Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

mm I think that was optional. he's user id is Abe2 send him an email. Or see if ScottyM35 have some thing invented.

Thanks Stao. :)

I do an 80mm alloy intake kit to suit the stock airbox with bov and breather fittings.

post-63525-0-13924300-1339087856_thumb.jpg

That 80mm one would it suit a atr43g3 ???? I want something that would allow standard air box connection with plumb back for both retic and oil breather

Get scotty to make one for you then.

It would suit the 80mm

Its been made 4inches for a reason. Best to have a 4inch intake pipe.

Also I've got a R33 turbo sent in for high flowing about week ago, job is complete, but it has no name or return address on it. Please pm through if that belongs to you.

Ok than can anyone make one up four inch and reduce to 3 inch ( Scotty ). It has to be three for the afm

I'm sure Scotty could do the same design in 4", PM him to discuss it.

Like you said, you are running an afm like a z32 in the standard position, so your intake will have to be 80mm at some point to be able to connect the afm.

Just get a 4" to 3" silicone reducer for one end of the intake.

Edited by Mitcho_7

Its been made 4inches for a reason. Best to have a 4inch intake pipe.

Also I've got a R33 turbo sent in for high flowing about week ago, job is complete, but it has no name or return address on it. Please pm through if that belongs to you.

It's been made 4 inches because of the anti surge ports, not because it needs a 4 inch intake. While 4 inch would be good there is no point if you still run the afm. Mine has run 350kw on a 70mm internal pipe so this one with a 3 inch internal should be no problem for most customers.

I can make any piping you need but I would need the car here obviously.

Do the g2.5/g3 have 4" intakes? I always thought they were 3"?

G2 is 3 inch I can't say about g2.5 but g3 is definitely a 4 inch intake that's why it needs the spacer on the manifold

That 80mm one would it suit a atr43g3 ???? I want something that would allow standard air box connection with plumb back for both retic and oil breather

Anyone ever tried putting a pod in stock air box with the arse cut out?

Whats the point?

Just chuck a high flow filter on there and enjoy.

Or do you want induction noises ?

With Hi flow panel filter and a metal intake pipe I get a sweet induction noise, you don't need a pod for it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...