Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Head was fully reconditioned but no porting was done. Tomei type B valve springs and new bronze exhaust guide inserts. Grex 264/9.3 cams. Tomei cam gears.

25psi boost.

BP 98 fuel.

Built and tunned by Jim at Dart Automotive.

It has plenty of response and mid range. Very happy with it.

Tim.

post-224-1286265041_thumb.jpg

This is my build thread but it hasnt been updated with new dyno graph above.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/32...ld-t320793.html

Edited by R32 Zilla
good work, its definately got a 10 in it with a good driver :down:

definitely!

i did an 11.1 with 320awkw (if i changed into 4th across the finish line & not hit the limiter in 3rd, it would have been a 10)

with 390awkw it is well truly a mid 10

good work, its definately got a 10 in it with a good driver :down:

Give us a chance! haha. I only got 3 runs the other night before it rained and it was called off. I was getting faster with each run. We were slowly dropping tyre pressures. Got an 11.21 @130 on the last run with a 1.78 60ft. As some of you know its not as easy once you get up around this power especially on street tyres. With my old motor it was just a case of giving it everything to reach its potential. But yea it is easily capable of a mid to high 10 with either some more practise on street tyres or a simple tyre change would get me there.

This is no drag set up though. If I wanted it to be faster over 400m I would have chose different turbos/turbo and made 500kw which this motor could easilly handle. I chose the -5's for response on the street and for hill climbs and the circuit etc. I like corners.

Oh and the 390kw is RWKW not AWKW Marko. I dont think that makes a lot of difference but lets not start that debate again haha.

Tim.

i ran 10.98 @ 130.7 mph with 405awkw, on old street tyres, federal 595s. and worn out os giken clutch,

last week with 285kw stockis R32 GTR just power fc,exh, steel wheel turboes, 3/4 tank of fuel, spare wheel, jack, all interior in etc ran 11.7 @ 118mph on my 2nd run, got booted out cause i didnt want to renew my ANDRA licence,

i spent over 45g on my last GTR to get 10.98, my new GTR i have spent maybe 4g, big difference in costs to get from mid 11s into the 10s

oh and i didnt mean to start a big war on rwkw to awkw :P

Just a question that is kind of related to here; in my quest to get to 400kW :(... does anyone know if you can use Supertech bronze manganese valve guides with Ferrea oversize valves? Ferrea don't make any for the RB26 apparantly.

Just a question that is kind of related to here; in my quest to get to 400kW :(... does anyone know if you can use Supertech bronze manganese valve guides with Ferrea oversize valves? Ferrea don't make any for the RB26 apparantly.

I dont see any reason why you couldnt.

I may actually be able to join this list very soon!! things are finally looking good! tho it may be steves 500kw club!

i will be going GTRS on a built 2.6, 280 10.8's, E85, CR box with as much boost as it will allow 2 bar close.. then back it off to keep things together haha.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...