Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

awesome who did the ex gate for you? Looks really good. I'll keep an eye out for your results mate I hope your excited

Scotty did!!

Common for them rub on the top guide

Some people remove it

I just space it up with washers and use a s15 chain tensioner as it has finer adjustment otherwise you have to replace the timing chain and guides as it has stretched or the guides are worn and you have to remove the cover to do so which means engine out head off and int sump off

This engine did cost abit of money to build, its worth while taken it back to the engine builder making sure there is nothing going funny. But thanks for the input I will have a S15 tensioner installed.

By the way is the ATR28SS15 installed in yours? How does it feel driving around on road?

Worth taking it back to the engine builder if yours rebuilt not long ago and it's a engine fault

I've been very busy lately and haven't had a chance to put it in yet

will put it in 2-3weeks time

Evo should be tuned wed so should have results to put up

Got the evo 8 tuned today

Made 285awkw on 25.5psi with more in it but tuner was not happy with winding in more boost on stock block

Power was still climbing with more he boost he said

I reckon would have cracked 300kw on 28psi

I'll get a dyno sheet up later

Evo 8 stock block

Fic 1120 cc injectors

Deatchwerks 300 fuel pump rewired

Caltex eflex

K&n panel filter std airbox

Ces racing exhaust turbo back split dump pipe screamer

Gsc s1 cams

Hypergear slss2 hi flow evo 9 turbo 25.5 psi 4400-4500rpm

post-79144-0-65073900-1392189204_thumb.jpg

Edited by hy_rpm

It was a kando evo9 turbo with billet comp before and made 256kw on same boost 25.5psi by 3600rpm

I really want to see the 300kw number so on a rigoli dyno day I'll get him to try 28psi and see if I get there

I should start building evo turbos. :rolleyes:

That configuration stopped making power on a Rb25det at 383rwkws E85 proper manifold and externally gated.

Take 15kws off for factory manifold and 30kws off for internal gate. Then I should have 338rwkws.

Take the Evo's 4WD trans lose (assume identical to a GTR) is 12% then the 285awkws is 319rwkws out of a RB. There should still be another 18kws that you can squeeze out.

I'd like to see a Mivec head on a 6/7/8 engine using the larger aftermarket TS turbine housing . Taos mentioned the losses of std manifolds and IWGs on RBs and I imagine you'd lose a bit more if RB25s didn't have the inlet cam switch even as basic as it is .

Anyhow Mivec tames things down at low revs and I think even in std form one of the cams is hotter than earlier factory ones . Taming down means less loss with healthier turbos but all business when the revs are up and cam timing switches to lets go get em mode .

Evo 9s were getting pretty heavy for a 2L car and Mitsy were using all the easy things to avoid adding more capacity .

Lots of aftermarket manifolds around for Evos now and I think FP is doing a larger bore cast manifold which would be handy if it looks std .

Possibilities .

I should start building evo turbos. :rolleyes:

That configuration stopped making power on a Rb25det at 383rwkws E85 proper manifold and externally gated.

Take 15kws off for factory manifold and 30kws off for internal gate. Then I should have 338rwkws.

Take the Evo's 4WD trans lose (assume identical to a GTR) is 12% then the 285awkws is 319rwkws out of a RB. There should still be another 18kws that you can squeeze out.

Didn't you say smaller engines usually make similar outright power but there just need more boost usually

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...