Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Turbo actually acts like a massive muffler, can really hear the difference in exhaust note when changing to a big rear housing turbo. Really takes all the crackling and rasp out of the note, is why NA cars always sound like ass in comparison.

Turbo actually acts like a massive muffler, can really hear the difference in exhaust note when changing to a big rear housing turbo. Really takes all the crackling and rasp out of the note, is why NA cars always sound like ass in comparison.

not sure bout that, mine has become alot more raspy and crackly with a bigger turbo and exhaust, but agree NA's sound very weak and crap in comparison

Thanks for all the info

What I'm thinking is I will just go the safest possible way and take the actuator off and just baby it up there should be fine.

Then I can smack the fuel rail in and plug the ecu in while I'm with DVS.

As I said I'm going to wire up a plug that my stock AFM and the Z32 can plug into and be interchangeable easily

Raspy and crackly is awesome. Drop the cat and listen how disgusting it sounds haha.

As if! I'd say it sounds awesome! haha

I went for a short drive with nothing but dump+front pipe+cat converter. Sounded great. Pissed people off nicely.

(don't try this yourself haha, you're risking a defect with a noise pollution fine on top)

Thanks for all the info

What I'm thinking is I will just go the safest possible way and take the actuator off and just baby it up there should be fine.

Then I can smack the fuel rail in and plug the ecu in while I'm with DVS.

As I said I'm going to wire up a plug that my stock AFM and the Z32 can plug into and be interchangeable easily

just get the guy in the chopper to drive it, lol, looks like he knows what to do!!:rofl2:looks like a chopper ,

Edited by SliverS2

not sure bout that, mine has become alot more raspy and crackly with a bigger turbo and exhaust, but agree NA's sound very weak and crap in comparison

That is what I mean, the bigger turbo doesn't muffle as well.

Anyone else noticed how much quieter an atr43 ss1 is with a pod instead of the airbox. I can barely hear my turbo anymore.

Edited by lilcrash

That's how it sounds so far. But keep in mind that I'm not pushing it into boost yet, but when I first got the atr running it was LOUD!!!!

Haven't heard back yet :/

Edit. All clear. Nothing dangerous in there :)

Edited by lilcrash

My old evo was much louder with an airbox than it was with a large surface pod.

The airbox had a trumpet looking snout on the front of it lol

SS1PU highflow...installed! Now looking for a tuner to finish the job, but thought I'd post in here my untuned first impressions, because they really took me by surprise. Prior to the turbo swap, my R33 GTS-T was making an untuned 170rwkw on standard boost (7psi), with only a 3 inch turbo back and Blitz FMIC, so fairly healthy for an RB25. I had Stao make me up an SS1PU, shoehorned into the R33/R34 comp housing for a stock looking appearance.

Wow...this turbo has totally transformed my car for the better and it's not even tuned yet. I expected the engine to be running fairly average until tuned, I was even hesitant about getting on boost...but I baby stepped my way to the standard 7psi...and am in love with the car again. It makes me think there was something wrong with my existing turbo/actuator or that my broken manifold studs were giving me an exhaust leak.

- Exhaust note is deeper and louder (sounds great), which corresponds with what Rolls was saying about a turbo acting like a muffler

- Turbo spools deeper and quieter than the factory item (I have a pod too, lilcrash), at least until ~7psi where it makes lovely sounds

- Lag...what lag? This thing has maybe 200rpm less response than the standard turbo, which has actually made it more street friendly

- Once it starts making boost, it shoots up very quick...I had to watch the gauge carefully to avoid R&R...I can see solid midrange potential here

It always scared me, the thought of upgrading my turbo and losing too much of the factory response / daily drivability. If you have these concerns, get this turbo. What little response I have lost, translates to a better daily drive all round. I find Skylines to be tortoise or hare cars, where you either get overtaken by a Hyundai while trying to drive off boost, or try to go anywhere faster and you sound like you're trying to race everyone. Now the car moves along in the traffic quickly and effortlessly, but still has it's super fast mode for when you do actually want to race.

If this thing delivers the top end that it's supposed to, after being tuned, I have no doubts this is the best value turbo upgrade for an RB25. It's already been a worthwhile swap!

I had Stao make me up an SS1PU, shoehorned into the R33/R34 comp housing for a stock looking appearance.

- Lag...what lag? This thing has maybe 200rpm less response than the standard turbo, which has actually made it more street friendly

It always scared me, the thought of upgrading my turbo and losing too much of the factory response / daily drivability.

Good to hear you got it fitted.

Wouldnt using the stock comp housing make this different to the actual SS1PU?

If we are to directly compare this turbo is definitely more laggy and not as responsive as stock below 3000rpm (not that i personally care about stock drivability) However - I must say because the way it sounds, spools etc imo it feels nicer than the stocker at those low rpms and is still very drivable

Yes Stao did warn me that I might be down on top end power due to the Nissan housing, but I guess we'll see once tuned. They are very similar in size so it wouldn't surprise me if they perform similarly. This was a necessary sacrifice as I wanted something very stock looking and my new turbo looks like it's been on the car for all 16 years of it's life :D

Still, the rear housing and core is all ATR43 SS1PU with FNT, so the response shouldn't be too different between mine and the regular SS1PU. I take it you're running an SS1PU, siks? My tacho wiggles all over the place at the moment, so I can't accurately tell you how laggy it is, but it's not that far off stock just going by the speeds at which boost comes on. Regardless, very happy with how early it is.

Wow...this turbo has totally transformed my car for the better and it's not even tuned yet. I expected the engine to be running fairly average until tuned, I was even hesitant about getting on boost...but I baby stepped my way to the standard 7psi...and am in love with the car again. It makes me think there was something wrong with my existing turbo/actuator or that my broken manifold studs were giving me an exhaust leak.

7psi on stock turbo doesn't = 7psi on this turbo which is why it feels so much better. it is pumping a lot more air.

found the same thing with my gcg highflow, tiny bit of lag but massive increase in midrange torque made it almost feel more responsive!

Edited by Rolls

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...