Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 235
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Adam and those bashing Holdens. What is the population of Japan, how many automakers? What is Australia's population and how many car makers do we have?

Australia has a proud history of making sport sedans, performance saloons, GTR cars, whatever you want to call them. We like hot rods and its what our manufacturers are good at, it just so happens its all they can really do given the dollars.

The GTR is a all out purpose built sports car. The HSV is a hot rodded sedan, i love the fact that the cars are re-engineered mass produced cars. They are a different challenge to build, to drive and they appeal to different people. They are infinitely tunable unlike the European makes...so, anyway. I love cars, all cars.

Would i buy this...nope. Would i buy the Coupe should they build it...FARK YEH! Either that or the new Camaro thankyou.

I think some people feel better when they bash Holdens, each to their own i suppose. I can certainly see their appeal and i dont doubt HSV will sell them in a flash. The VL Walkinshaw could not be given away in its day, much like the R32 GTR. Look at what the VL is worth alongside a GTR :banana:

Adam and those bashing Holdens. What is the population of Japan, how many automakers? What is Australia's population and how many car makers do we have?

Australia has a proud history of making sport sedans, performance saloons, GTR cars, whatever you want to call them. We like hot rods and its what our manufacturers are good at, it just so happens its all they can really do given the dollars.

The GTR is a all out purpose built sports car. The HSV is a hot rodded sedan, i love the fact that the cars are re-engineered mass produced cars. They are a different challenge to build, to drive and they appeal to different people. They are infinitely tunable unlike the European makes...so, anyway. I love cars, all cars.

Would i buy this...nope. Would i buy the Coupe should they build it...FARK YEH! Either that or the new Camaro thankyou.

I think some people feel better when they bash Holdens, each to their own i suppose. I can certainly see their appeal and i dont doubt HSV will sell them in a flash. The VL Walkinshaw could not be given away in its day, much like the R32 GTR. Look at what the VL is worth alongside a GTR :banana:

Roy, the point i was trying to make was that this "commodore" has the badge "holden" attached to it and for holden to stick a 170k price tag to it has me blunted and stumped 0 all because of what you claim is a renaissance of all things aussie tru blue. Sorry, it doesn't really cut it.

Are Holden past the point where they have stopped making single OHC engines with Rockers and Rollers? Do you remember the Soarer came out with quad cam technology 14 years ago>

So Holden are catching up now are they? Do they know what a DSG actually is? Im sure if they looked it up they would. Do they even have ONE semi auto sequential GB in their entire lineup? I could go on.

My other point is that the technology that current other auto makers - such as the Japanese and Germans are employing - far outstrips and outclasses whatever technology Holden are employing - so much so its a farce that they have the audacity to lob the 427 in GTR or 911 price range.

The GTR and the 911 are technological breakthroughs - the 427 is definitely not.

Edited by m3gtr

its an impressive engine the american know how to build v8's. but i think its a bit rich but in the future this car is more like an investment im pretty sure in 30 to 40 years time these will be worth a bit if they are still around.when it was released at the motor show they said it does 0-100km/h in mid 5 seconds which shows it must weigh a fair bit.

just a quick question with all the newer SS's and people badging them with chev badges is the entire engine made by chev or is it just the engine block. its just ive herd somewhere that all the other components like the rods and pistons and all that stuff are holden while just the engine block is made by chev. just wondering if its true or not.

It's also the closest we're going to get to an Aussie built Corvette I'm afraid, but even you would have to admit that in recent years the quality of the local product has been improving, at least with the Chevrolet motor there's all that US based R&D and aftermarket support, they aren't trumpeting it as a technological marvel either (I find the economy and power that they can still squeeze out of pushrod motors the most fascinating part actually).

The price is a tad over the top given that the current top of the line Senator is around about 80k or so, however the Group A cars had a similar markup back when they were released and cashed up bogans or not, I think that there would be plenty of interest even in that price range.

m3gtr, the current HSV lineup does include a tiptronic style 6 speed automatic if that's what you were getting at btw.

Edited by bozodos
Roy, the point i was trying to make was that this "commodore" has the badge "holden" attached to it and for holden to stick a 170k price tag to it has me blunted and stumped 0 all because of what you claim is a renaissance of all things aussie tru blue. Sorry, it doesn't really cut it.

