Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Lol very true, between boost bleeding off, square wheels and my brake pedal causing earthquakes in my car. I'm having lots of fun chasing problems.

Dont worry mate, my car is a nightmare too. Even Jez has nightmares about my car :thumbsup:

I just dont talk about it too much

Yeh but I'm already onto that and it hasn't costed me any money yet, that's no fun! :P

By the way, hoping to have results for my latest setup around the middle to end of this month. Just need to get my throttle cable issue sorted and then I'll book it in for a tune. VCT should now be working, so fingers crossed I've got it all right this time haha.

what did u do/change to get VCT working?

what did u do/change to get VCT working?

I'm not 100% sure that it is working yet, won't know until it is back on the dyno. I know the solenoid works as I switched it on with an active test using NIStune. So that's all good. I'm fairly sure that my tuner simply disabled the VCT because of the issues my ECU was having with not getting a TCS signal. That has since been taken care of by reprogramming my ECU with a Stagea image and there are no DTC's popping up anymore. So when it goes back on the dyno I will ask him to check that the VCT is setup properly.

The only other thing I can think of is that my timing is out. Whether someone has messed with the cam gear or I have an issue like Luke had where the harmonic balancer was retarding the timing I don't know, that will be the next thing to check if VCT isn't the problem.

Thought I'd post up an annotated version of my dyno sheet to demonstrate how early the SS1PU hybrid actually gets on boost (I think someone asked me?). Maybe I should just ask RP if they can give me an RPM overlay lol.

I used an online speed/RPM calculator and tried my best to get the variables right, so don't quote me on the RPM estimates, but they shouldn't be far off the real figures. I conservatively estimated them in favour of less performance, so they are if anything going to be slightly higher than the real numbers.

209rsc7.jpg

The RPM estimates inside the chart refer to specific points of interest:

3085RPM - Making the full standard boost of 7psi. Does anyone know when the standard turbo makes this? I don't think it's far off the mark. From here boost ramps up very quickly.

3750RPM - Fun times begin here, it's not max boost but it's 95% of it...

4035RPM - Boost finally smooths out to 16psi...I'm guessing it would produce the 20psi somewhere around this point if we were running that in the midrange.

5745RPM - Maximum power made long before redline. This makes it very safe and very streetable.

It's a shame the graph only starts plotting after 2510RPM because, as you can see, it is making a little less than 5psi long before that. I know ramp rates will be different depending on the gear you're in, but as I described previously (and Kasko supported), this turbo is unusual. It feels like it is ALWAYS making some sort of boost, no matter where you are in the rev range. The car just pulls along comfortably where off boost / turbo lag should be, very close to a naturally aspirated vehicle and better than the standard turbo setup. Stao should be paying me for this lol, but it is truly the most streetable turbo upgrade in my opinion, even if you're not chasing all the extra power. Considering how stock my engine bay looks and what this turbo does with those restrictions in mind, anyone concerned about defects should definitely be looking at one!

I think your rpm scale is probably about 200rpm short of where it should be 116km/hr should be about 4140rpm.

Also in regards to the start of the graph being at 5psi that is because the car has been loaded up against the dyno before the run has started.

Still not a bad little turbo for the price, there is a lot better out there but it will cost you a pretty penny premium.

Its been a while seeing the Greedy copies around with few good working examples. So we've imported few. The first one I'm interested to try is the TD06SL2 in 10cm with T3 flange turbine housing running 20G Billet compressor wheel.

It has been pulled apart and rebalanced (tolerance is about twice higher then where I normally set them to, its now corrected). to make sure every thing can work accordingly.

Those turbos are externally gated only and available to every one for $850 including GST and 12 month local warranty. I will refer to it as the EXGBTD06SL2

turbo.jpg

turbine.jpg

Looking through the turbine design, it appears been able to make plenty of torque, but I'm not too sure about response. There is also room in FNT turbine upgrade. I might be able to adapt internal gate onto it with the Nissan 6 bolt flange.

Stao I need to send my turbo back at some stage to get the external wastegate housing made but was thinking do you need one of these turbo's tested?

I'm willing to give it ago for you.

I think your rpm scale is probably about 200rpm short of where it should be 116km/hr should be about 4140rpm.

Based on what?

Also curious on what your variables behind "better" are...are you talking response or power or looking stock or efficiency or cost or ease of installation or...?

Based on what?

Also curious on what your variables behind "better" are...are you talking response or power or looking stock or efficiency or cost or ease of installation or...?

I contest both points also.

