Jump to content
SAU Community

3.0L VS 2.5L  

38 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Whats with the rev argument? I've never heard anyone bagging out the 2JZ calling it a truck engine & not good for reving. :(

(and we are talking built for turbo, not ppl using RB30E stock bottom ends)

Note: bore/stroke of RB30 is 86x85mm, 2JZ is 86x86mm

I only said MAYBE, and remember I was referring to using a stock RB25 head. I agree with the point you are making, however my rev comment comes from the fact that when you use a STOCK RB25DE head on a larger displacement engine, NATURALLY you are giving the 3litre a head which will flow exactly the same on a flow bench as the 2.5 litre.... giving it (per cubic inch) a more lazy power curve. Put the equivalent flowing head on a smaller motor, the smaller motor will turn into a "make my torque at higher rev" motor - put it on a bigger motor and it goes the other way around, one of the reasons RB30DETs using stock RB25 heads come across so chunky.

The 2JZGTE comes with a head from stock designed to be on a 3litre, so its a little different and even then people straight away shove a set of 264s or bigger in when going for more power - which is what anyone building an RB30DET *should* do if they aren't just clowning around.

Edited by Lithium
  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

okai let me put it to you this way.

you got a gorgeous tight blonde to the left, and a fat gorilla to your right, which one u want jerkin your shit off? trust me one is better then the other, and no i cant deal with the fact that some dickheads gonna prefer the 20kg hands of a gorilla peeln your dick like a banana.

lol nice analagy, but your going about it the wrong way, your still making one better than the other which it's not. saying to your left you have a gorgeous tight blonde and to your right you have a gorgeous brunette while not as tight is much better in bed, which one would you choose? There still gonna give you the same result, they just have different ways of going about it.....

lol nice analagy, but your going about it the wrong way, your still making one better than the other which it's not. saying to your left you have a gorgeous tight blonde and to your right you have a gorgeous brunette while not as tight is much better in bed, which one would you choose? There still gonna give you the same result, they just have different ways of going about it.....

haha nice

saying to your left you have a gorgeous tight blonde and to your right you have a gorgeous brunette while not as tight is much better in bed, which one would you choose? There still gonna give you the same result, they just have different ways of going about it.....

[removed my Moderator]

just like the rb25 has less torque, spools slower, makes less power with more boost.

i mean i wouldnt say no the the brunette, id rev her to redline.

but if i had the choice ill stick with the blonde thanks

lets do a poll on who thinks R34NRG is a d#ck??? :(

yeh okai "hoang" from "perth"

Edited by Craved
sexually explicit analogies are not required on a public forum
ummmmm... :D

What if you want both?

you get NAWS and be a pimp :(

Ive had big power, and honestly i wouldnt want it any earlier than i had on the RB25.

Who can say they have near perfect traction with well over 300rwkw? I did, and if i had power coming on 500-600rpm sooner it would have been a handful to drive.

I still had 4000rpm of power, was perfectly useable for me

lol!!!! ahhha. Im surprised you havnt been banned yet. Its people like you who give the forums a bad name. Stop clogging it up with your pointless, mindless BULLSHIT. btw i would like to see your dyno graph

take it easy hero, superman aint lookn for a sidekick just yet.

ill get a dyno graph up asap when i can find it. i know i know how oronic that i cant find it.

but im heading up to status tuning tm. Trent offered me a free dyno run to compare 2.5s to 3.0Ls back to back

you can come if you want...................

OH WAIT YOUR IN PERTH...........HOANG

but nah seriously ill get a dyno graph up asap

theres 11 people voting for 2.5s and only 2 ppl have explained why......

Edited by R34NRG

You're an idiot.

Go back to ns.com where you belong.

okai chief wiggum

why am i a idiot? because ive proven that 3.0L supass 2.5s in every logical way?

or because you dont have a sense of humour.

man u guys need to lightn up, laugh a lil damn....

Edited by R34NRG
you get NAWS and be a pimp :(

Ive had big power, and honestly i wouldnt want it any earlier than i had on the RB25.

Who can say they have near perfect traction with well over 300rwkw? I did, and if i had power coming on 500-600rpm sooner it would have been a handful to drive.

I still had 4000rpm of power, was perfectly useable for me

The nitrous comes a little later on for me, Ash. Like, once this forker decides it won't run a 9. LOL!

well if thats wat he meant that i retract my idiotic performance.

i never said the rb30 is a be all end all. all i said was i know why i went rb30. and everyone was like wtf why rb30. rb25 is way better.

yes i agree that certain rb25s could proberly munch a rb30 but wats the point in comparing apples and oranges. i was clearly explaining why a rb30 would be the ideal pick over a 2.5. not in personalized scenarios.

defiently, although i still may stick turbos on the big V =D

or a v12 lol

Too late champ.

Everyone already knows you are an idiot, you have a bit of a rep. :P

You're an idiot.

Go back to ns.com where you belong.

btw

rb30 is 86 x 86, not 86 x 85.

I agree with this. You're a complete tool.

Your opinions are so bias that you shouldnt have even bothered starting this thread. All it constitutes is you rambling on having a go at everyone elses opinion which is what you originally asked for.

Your uneducated dribble is also painful to read. Perhaps you should learn how to spell then learn some punctuation while you're at it.

Im a keen fan of the rb30 but wont bother posting an opinion as this thread is ruined already.

If you were on the forums that I admin you would have a stupid tag or be on the banned list by now.

On a lighter note, i was in the workshop when the black gtr was being tuned. The workmanship is top notch.

Edited by SirRacer

Is there any difference in block strength between the 25 and 30?

I have heard that the 30 blocks can sometimes be a little thin.

My neo motor seems to pull pretty hard in all gears from any revs not that i have my big turbo as yet!!!

Too late champ.

Everyone already knows you are an idiot, you have a bit of a rep. :P

you started it mate, your the one who asked for the thread, you got it.

I agree with this. You're a complete tool.

Your opinions are so bias that you shouldnt have even bothered starting this thread. All it constitutes is you rambling on having a go at everyone elses opinion which is what you originally asked for.

Your uneducated dribble is also painful to read. Perhaps you should learn how to spell then learn some punctuation while you're at it.

how the hell are the biased.....see this is wat im talkn about. some idiot comes along and calls my opinions biased......and dats it.....no reason as to why its biased. he says he dosnt want to post his opinon because the threads reuined. grow some ballz you girl.

I've been banned for so much less than what Andru is posting. It's about time someone ended it.

wat am i posting? advantages of having a rb30?, i dont stir any shit unless someone stirs it 1st. so dont blame me if im just holding my ground.

ive proved my point, so im done with this thread. i hope everyone links to this thread wen ppl talk shit about rb30.

theres a dozen votes for RB25, which no one has yet to clarify why. only a personality pick, dosnt really count but i wat ever.

mods can do wat they want with this thread

im out

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...35#entry3942035

dont discount 25s this one does the job nicely

okay okay.

ill say it again.

im not saying 25s are SHIT. im saying that 30s are better. understand people??!??!?!

i love 25s, been driving one since i got the car. but since upgrading to 3.0L its just a no brainer why id never go back to 2.5

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...