Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If it truly has full boost at 3k I really doubt it'll make over 250kw

garret who have far more engineering experience can't even make a turbo that does that, sorry to be negative but I just can't see it being true.

If it truly has full boost at 3k I really doubt it'll make over 250kw

garret who have far more engineering experience can't even make a turbo that does that, sorry to be negative but I just can't see it being true.

See turbochargers engineered in this project are solely for RB25det engines, Garrett would make a turbo to suit a variety of engines. There are room for improvement when designs becomes specialized.

At moment it feels like some where around the 280rwkws mark with very steady torque. Its drives very differently to any other turbos I've engineered or experienced so far. I'm expecting an out standing result.

If this turbo makes 280kw with full boost at 3k I will buy one in the near future, providing it holds the power to at least 6k on less than or equal to 20psi.

This will be a garret killer if it makes those results!

my current highflow makes full boost at ~3k but only makes 240kw on 18psi, so if I can get 40kw over that with the same response, holy shit!

What are the main engineering differences with this turbo over previous designs ?

Edited by Rolls

Always watching Stao's progress, keep up the good work mate.

full boost at 3k and 280rwkw+ may be possible as thats exactly what I have now... just with a Garrett stamp and a slightly higher price tag.

Always watching Stao's progress, keep up the good work mate.

full boost at 3k and 280rwkw+ may be possible as thats exactly what I have now... just with a Garrett stamp and a slightly higher price tag.

Dyno sheet please

Always watching Stao's progress, keep up the good work mate.

full boost at 3k and 280rwkw+ may be possible as thats exactly what I have now... just with a Garrett stamp and a slightly higher price tag.

NA + turbo does not count.

Nope - nothing special, no E85.

tuner said not much difference between what he has seen with normal turbo motor and the slightly higher compression NA with my turbo.

post-36975-0-79536600-1311255089_thumb.jpg this was with an electronic boost controller

post-36975-0-72596700-1311255208_thumb.jpg this was with a bleed valve

Decent power for the street, very useable... as soon as I touch the accelerator I get boost..

What turbo?

edit: just saw your post, how on earth do you get a GT3076 on boost by 3k? Most people are seeing 3.5 to 4k ? Was that with some ridiculous ramp rate?

Edited by Rolls

What turbo?

edit: just saw your post, how on earth do you get a GT3076 on boost by 3k? Most people are seeing 3.5 to 4k ? Was that with some ridiculous ramp rate?

The two runs are not equal... There must be some decent load and hold time on the EBC run as it starts at 9psi at about 2500rpm. A normal dyno run should start at around atmospheric pressure.

Second graph looks much more genuine with 18psi at 3500rpm which is pretty much what is expected from a GT3076R with a 0.63 :)

Edited by SimonR32

Its a good result :thumbsup: , high comp engine with adjustable cam gears would make a turbo spool earlier. Plus different dynos with different sittings would read differently. Compare to one of my earlier runs using the same dyno:

RB25DE high comp, adj cam gear, 3076 .63 ext gate, with a bleed valve

post-36975-0-72596700-1311255208_thumb.jpg

Standard RB25DET motor, stock head, ATR43G3 int gate, with Bleed valve. My run ended early due to misfire while still making 294rwkws.

post-27032-0-82969500-1311261862_thumb.jpg

They looks similar in terms of Power VS Response VS KM/H. But I know the SS-1 PU is more responsive. :yes:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The prices I’ve heard aren’t that bad 
    • Oh, I also meant to say that it is possible to use a venting BOV and restrict its outlet down so that it does vent enough to prevent the sututu, but vents slowly enough that the AFM doesn't see all the air at once and makes it easier to avoid stalling.
    • I'll go talk to my bank manager. Either that or my nearest western Sydney drug baron.
    • Driveability will be about the same with either externally venting BOV, or no BOV at all. Perhaps worse one way than the other, with me thinking that the definitely more flow going through the AFM through a venting BOV more likely to cause rich stalls than the perhaps more flow that the AFM might read on reversion. There is no such thing as "turbo damage" from not having a BOV at stock, or even quite a lot higher than stock, power levels. You need a big turbo with a lot of mass spinning hard getting a horrible slowdown from a slammed shut throttle before there is anything like the shaft loads required to damage things. Not an issue on small turbos. The ONLY 2 reasons that Nissan put a recirc valve onto the RB were: It is a bypass valve. It is open when under vacuum. When not on boost, it bypasses intake air forward around the compressor, which unloads the compressor, allowing the turbine to sping more freely, making the whole lot a bit more efficient when just puddling around. Throttle response should also be faster via the shorter, smaller diameter BOV pipe (when in NA, ie before the BOV closes and boost is building) which is nicer for driveability. Emissions. The reversion causes CO pulses. Eliminate the reversion (or at least, keep it away from the AFM) and you don't get that. The stalling/driveability aspect could have been tuned around, as shown one example of by dose above, if Nissan hadn't put a recirc valve on. Many many turbo engines before the RB had no BOV. They did not stall. See the RB30 turbo as an example. Nistune is definitely better than just stock ECU. It allows you to access and change things that are not excellent on the stock setup, and allows you to do mods like put decent injectors in, relocate the AFM, put a bigger turbo or even cams, etc, on, change to coil swith completely different swell needs, etc etc. All the things that you might need or want to do 25 years after the car was new. Aftermarket replacement ECU is obviously better again, because it gives you even more freedom from the constraints of the stock ECU. I won't be needing to go any further than Nistune though, for the new turbo in the 250ish rwkW region I'm going to, with big injectors, and most other things being stockish.
    • Lucky the prp block is supposed to be released next weekend 
×
×
  • Create New...