veyron can't be road registered in Australia. The Porsche 959 couldn't be registered in the US. Yet the times they pull would still be considered valid.

Yes its a track day special. But then so is a M3 CSL or 911 GT3 RS etc and no-one would disregard their results just because they're "track day" specials.

well said *claps

It was actually confirmed officially by nissan at the time. It's really only rumours recently (due to revised talk about skylines all over the net) disputing this fact doing the rounds that it wasn't officially confirmed.

I remember seeing it again recently on some sort of official Nissan literature and it's on the Nissan GTR launch website as well.

THat is correct, It was an official time 20+ seconds faster than the R32. I cant remember (for the life of me), the time for the R34 though. maybe its on the offical site.

Hey... I didn't call your car fat. But now that you mention it :glare: my analogy was about the handling of an R33 GTSt compared to an R32 and R33 GTR.

Think of it as sibling rivalry :) All in good humour.

Anyone see the Top Gear ages ago, where the current supercars were compared to their 80's and 90's counterparts?

Long story short, the Enzo, Zonda and Carrera GT were blown out of the water by the Mclaren F1, XJ220 and F40 in terms of outright speed, and handling.

Reasoning is, current cars are loaded with ESC, yaw control, throttle assist, all the stuff to make it easier for the average mug to drive quickly, but at the cost of outright pace. Whereas the 80's cars would happily let you spear into a tree at mach 2.

Apply this to the GTR and the 32, and the gap in times isn't so much a reflection on power, but also on safety and other secondary criteria.

my 2c

Anyone see the Top Gear ages ago, where the current supercars were compared to their 80's and 90's counterparts?

Long story short, the Enzo, Zonda and Carrera GT were blown out of the water by the Mclaren F1, XJ220 and F40 in terms of outright speed, and handling.

Reasoning is, current cars are loaded with ESC, yaw control, throttle assist, all the stuff to make it easier for the average mug to drive quickly, but at the cost of outright pace. Whereas the 80's cars would happily let you spear into a tree at mach 2.

Apply this to the GTR and the 32, and the gap in times isn't so much a reflection on power, but also on safety and other secondary criteria.

my 2c

I haven't seen that episode. Only the one where they were comparing the same car heritage (ie. 300ZX vs 350Z) but of different eras. Is there a youtube link for this?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...