Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, sin- said:

http://gtr-registry.com/en-r33-colours.php

With links to all VIN with production information.

gtr-registry?? as if that's as accurate as wikipedia :4_joy::4_joy:

thanks for the link though, i thought there were only GTR details on that site. good to know!

5 hours ago, Robocop2310 said:

Look at all the menacing, stylish and beautiful R33 GTRs. How can anyone say they're not the best looking GTR.

 

The front looks amazing. The rear looks too much like our late 90’s Chevy impalas which is why I don’t like it

1 hour ago, SeanR32GtSt said:

The front looks amazing. The rear looks too much like our late 90’s Chevy impalas which is why I don’t like it

You know what’s funny, in terms of the front I think it’s a close tie between the R34 & R33 GTRs for looks but the rear the R33 & R32 GTRs takes the cake as the rear of the R34 is just hideous in all aspects. 

Robocop, love the video mate we are the true R33 GTR enthusiasts on this forum. They are a showstopper and in years to come when R33 GTR values are through the roof and USA"ers are fighting tooth and nail for the true race bred king (33R) people can look back and say "they were right".

Obviously, the cars clearly at the top of the food chain in the Top 5 are the 33 GTR, NSX, FD3S S8 RX-7, Supra and the Nissan S15 Silvia (Paul walker has been interviewed saying this is his favourite car - amazing comment given all the supercars he has driven). I can also vouch for the S15 being a f**king thoroughbred hence why Im in the process of a full house build to unleash its GT potential, the handling is pure and it is the true definition of an all-round RWD road & track warrior.

\THREAD

 

 

 

6 minutes ago, BakemonoRicer said:

Robocop, love the video mate we are the true R33 GTR enthusiasts on this forum. They are a showstopper and in years to come when R33 GTR values are through the roof and USA"ers are fighting tooth and nail for the true race bred king (33R) people can look back and say "they were right".

Obviously, the cars clearly at the top of the food chain in the Top 5 are the 33 GTR, NSX, FD3S S8 RX-7, Supra and the Nissan S15 Silvia (Paul walker has been interviewed saying this is his favourite car - amazing comment given all the supercars he has driven). I can also vouch for the S15 being a f**king thoroughbred hence why Im in the process of a full house build to unleash its GT potential, the handling is pure and it is the true definition of an all-round RWD road & track warrior.

\THREAD

 

 

 

I know this is stated the obvious...but I freaken totally agree with you...again...! LOL

As for RWD Nissans, I also love the s15 best. Lovely nimble shape and with proper mods and suspension, handles like a dream around corners and it doesn't get enough recognition in my opinion. I think you should definitely build it into a road and track weapon as s15's are way under powered from factory. 

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, Robocop2310 said:

LOL...

This is freaken stuff...has R33 GTR looks in my opinion:

Now I know you are on drugs.  Yes, it looks awesome*.  No, it has nothing R33 GTR about it.

*Awesome as in a 12 year old boy would stiffy up over it.  It is a very childish/hotwheels car sort of concept to smash a Corvette and S20 together.

7 hours ago, Robocop2310 said:

You know what’s funny, in terms of the front I think it’s a close tie between the R34 & R33 GTRs for looks but the rear the R33 & R32 GTRs takes the cake as the rear of the R34 is just hideous in all aspects. 

I can’t agree more. The 32 rear end is phenomenal. The 34 seems kinda over dramatic. Like the tail lights seem twice that of the 32

It's like a couple of kids discovering bro love and kool aid.

"True racebred king" = R32

The 33 and 34 are riding on its coat tails, IMO 

 

Keep up the good work, and......go

 

images (3).jpeg

  • Like 2

MLR, Please explain how the R32 is the racebred king when it's far SLOWER than the R33 & R34....

Not too mention a lot less rigid, I mean.... it's like trying to plough a chick with a semi-flacid schlong, where as the 33 and 34 would be like ploughing with viagra!!!!!!!!! I know what I'd rather!!!

 

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, SeanR32GtSt said:

I can’t agree more. The 32 rear end is phenomenal. The 34 seems kinda over dramatic. Like the tail lights seem twice that of the 32

Exactly. The R33’s rear is evidently the evolution of the R32’s.

  • Like 1

Robocop, I'm definitely with you on that one mate.

f**k, we are definitely on the same page.

And the Nissan engineers would of thought..... let's make the 33 ass-end phatter, badder and sexier....akin to a beautiful voluptuous latina woman with curves in all the right places.

  • Like 1
13 minutes ago, BakemonoRicer said:

MLR, Please explain how the R32 is the racebred king when it's far SLOWER than the R33 & R34....

