Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone remember MS accusing David Coulthard of trying to kill him at Spa years ago? I know it was a long time ago but still, fairly rich of MS to say something like that and then pull an even worse stunt on Barrichello

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

ive been watching the pitlane incident over and over and cant help but think that the renault lollypop man saw the wheel off rosbergs car coming and moved, which accidently released his driver into the path of the force india. might just be the camera angle but it all happened at the same time.

It was a zoo in pitlane so who really knows. I happen to think that he saw the Renault coming and forgot in the heat of the moment that Renault were the next garage up...i think he assumed the car was going through and had already stopped. ??! But who knows, could be that silly, Renault have been next to them all year

How can you say it was a boring race? Even if you werent a Webber fan, different strategy, a penalty meaning one of the quickest cars had to race for position. But the chess game of lap after lap trying to pull that advantage was great viewing. Whether it was Webber, Massa or Vettle....it was graeat viewing. Seeing Rubens have a blast for the last few laps....i thoughts there was plenty to watch...a good GP

ive been watching the pitlane incident over and over and cant help but think that the renault lollypop man saw the wheel off rosbergs car coming and moved, which accidently released his driver into the path of the force india. might just be the camera angle but it all happened at the same time.

I was thinking the exact same thing!

book it into your calendar

i wonder if they will just get a slap on the wrist. I dont mind team orders it makes sense. I thonk it will be hard to prove it was a team order rather than massa using his brain and supporting the team. I think ferrari will say they gave massa the info and let him make up his mind.

Good to see ferrari closing the gap will be interesting to see how close they are at spa

loving the webber leap! reminds me of the schuey leap and it didn't hurt his win record! also reminds me of schuey 'conducting' the italian national anthem until some weiners took it the wrong way and got all upset about it so he stopped. fun police strike again! they can't deny it's a jaunty little tune. :D

ive been watching the pitlane incident over and over and cant help but think that the renault lollypop man saw the wheel off rosbergs car coming and moved, which accidently released his driver into the path of the force india. might just be the camera angle but it all happened at the same time.

Apparently that's what happened, supposedly he was distracted. I don't mean to sound harsh but isn't it the job of the lollipop guy to not be distracted, even when it's crazy? I'm not saying it's easy but he's the one who's trusted to keep his head in those situations.

lol. word :/

he is certainly getting the height to get the job done on the little bastard.

Can you just imagine it? Webber *accidentally* clips Vettel, Vettel goes ape-poo, a punch-on breaks out resulting in Vettel going off the balcony WWE-style.

I disagree. The Schublocker is quite capable of running over a nun and claiming that he had to do it because she was on the racing line, or whatever he defines as the racing line. I was quite surprised that he did apologise because I've seen him righteously defend all sorts of crap over the years. I don't recall him apologising for anything (at least voluntarily) before. Maybe he's mellowing in his old age. Or maybe he's afraid of payback from Rubens. THAT I would pay much to see.

He knows the rules. Or at least you'd think He should

Pretty weak how He initially says- "I'm allowed to change line once in defence", completely ignoring the other rule about not 'crowding cars to the edge of the track'

Most ppl have probably read on PF1 by now about how if there'd been enough time in the race to review the video evidence, Mike would have been black flagged

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...