Are Holden past the point where they have stopped making single OHC engines with Rockers and Rollers? Do you remember the Soarer came out with quad cam technology 14 years ago>

So Holden are catching up now are they? Do they know what a DSG actually is? Im sure if they looked it up they would. Do they even have ONE semi auto sequential GB in their entire lineup? I could go on.

My other point is that the technology that current other auto makers - such as the Japanese and Germans are employing - far outstrips and outclasses whatever technology Holden are employing - so much so its a farce that they have the audacity to lob the 427 in GTR price range.

The GTR is a technological breakthrough - the 427 is definitely not.

All very good...but can you imagine how much the car would cost if Holden had to build a quad cam engine, DSG gearbox etc for such a low volume vehicle? I dont thnk the premium asking price is worth it. But i can see where the numbers come from when you consider they will actually sell them at those dollars.

Also, regarding the Soarer motor...so what. It makes no more power or torque then the equiv year model HSV. Why pay for all that complexity when it doesnt give you more power, and marginal improvement on economics. Can you imagine how much it would kill the aftermarket scene if you need 4 cams for an NA power upgrade. Hell Porsche had 2 valve heads for ages, MErc ran 3 valve hears, they even built a pushrod engine to race at the Indy 500. I dont get why people get so caught up in the pushrod thing. The resutls and tunability make them more desirable to me. I would love to buy a 240Z and throw an 8 in it. I would love to say i wold go VH45 but there is no way you could go past a Chev. Hell look at the Ultima, pushrods and would blow a GTR into the weeds

Anyway OT and a pointless discussion that is had on this forum every fortnight. Fact is all new performance cars a friggin fortune these days, sadly the HSV is no different...though to me not enough of a gain over a Calais or SS after a visit to local speedshop and suspension joint :banana:

they said it does 0-100km/h in mid 5 seconds

Dude, my 2005 Forester STi does 100 in under 5 and itll be 4 years older before the 427 is released. Im sure also my Fonz can hose the thing in the wet with less horsepower but more grip and less weight.

Your statement willingly or not ( and im not grilling you on it ) reinforces my point.

Dude, my 2005 Forester STi does 100 in under 5 and itll be 4 years older before the 427 is released. Im sure also my Fonz can hose the thing in the wet with less horsepower but more grip and less weight.

Your statement willingly or not ( and im not grilling you on it ) reinforces my point.

what i meant was that that is slow its not impressive at all i was expecting something faster than that considering the size of the engine. with all the technology around now, just look at the german v8's they are smaller but still make more power than this.i think that holden keep thinking that the only way to get more power is to just go bigger.

Funny you should mention the previous prototype, I was just reading up on that, seems like the new one is a bit watered down compared to the previous HRT-427 which did 0-60mph in 3.8 seconds and 11.8 second quarters, that was with a Corvette C5R race engine with 8 throttle bodies, a carbon fibre intake manifold and bonnet. The expected price on that was $215 000 way back in 2003!

I honestly dont know how comparing a Subaru of any type to a rear wheel drive V8 is any kind of real comparison, of course a WRX is going to outhandle most things in the wet, you could hypothesize that the HSV would murder it on a drag strip or a race track due to a higher top speed, its all horses for courses.

0-100km/h times are all fine and dandy, but to me the measure of real performance is the trap speed over the qtr mile, and how quikcly a car can trounce from 80km/h to 200km/h. Some cars are flattered by less power and more grip, cars like WRXs and even little Golf GTis etc. Wind out the gears and they lose out as theu traction whilst flattering only helps them up to 60km/h.

Where you can use all this power? Nowhere, all cars are too quick to enjoy on the street these days. Thats why i am loving the Getz i am driving at the moment, so underpowered and so little grip you can have fun and not doing anything too silly

All very good...but can you imagine how much the car would cost if Holden had to build a quad cam engine, DSG gearbox etc for such a low volume vehicle? I dont thnk the premium asking price is worth it. But i can see where the numbers come from when you consider they will actually sell them at those dollars.

Also, regarding the Soarer motor...so what. It makes no more power or torque then the equiv year model HSV. Why pay for all that complexity when it doesnt give you more power, and marginal improvement on economics. Can you imagine how much it would kill the aftermarket scene if you need 4 cams for an NA power upgrade. Hell Porsche had 2 valve heads for ages, MErc ran 3 valve hears, they even built a pushrod engine to race at the Indy 500. I dont get why people get so caught up in the pushrod thing. The resutls and tunability make them more desirable to me. I would love to buy a 240Z and throw an 8 in it. I would love to say i wold go VH45 but there is no way you could go past a Chev. Hell look at the Ultima, pushrods and would blow a GTR into the weeds

Anyway OT and a pointless discussion that is had on this forum every fortnight. Fact is all new performance cars a friggin fortune these days, sadly the HSV is no different...though to me not enough of a gain over a Calais or SS after a visit to local speedshop and suspension joint :banana:

Roy, mate - youre missing my point at the start but coming around at the end of your post.

