Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've modified that rear housing alittle since tuner mentioned it was too hot. Should have more chance of hitting 300rwkws now with a larger turbine housing. Just depending on how hard he wants to push the car.

just got a call...

car went 340hubber hp (253kw) on 1.5bar (no dyno correction)

standard rb20det

gtr injectors

z32 afm

atr43g3 0.63 on standard manifold

will get a graph up tomorrow

Edited by Cerbera

I need my brain looked at, we were looking at the graphs trying to work out why the car had a wierd curve (laggy and not making enough top end power)

Worked out I had f**ked setting the cam gears, will get them set again (they are 4deg out on inlet and 8 out exhaust) and hopefully retuned later in the week

Stao, he didn't need to... Was holding boost at pretty much any level through out the revs. Hoping for at least 30odd hp with the cam gears fixed and a whole lot more response. Can't believe i made such a stupid error haha

Edited by Cerbera

Some updates. I've made a new type custom turbine wheel aimed for power incensement with OEM turbine housings. Its expected to gain HP by roughly 10%。 Let me know if you are interested to try them out. I will pay for your tune at Dr.drift. You must have a fully working car with all supporting mods including ECU, injectors, Z32 AFM, 3inch turbo back exhaust and a metal intake pipe.

Also I want to make a note for people who's currently running this type of split dump pipes:

shitdump2.jpg

First of all the divider isolates the internal gate area which the gate flap does not open to a full 90 degrees. This result boost creep issues.

Diagram not up to scale, just give you a basic idea of what happens.

wastegate.JPG

2ndly the inner diameter is 2.3 inches with the split pipe plumbed back. Factory dump has 2.5 inches inner diameter. In another word factory dump would flow better then above, it will create exhaust flow restrictions resulting high back pressure and high exhaust manifold temperture affecting overall power output. For the best results please run a 3inch turbo back pipe or a bell mouth dump with 3inch front pipe.

Tthe divider isolates the internal gate area which the gate flap does not open to a full 90 degrees. This result boost creep issues.

2ndly the inner diameter is 2.3 inches with the split pipe plumbed back. Factory dump has 2.5 inches inner diameter. In another word factory dump would flow better then above, it will create exhaust flow restriction, Please do run a 3inch turbo back pipe or a bell mouth dump with 3inch front pipe for high performance applications.

What you have posted above is totally incorrect. That product works fine, there is no exhaust restriction in the way you describe at all.

Also as the wastegate gases have been split off, the WG pipe does not need to be as big as the dump pipe.

As you can see from here:

post-34587-1276873030_thumb.jpg

The Skyline turbo wastegate flapper does not open the way you have shown in your diagram at all. (R33 & R34 are identical)

The flapper opes to a perpendicular end, rather than a parrallel one as your little diagram has shown...

As a turbo retailer... I'm shocked. :)

Edited by GTR_RB26TT

That was just a basic diagram so every one can understand what happens in there. Diagram is not upto scale.

A 2.3inch pipe does not flow any better then a 2.5 or 3 inch pipe. Simple as that.

Does not matter what it is, fact is the diagram couldn't be more wrong if you tried.

What you are saying occurs, and what actually occurs are two different things unfortunately and misleading/incorrect.

The wastegate flapper is not impeaded at all, that is cold hard fact.

Users are being mislead by that diagram - you should delete it.

Edited by GTR_RB26TT

I'm not going to argue with the interpretation. This issue have been arose before, This diagrams explain the very nature of the problem.

Of course you not - it cannot be argued and hence you have now removed the inaccurate information that should never have been posted in the first place.

The diagram you removed had zero impact on the situation, you would not have removed it if it were correct :D

Of course you not - it cannot be argued and hence you have now removed the inaccurate information that should never have been posted in the first place.

The diagram you removed had zero impact on the situation, you would not have removed it if it were correct :thumbsup:

Stao has a hell of a lot of cred around here and is very generous with his knowledge and time helping people on these forums. He is also an expert on turbo's with valid point and you are just an annoying, rude NOBODY. :D

I rarely post, however I do read a lot and have been playing with turbos for 10 years myself.

The diagram I was questioing has now been removed, so sadly, you do not even know what you are commenting on.

I am not for one second saying Hypergear does not know what is going on.

However at times some of the information provided is just straight up incorrect & wrong.

Something you would not expect from such an expert, last nights diagram was another prime example of this.

If you saw what was posted last night, you would have your heads in your hands as I did last night viewing it.

Although I'm not sure what specifics you two are arguing about, Stao is correct about those split dumps jamming the wastegate. I had one of those split dumps on my car and it actually ruined my actuator diaphragm, dangerously gave me unlimited boost too. I disconnected actuator and moved the wastegate flap by hand...it only had 45 degrees of movement and kept getting stuck on something, which I thought was the pipe divider/seperator. Removed that and it was still getting stuck...turns out the wastegate pipe wasn't lining up properly and wasn't big enough. I die grinded the shit out of it, short of breaching the welds that hold the pipe onto the flange...and only then did it open up to 80 degrees. This STILL gave me boost creep (I run standard 7psi boost). I ditched it and got a custom 3 inch bellmouth made up, never had a boost creep / overboosting problem again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...