Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That does make helping harder, where are you located

What you might have to do is rip off one of the cam covers and get the part number off the end of the cam cause if their not poncams but full aftermarket then poncams may not be "boltin" any more in which case you may as well go the 260 x 10.8 procam or better yet the unigroup cams

Located in Warrick Farm area, between Cabra and Livo, hmm, i'm not very confident in doing that myself xD might need some help.

I didn't intend to get involved in the usual FIP section pissing contest.....just to make the point that if your tuner says they "tuned for response" without changing anything mechanically you better find a tuner who isn't talking shit.

Jimmy, I was listing mechanical factors that affect response; once the mods have started most people forget how early the standard setup gets on boost. I built the stagea deliberately for response which is why it has standard zorst manifold, standard cams, standard head, small turbo and 3 litre bottom end. And it makes 18psi by 3200 rpm

stagea_dyno_2012.jpg

If I wanted more response I would add cam gear (as I have on the race car), it can bring on boost a few hundred revs sooner at the cost of top end power. But frankly it comes on hard enough early enough to empty the fuel tank quickly.

For a race car I would say it is a very different concern. Full boost at 5 or even 5.5 is adequate especially if you have short gears and a standard or raised rev limit.

  • Like 1

You can't because it wont sounds nice

Not that I'm sure that anyone would be able to hear the difference.....but if all you are worried about is the sound, you must also be the type that buys cars on how many cup holders it has!

Not that I'm sure that anyone would be able to hear the difference.....but if all you are worried about is the sound, you must also be the type that buys cars on how many cup holders it has!

Shut up mate, I do that, my new car has 10 cup holders ?

For me,

Bottom end:

Standard rb26 crank, nitrided, chamfered oil holes, Standard rods resized and shot peened,

Hypertectic pistons, id have to look into brands before deciding, but i do not believe forged slugs are required, pistons to suit 10.5:1 comp with valve relief's, steel comp rings, low tension oil rings, restrictors fitted to oil feeds and head/block returns drilled out

Head: stock valves, heavy springs, cams 260/262 10.5 lift dialed @106/110, a good throat job and trim valve guides, head decked to suit chosen pistons,

Turbo and pipes: small diameter high mount turbo manifold, hks 3037s, 50mm gate with 2inch open screamer, 3 inch dump, no cat or mufflers, strait to the rear

2.5inch stainless cooler pipes to replacement factory sized cooler, water/meth nozzle directly before inlet to plenum,

Id run 18-20psi, i believe a good tuner could really lean on this combo and make a rediculasly responsive weapon that packs a punch

Hmm, first question to get a post out of me in a while lol

Lets not forget the key point to making response as to a revy engine.

Light recipricating weight in the engine.

Lightest pistons and rods, crankshaft and flywheel.

Gearing helps to enhance the free rev nature when on power.

Dont get too carried away though, a clutch dump start can lead to a serious bog down on launch. :)

Turbos, cams etc work with on power driving response as does a smaller volume intercooler etc.

Edited by GTRPSI

You can look at this another way by thinking what Nissan would have done if they wanted road car like characteristics in a GTR . I think the logical solution is to start with a Neo 25T Stag engine and build it up to a level rather than trying to convince RB26 to do what it wasn't intended to . Don't hate me people but I consider an RB26 a dumb road engine in some ways because Nissan didn't put any of the smarts into making it a nice road car engine . It was intended to be a bit of a hero drive because the basis was for a road race GT car not an all round street car .

The Neo has a higher CR and the last big bore (86) turbo RB revision of chamber and piston crown shape . The whole inlet exhaust and turbo systems are designed to make good part throttle torque which is what any successful ROAD car formula HAS to be based around .

This is not to say you can't build a pretty healthy RB25T that still retains good road car characteristics . Neo head I reckon better basis than RB26 because of the chamber redesign and the two stage inlet cam phasing . On the other side of the coing the RB26 inlet system is a better performance design and better suits a GTRs air plumbing .

