Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

:rofl:

f*kn lolwat????

. Since the car still use factory drain trans, for road use and city driving, it won't be too comfortable.

i reckon it'll be alright ...maybe not ideal but good enough... mines a little doughy around town but its all worth it when sink the boot into it :D

Whilst I agree with you Stao, if you make the assumption that the turbo is well matched (and you'd be the one to tell us how well matched the front and rear of this particular turbo is, given that we're talking about an SS2, not a 3076 here), then if you plot your operating point off the top end of the compressor map then you'd have to think that you were also pushing the turbine side too hard.

The real question here is whether that operating point on the 3076 map is equally as bad on the SS2 compressor.. Actually, it's not. I still agree with you. The real question is whether the SS2's turbine side is too small, but I thought I'd point out that we're looking at an orange map when we're talking about an apple compressor.

Fair point GTSboy

Would have been ideal to use a ss2 compressor map and I actually asked for the ss2 compressor map, but as there wasn't one Stao said to use the Gt3076 compressor map

You're a compressed apple.

Haha :w00t:

  • Like 1

Well, if using the 3076 comp map was Stao's idea then obviously he reckons the SS2 compressor will have at least a broadly similar map. Doesn't say anything about the turbine side, but that's life.

And that actually brings up an interesting point. To create a compressor map for a given wheel is a lot of work. There is a metric shit-ton of information in a compressor map. You have to run the compressor at a particular shaft speed and vary the restriction on the compressor outlet whilst measuring the flow going through it very accurately, measure the temperature change of the air and the shaft speed, then do some calculations on some of that data to get the efficiency, just so you can plot a single point on the map. You have to do a whole lot of this at different shaft speeds and restrictions to flesh out the map, then joint your dots up in the appropriate lines and "circles" to create the map. This is within the means of your Garretts and your Borg Warners, but it is probably outside the means of nearly every smaller turbo manufacturer. Just doing it for one compressor is a lot of work, but if you've got 10 or 15 compressors on your catalogue, setting out to map them all would be a daunting task.

Well, if using the 3076 comp map was Stao's idea then obviously he reckons the SS2 compressor will have at least a broadly similar map. Doesn't say anything about the turbine side, but that's life.

A 90T 60mm GT30 turbine is a reasonable comparison.

Us Vic guys even bring out the Cadbury favorites at these functions

I'll do this when you get rid of the Merc and get back into Jap cars :P

That's not gonna happen anytime soon

......Ummmm, cant say I totally aggree with you there hypergear....

A compressor map is made up of the efficiency islands based on a range of factors... one being shaft speed!

As whilst I agree its probably not the most accurate way to tell, it is very evident that blah_blahs engine has already gone over the maximum "efficient" shaft speed of 145,000rpm...

What causes the shaft to rotate? The turbine wheel!

Another interesting fact I learnt today talking to the right people:

An inefficient engine will run a higher timing advance to allow the extra time required to burn the a/f....

The more efficient the engine the less timing it will require with no power loss...

Are you talking about flow or volume?

Volume can be measured the same way a chamber is checked...

But once you've been doing this for over 10years you start to get the hang of it...

Where as many people thrive to get perfect port volumes, the fact of the matter is there is a lot more other important things to consider, as a few cc difference in a port is not going to tarnish a whole engines performance.

Im an odd type of guy...

Many years ago, back when we used flow benches, we were building a race engine, target power was just over 600hp....

Selected aftermarket heads for it, to which we copped a lot of criticism for as "they won't be big enough"

Done our port work to it, and got them flowed...

People litrally laughed at the results and mocked us...

Went ahead and bolted the heads on, and sent it to the engine dyno...

650hp...

So why would I choose to use a flow bench again?

So that was one engine....how do you know you havent gone backwards with others, or if the port is really noisy and turbulent

I dont really care for flow bench results, was just intrested to see what your RB results were

so dont take what im saying as critisism merely intrested

Why? So you can see how close you are to making the flow strip off the short turn. Or how about using a velocity probe to make sure you've got the cross sections right? Or see how well the flow is balanced around the periphery of the valve? Or seeing if the changes you make work better at low lift than high (or vice versa), or if you need to consider a different valve seat shape? etc etc etc.

Edited by GTSBoy

bit off topic but I read an interesting way to make a home flow bench using an afm and a vacumn the other day...

I'm sure you can figure the rest out but I thought it was rather clever...

Let me ask this...

Do you even know what your talking about?

The fact that you are using big technical words only tells me you have no idea what you are talking about so you are just trying to confuse everyone...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...