Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ill have a stab in the dark and say its a Vipec :D

Of course it is. Dirt man would be all over his arse shitcanning any thing else. ;)

he would say he was only joking tho. ;)

Edited by FineLine
im going over to the dark side mate. I am pretty sure with this ECU i can add a MAF if the MAP sensor pisses me off (this is a very good quality ecu so apparently this will not happen)

As for how the IM240 machine works at the RTA, i have NO idea.

But i do know how the machine reads, what it reads for and whats acceptable levels for whatever car.. I also know what levels are high medium and low when doing the dummy IM240 tests on the dyno instead of the guesswork i have been using previously.

Should be tuning another car for emissions very soon.

Fair enough , maybe having enough processing power to run everything in real time rather than count back etc may make a worthwhile difference . If it can self learn maybe the MAP system can stay on top of things .

My aversion is because I don't think inlet manifolds that work as an inlet manifold are real good at giving pressure signal clarity to a pressure sensing devise . The fluctuations in common plenum manifolds often don't give much idea what the engine wants because reversions don't mean much to an EMS . IMO the conditions upstream of the throttlebody/s

are what needs to known and a MAP sensor can't do that for you .

That aside I would always insist on having a system that can do MAF and MAP , like you said it leaves your options open .

I would also insist on something that can read the std optical triggers and run the six coils and fully sequential injection system .

Best of luck , cheers A .

yeah for sure!

I got another 3 emissions test to do... still got some more projects on the cards

once you get the map system sorted are you going to go for another emissions test?

assuming the MAP system wont be effected by reversion?

Hey mate

I did this for you on my last tank of e85 before going back to 98 (just untill i learn this new ecu)

I got 320km's to a full tank, and i did boost it a few times, did not drive like a granny. I used to get 350 - 430km's to a tank with 98

Once the car was tuned properly the e85 consumption was much better from when i first started.

Few things i noticed after the switch back to 98.

I have stalled the engine 4 times:

the fuel gauge does not go down to a quarter of a tank after 50km's

i cannot go up hills in 3rd gear anymore

i am changing gears more often then before.

i lost 40kw at the wheels

I am going to the United servo in Newcastle tomorrow to try and convince them to stock e85.

great thread mate, and very interesting work. thanks for sharing it. there is one simple little comparison I'd love you to do if you can. next time you fill up on e85 fill the tank full and re-set your trip meter. then when you go back fill it full again, read off how many kms you travelled and you can do a quick ltrs/100km figure. then try the same with PULP (if you ever use it again). XXXkms to a tank is a big vague as you have no real way to tell how much fuel is left in the tank and I don't even know how many ltrs a GTST tank holds! I'd love to know the ltrs/100km figures and it would add one more usefull figure to your so far very thorough investigations. :rofl:

Good luck with the test this arvo.

you have inspired me GT...

i've been looking into this for a bit and think i will give it a shot when e85 gets popular and we get pumps around melbourne. (ie after the v8 supercars start using it next year)

i've found a tiny laptop that i can permanently install in the glovebox for $400 and now i just need datalogit :) (CBF lugging around a loose laptop)

just hope my injectors handle it... dont wanna have to upgrade them again :D

I have 740cc, at what power level would the injectors be maxing out running E85? 330rwkw?

i got 340rwkw with e85 and was only up to about 70% injectors. heaps of room for more (i have 740's)

injectors are 555's i currently have 265rwkw on 19 psi 2835 pro s

you should be right to reach 300rwkw with e85

ohhh well just tell him its ok because you dont have a horse power figure goal, you have a KW figure goal =)

sweet... i was thinking 300 would be the e85 goal ;)

*cue ash telling me not to have a horsepower goal figure* :down:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...