Production 25s always had single turbos and they have developed to the stage that singles can be pretty good nowdays .

Consider this clean sheet approach .

Neo Stag 4WD RB25DET .

Graft RB26 inlet manifold onto Neo head .

Bore to 1 OS to have similar capacity .

Standard exhaust manifold .

GT30 based turbo ie 0.82 AR IW 3076HTA .

Don't think 300-320 RWKW is an unreasonable expectation and non of this stuff has GTR/RB26 "tax" attached . Legally no capacity or rated power issue and Neo is emissions approved engine in Australia . You lose all the TT complexity and service bastardisation you have with the hot side of a factory RB26 .

I reckon this combination would give a stdish GTR in the same shell ie 32/33/34 a bloody quick hurry up and be better to drive in Camry mode .

A .

  • Like 1
Part numbers they have listed in Ebay are for tybe B cams. which are 260 degree 9.15 lift.

http://www.tomei-p.co.jp/_2003web-catalogue/e070_cam_RB26.html

I sent tomei an email last week about those cams to check out what was the go with them and they replied that they were legit and we're a small special order item to some dealers

I sent tomei an email last week about those cams to check out what was the go with them and they replied that they were legit and we're a small special order item to some dealers

This is about the ex 270 9.15 lift right? Got told that they don't make them anymore, thats why they're not listed anymore.

Thanks log in. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
    • One year is a bit concerning. Did you try contacting GSP? It says 5 year warranty on the box if I remember correctly. I'm also running their driveshafts on my S2 Stagea.   You could check the part numbers on Amayama for your year. Here's the link for my 1998 which gives the 39100-23U60 part number. Well, that and 39100-23U70. https://www.amayama.com/en/genuine-catalogs/epc/nissan-japan/stagea/wgnc34/6649-rb25det/trans/391 What does it say for yours?
    • I ordered a GSP Front R/H Axle from here - https://justjap.com/products/gsp-premium-front-driveshaft-r-h-nissan-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-stagea-4wd#description It lasted around a year before one of the boots blew out. I'm lowered, but I have GKTech roll center adjusters. One year seems a little premature. I think I'm going to spend the extra money on an OEM cv axle this time. This website - https://tfaspeed.com/collections/nissan-stagea-wgnc34-x-four-parts/products/nissan-stagea-awc34-260rs-rb26-right-front-axle-drive-assembly Makes it sound like the readily available OEM CV axle will only fit 11.1999 Stagea and up (mine is a 2.1997 S1). The JustJap listing didn't mention any years or anything for the GSP axle. Amayama shows '11.1999' and up as well for that part number. As well as 'plastic boot type'. See attached picture. So I guess my question is, does that axle (39100-23U60) really only fit S2 Stagea? It's the front driver side. If it does, I'd love to buy that instead of rolling the dice on another GSP. I've found that OEM one cheaper here: https://www.partsfornissans.com/oem-parts/nismo-jdm-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-r32-gts4-right-front-axle-3910023u60 and here https://www.nissanparts.cc/oem-parts/nismo-shaft-ft-drive-3910023u60 Just a little confused because the JapSpeed listing for the GSP front driver axle doesn't mention any specific years or anything and it fit my S1 Stagea fine. So will 39100-23U60 fit my S1 Stagea even though technically it says '11.1999' and up? What would have changed? Thanks.  
    • Thanks for the info. The only "Issue" I've had with the shifter is I always found the throw between 4th and 6th gear too close. I'm always worried to shift into 4th accidently and sending my motor to the moon. Adam LZ recently came out with a video and stated Serialnine revised their shifters to correct this and will change all the revised parts for 150$. Strangely enough, I contacted Serialnine right after and they denied it and said it's bullshit. I found that strange as he's a distributer. I'll keep this forum post updated on that saga.
    • Yep that is correct. It allows you to adjust the short throw range from what I can tell
×
×
  • Create New...