1. He could be running a different size tyre which could easily make for a 200rpm variance. If the man knows his car best then the man knows his car best. I wouldnt want to tell a full time owner of a vehicle what speed/gear/rpm should be, hes the one who should know best.

2. Im sure if there was a better 250kw turbo out there we would all be salavating for it and talking about it non stop, instead of pursuing the HG thread daily and pouring hopes and dreams into Kando combinations. I still believe the GTRS is a special item, but short of paying through the nose or picking one of the other 2 mentioned items I dont know what else there is to mention? We havent really seen much else yet.

Im sure once BW EFR's become readily available and we strap a T3 item to an RB the game MIGHT change. Until then, viva la HG/Kando and their recent unholy alliance.

Anyway, haters gonna hate :ph34r:

I'm not saying I can't be wrong or anything, I'd just like to know what he's basing his estimation of 200rpm variance on. I can go and measure it more accurately with the PFC controller to confirm how far out I am (it's speedo reading was very close to mine). I used 265/35/R18 tyres in the calculation plus the standard 4.11 diff ratio and then rounded up the figures, so they should be within ~10rpm unless I got my arithmetic and mm/inch conversions wrong.

I agree Scott, at this power output and maintaining this response, as far as I'm concered the HKS range is the only other contender if you're happy to pay for it. Even then it's not going to look anywhere near as stock, which is what someone like me is concerned with. HGs aren't for everyone, but I don't know what you can successfully challenge the SS1PU on if someone says it's the perfect turbo for their specific application.

Based on what?

Also curious on what your variables behind "better" are...are you talking response or power or looking stock or efficiency or cost or ease of installation or...?

I may be a little out, but if you run a GPS speedo and digital tacho you will have the most accurate way to find out :) Saying that I usually calculate on slightly different diameter tyres and they do change things a little!

"Better" would be better bottom end with similar mid range and top end (and hold power longer). I'm sorry but if you think that your result can go 10 rounds with a GT-RS or AX53B70 I think you are a little misguided.

I concede the GT-RS is probably the power-response king; Scott and I both agree with this. But as I said before, power and response weren't the only demands of the application. When you account for constraints like my standard compressor housing, a catalytic converter, return flow FMIC, boost maxed at 15psi in the top end etc., my SS1PU is running nowhere near it's full potential IMO. And I'm not so sure, given the same constraints, that the GT-RS would be all that far in front, if anything. Which would you rather have sitting under the bonnet when the plod knock on your window?

It's a shame actually, because I've made a little more power than most do using this turbo, I think in part to a very healthy engine and some good tuning, yet I also have one of the most restrictive setups holding back the potential. Stao on the other hand has done everything he can to max the power on one, and when you compare his results to the GT-RS it's six to one and half a dozen to the other.

I'm sorry but if you think that your result can go 10 rounds with a GT-RS or AX53B70 I think you are a little misguided.

I think I would have no issues doing above, infact I know the SS1PU is slightly larger then the GT-RS all around and was pretty consistent when on the dyno. I'll be back with few more wastegate side updates and can do some comparisons with what Trent's got in his PC.

Also found most tuners would retard timing as "insurance" for stock motor when it do hit 20psi. That explains the missing mid range, an update to the wastegate assembly is made, so all new units would have no issues holding boost using EBC with a 14psi actuator. Also the updated module is available for all ATR43 series at a cheap cost.

For that Billet TD06 there is no way it can be modified into a stockie bolton the possition of the turbine outlet is way off to stock 6 bolt nissan pattern. So it will have to be the way it is. I'm planing to let trent do some tests on his New Ceffero.

I might hit you up for a billet once my clutch and tuning is done..

you could sell me just a core or would it be cheaper to put a billet wheel on my turbo?

Let me know when you clutch is sorten. I think I will add the FNT turbine into it as well and make it a more unique TD06 to the generic version.

Could you explain the science behind the FNT or even a diagram showing what it is and how it helps?

Google didn't help me much.

fnt is staos own recipe, google will, not tell you the mans ideas

a typical turbine housing has a single nozzle where the gas ends its path and meets the wheel, stao machines the housing to have 3 nozzles so that the turbine gets 3 channels of precise gas flow and helps it pickup speed faster

seems excessive though to spend $1200-2000 on a clutch for the sort of power were talking about here...

any suggestions for better clutches then that dont go over $1K

Try an "F1 racing" clutch, which also goes by the name "gripforce". I have one in my car and i know of several in cars pushing 300+rwkw and going for 2 years+. Not bad for a $250 clutch :thumbsup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...