Not too mention a lot less rigid, I mean.... it's like trying to plough a chick with a semi-flacid schlong, where as the 33 and 34 would be like ploughing with viagra!!!!!!!!! I know what I'd rather!!!

 

Because the 32 was the car that owned the mountain, the reporters called it "Godzilla" because it was a giant (V8) killer.

What has the 33 or 34 done that equates to that.

Why is a XY GT HO worth the money it gets, Bathurst  history.

I could name a heap of other cars with mototsport history that bring in the dollars, but I won't.

Yes the 33 and 34 are famous because of F&F, yes the yanks love that shit, but long term, IMO the cars are topping out, some, like that low Klm GTR may hold some value if they are stored, but, IMO from following the car scene and what brings in the dollars, the average 33 and 34 will take a fall.

People buying up average condition cars thinking they are an investment are, again, from watching the market over the last 20 odd years, dreaming.

As for how they look, they are all dated, but I like the 32 the best, that's my opinion, you like the 33, thats your opinion, some people only like the 34, some people, like me, think the 35 looks like the boss and walks over everything before it.

Am I wrong, is my opinion wrong?

From reading your previous replies, I would hazard to guess that you would tell me my opinion is wrong.

Anyways, it's always a pleasure reading your replies

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I was using the wiring diagram I have So 12.74V is coming into the rear Fuel Pump relay as I measured.  When I turn the key to ON im getting 0.6V to the Fuel Pump plug; which i assume is backfeed voltage and doesnt include the 12V from ignition power.  The rear relay is working and being triggered.  From the diagram I clearly see the rear relay 80 = Rear Relay going into the Body/H loom (R-27) 27 = Fuel Pump plug going into the Body/H loom (T-20) 40 = Short Connector (R-27) I'm reading 12.74V on the blue/black wire which is the power for the Fuel Pump   From this diagram I can see the Ignition relay goes into the front and up to the ignition  2 = Fuel Pump Relay <1M> (R-27) 37 = ING Relay <1M> I started from the pump using this reference Which the way I read it (referencing Nissan wiring color codes) is: Pin Wire Color Function 1 B/P (Black/Pink) Ground 2 L/W (Blue/White)        ECU Trigger 3 SB (Sky Blue) Fuel Pump 5 L/B (Blue/Black) 12V Constant Tested SB to SB on Fuel Pump for continuity - confirmed Tested negative on Fuel Pump to 12V battery and L/B - confirmed 12V Pulled the relay putting 12V between Pin 1 & 2 and testing continuity on Pin 3 & 4 - confirmed relay   So that has me looking at this part of the circuit to understand whats happening here...and im still confused. From best I can tell; the disconnect is back to my previous diagram; between Ignition Relay and Fuel Pump Relay...which yet again; afaik is where the immobiliser should.    Thats what I was trying to explain to GTSboy; im not trying to fix it myself; yet I seem to have to get a Masters in Electrical Engineering (while im busy doing my actual job of DevOps & Cloud Engineering) somehow.  I just wanted more expert opinions; or more so that what I tested is correct and proves it to something around that area; to go back to the alarm tech (for a 3rd time) that he needs to fix it. He keeps telling me its not the alarm. He lives on the complete other side of the city so i understand not wanting to make a trip but as I said before if its the alarm it should be up to him to fix it. But he's adament its not; even though I pointed out the FP was immobilised through the original alarm. To my mind; it seems that the ECU is sending the signal; but the ignition is not getting 12V down the line.       
    • Maybe also really stiffly sprung track cars. Get the inside wheel up in a corner and all the fun stops. Also me sometimes (rarely) when I have to stand on the brake to convince the diff to drive the wheel that is still on the ground when I'm trying to diagonally get over severe driveway entrance, etc.
    • I feel like I'm missing something. You had an authorised installer come out and install a new alarm. Post install the car doesn't start, and you aren't getting the installer back to fix what they did wrong?
    • So either way it is gearbox out and look what is wrong?  I know about the input shaft bearing. Even before swap/new clutch the it sounded exactly like this: So is that inout shaft bearing or the other was installed backwards?  And can some please tell me the part number for that input shaft bearing? The gearbox is small box from R34 N/A and number is FS5W71C. Thank you  
    • I am yet to see anyone ever regret a quaife or helical. ...other than drifting/skidpan duties. I kind of want to upgrade my factory helical with a Quaife (but really it's not ultimately that different, and is a MASSIVE UNDERTAKING), that's how good the hype is about them, that I want to try them 'just to see'  
×
×
  • Create New...