Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

But its a GTR, it will still do big ends.

But seriously on the matter of gearboxes, does anyone know the system in the Lambos/R8s etc? They are awd so woudl be itneresting to hear how they have put up with 2 years of use with the extra load on them from the AWD

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It really is a shame that as soon as tyre manufacturers start making semi slicks big enough for the R35 that ppl are going to have to remove the engine and install custom sumps with baffles, as new R35s spinning big end bearings isnt good for them . Great to see they are keeping the spinning bottom end history of the GTR alive

Hahahaha you are a funny unit Troy :blink:

Not sure on the wear on them but from reputable articles I've read on the Lambo E-gear suggests that you don't tick the option box if you intend on tracking it as it isn't the best bit of gear. I have read that they are improving it though....

A reasonable period of time?

The engineering world has been using it for almost as long as there has been GT-R's.

It is nothing new.

Since I am not an engineer or experienced with plasma coating, I am relegated to using evidence-based practice. So I did a search in using plasma coatings with an automotive application. The above excerpt from a research article was the closest I could come to how Nissan was using the technology.

This was the historical use of plasma coating in automotive.

The technology of plasma sprayed coating has been introduced in series production for very different types of engines:

- LUPO gasoline FSI 1.4 l of VW in 2000

- V 10 TDI diesel of VW in 2001

- Go-Kart racing engine four strokes in 2000

- Formula1 and Formula3 for racing in 1999

- Motorcycle engine in 2000

- Large volume I5, I6 diesel for VW in 2002

Additionally several prototypes of modern gasoline and diesel engines are now involved in long term testing. The test results have been confirmed in Europe and Japan by several engine manufacturers.

It's interesting that it took so long to be applied to the automotive industry as it appears to be a fairly inexpensive process.

  • 2 weeks later...

So does v-spec still stand for "Victory Spec" in celebration of a JGTC championship win, as when the 32, 33 & 34gtrs won the championship, they bought out v-spec versions, just like when they bought out a nur spec...

the 35 hasn't won a championship as yet so, no v-spec 35 until it does...?

Porsche developed the DSG system for their race program in the 70's. Its old technology which was hounded by weight and size. VW/Audi honed that technology in the late 90's and made it production viable not long after the turn of the century. Nissan seem to be the first off the block to have a full running production version in a vehicle running decent torque through it. Interesting to see what transpires with its reliability once more power gets pushed through. Porsche have a dsg option on the 997 replacement.

LOL @ manual gearbox being boring to drive. Thats as naive as it gets, id suggest more time learning to drive on the limit before comments are made on a true driving experience. Electronic talent is the way of the future, but pure driver involvement is much more satisfying.

  • 4 weeks later...

The V-Spec is due in December.

Nissan execs have also confirmed that the GT-R is an unprofitable model but the introduction of vehicles based on the same platform will help change that. In addition to the Spec V, the platform is expected to yield a model for Infiniti due for release in less than a year.

More information that a PM platform sedan or SUV is in the making. I hope they do, since a raft of cheaper cars with parts interchangable with the GT-R (which is sure to enjoy a healthy aftermarket) can only be a good thing for Nissan enthusiasts.

I just hope no-one slaps a GT-R badge onto their sedan as a result.

by unprofitable model are they referring to the TOTAL cost of the car, ie... the countless hours and $$ in R+D. As opposed to the profitability relative to one GTR unit?

Is there a difference? R&D is a cost of producing the car. Even if you make a margin on pure manufacturing costs, the company's bottom line still suffers if you can't make the volumes in car's lifecycle.

So does v-spec still stand for "Victory Spec" in celebration of a JGTC championship win, as when the 32, 33 & 34gtrs won the championship, they bought out v-spec versions, just like when they bought out a nur spec...

the 35 hasn't won a championship as yet so, no v-spec 35 until it does...?

Its just marketing.....

Creating a reason why you should spend an extra $20K....

Its also creating its own after market products before the rest do.

  • 1 month later...

V-Spec details

Nissan’s new Nordeschliefe hopeful will be packing close to 390kWs, up around 35kWs, while torque jumps almost 15Nms peaking just shy of 600Nms. The fun doesn’t stop there either as the V-Spec will shed some 90kgs from its portly frame bringing kerb weight down under 1700kgs. The drop in weight is thanks largely to the use of lightweight body components, they’ve even gone as far as ditching the back seat and adding a roll cage. If earlier reports are accurate, we should expect to see new wheels and tyres with revised braking and suspension to round out the package.

Sweet.

The details many of these websites are publishing as fact are just month old rumours.

They're close to the real info stats wise but there's more to it that they are missing.

And it is most definitely not V-Spec. It is Spec-V I guess it's time to start getting used to it... :(

The details many of these websites are publishing as fact are just month old rumours.

They're close to the real info stats wise but there's more to it that they are missing.

And it is most definitely not V-Spec. It is Spec-V I guess it's time to start getting used to it... :)

Spec V ya say......hmmmmmm (strokes beard) Wonder what rocket scientist came up with that piece of originality. :(

Nissan said the car would be cheaper than a 911. That's probably what's holding the price the car is worth, to meet that "requirement".

Considering all the dealers are marking them up like a bitch already, and people are paying it, clearly the car could be sold for more.

I hope that they do build a PM platform sedan, to help recoup the costs....and build something to smash the Panamera.

Porsche developed the DSG system for their race program in the 70's. Its old technology which was hounded by weight and size.

The electronics were not fast enough back then to bring the DSG gearbox into a production ready product, there isn't anything super exotic about materials or production techniques to have made a DSG box in the 70's.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...