Im not arguing the fact that OHC's can make power - shit look at top fuelers! Add a blower or a snail and ofcourse you make massive power. So what?

Yes..sure. Its been done and dusted. Then brushed off and done again. Im talking about advancement mate.

The kind of stuff Holden knows very little about and would be struggling to justify in the face of hard edged journo's tearing into the fact that the car has a 170k pricetag. Sorry Roy, the math does not add up.

You mean to tell me the GTR and 911 arent any better than the 427 - even just because they employ more advanced technologies? Come on mate, thats one of the biggest reasons theyre better - AND they make the tricks work! Im not arguing the fact that Cubes equals power - that has been an equation we all grew up to understand.

I could go on with this.

What i am amazed at is that Japanese technology has always pushed the envelope, developed new areas of technology - and EFFICIENCY ( just look at hybrid technology!! Name ONE aussie car with a sniff of the stuff. You may laugh now..." that oil crisis and price bullshit is garbage" - yeh sure..ill be laughing later. )- that werent available to us before. You may argue the case for the pushrod being applicable in the right situation, historically, numerically, logistically... but i will counter argue with this...

So...Holden decided to build a stomping great big 7 liter 427 cube motor inspite of the fact that theres a ..well you know it..a GLOBAL oil crisis and all the effects that go with burning the stuff. Slightly insensitive wouldnt you agree and more than a touch arrogant. Thats only the surface of it but IS NOT my main point.

The Holden motor is a Chev for a start. The tech specs came from the US arm of GM...

what i meant was that that is slow its not impressive at all i was expecting something faster than that considering the size of the engine. with all the technology around now, just look at the german v8's they are smaller but still make more power than this.i think that holden keep thinking that the only way to get more power is to just go bigger.

I realise this. One other thing that irks the shit out of me is that Aussie manufacturers cant seem to understand the concept of WEIGHT REDUCTION.

i DONT understand. Why does the HSV HAVE to weigh nearly 2 tonnes!!??

It makes NO sense at all.

NO HSV has to be that heavy. Simple as that.

I swear, Holden needs to talk to its metal refinery ASAFP. :banana:

It's also the closest we're going to get to an Aussie built Corvette I'm afraid, but even you would have to admit that in recent years the quality of the local product has been improving, at least with the Chevrolet motor there's all that US based R&D and aftermarket support, they aren't trumpeting it as a technological marvel either

m3gtr, the current HSV lineup does include a tiptronic style 6 speed automatic if that's what you were getting at btw.

Totally acceptable. I see what you mean. The thing is - and think about it for a minute... How long has GM been involved in the placement of donks in Aussie cars?

Not very long im sure you will agree. Holden has its parent company, GM to thank for a lot.

Im not talking about a "tiptronic" by the way. The 1994 FTO GPX had a tiptronic in it and even then the tech wasnt new...Porsche knows tiptronic better than anyone.

Im talking about a twin clutch, paddle shifting, DSG Box that is use in the GTR and even the VW golf.

There were 50 ppl keen as to spend around $220,000 on the HRT427 Monaro until they canned the idea

And there STILL wasnt enough justification for the go ahead.

Ill tell you why.

The car cost WAY more than holden could afford. A realistic pricetag for what was in essence a road going "racecar" with the works was over 350k. They aimed to high pure and simple.

They never would have been able to justify the selling of such a car anyway. Holden have to answer to someone after all.

So...this time they got it "right" in that they tapped into what they had, within Oz and from the parent GM and had a host of parts to do with the body, underbody and drivetrain waiting for enhancement.

A much less costly option.

But a shitload more expensove for the same money spent in a GTR or 911/

Give me either. There is NO way anyone in MY frame of mind will pay that much for a commodore. I distinctly remember a "buddy of mine" bragging about his mates 250 odd kw HSV that he paid 60k for a few years back, saying it was the best thing since sliced bread/

LOL! Its like HSV is saying they are worthy of a 911 price tag!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...