Jump to content
SAU Community

The Cops Are Ramping It Up - Leave The Skyline At Home!


Recommended Posts

Ok fellas...cops have been told to up the ante so watch out!!

how so they are already pulling over everything with 4 wheels and a cannon zorst.. guna start going for the pushbikes too?

  • Replies 234
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

how so they are already pulling over everything with 4 wheels and a cannon zorst.. guna start going for the pushbikes too?

Ha ha ha...mate, soon you'll get defected for having rusty roller blades! :)

Ha ha ha...mate, soon you'll get defected for having rusty roller blades! :)

Or a screw

Of which btw - we are all still waiting to see the defect notice or whatever with a screw listed on it - as you said.

Or a screw

Of which btw - we are all still waiting to see the defect notice or whatever with a screw listed on it - as you said.

HA AHA HA

The second and third fines was just a fine letter saying $292 for driving a unroadworthy vehicle. That's the problem. Nothing listed. Why do you think I lost it?

It's because I still have a valid roadworthy and just cleared it a few weeks before and then they fine me again.

Rubbish - every canary i've had lists the items that are unroadworthy.

How can you just say a car is "unroadworthy" without specifiying what needs to be fixed?

I think we busted that mystery.

Rubbish - every canary i've had lists the items that are unroadworthy.

How can you just say a car is "unroadworthy" without specifiying what needs to be fixed?

I think we busted that mystery.

it sounds like he got the fine they like handing out not actually a defect my mate got one a couple weeks ago for too low but no defect just infringement notice.. which is stupid cos he doesnt have to show anyone that the car has been raised etc.

can someone clarify does the defect notice need 5 items for a major? someone told me this and i find it hard to believe i got 2 things listed and "inspection incomplete" which vicroads had never heard of inspection incomplete..

:banana:

it sounds like he got the fine they like handing out not actually a defect my mate got one a couple weeks ago for too low but no defect just infringement notice.. which is stupid cos he doesnt have to show anyone that the car has been raised etc.

can someone clarify does the defect notice need 5 items for a major? someone told me this and i find it hard to believe i got 2 things listed and "inspection incomplete" which vicroads had never heard of inspection incomplete..

:banana:

one big enough flaw will give you a major if the Office sees it as a safety issue, IE; tyres on belts. it is up to the officers discretion.

The second and third fines was just a fine letter saying $292 for driving a unroadworthy vehicle. That's the problem. Nothing listed. Why do you think I lost it?

It's because I still have a valid roadworthy and just cleared it a few weeks before and then they fine me again.

If that's the case, keep the RWC and the fine.. don't pay it and take the matter to court. How can you be fined for driving an unroadworthy car without being told what is unroadworthy on it?

If that's the case, keep the RWC and the fine.. don't pay it and take the matter to court. How can you be fined for driving an unroadworthy car without being told what is unroadworthy on it?

Exactly.

You cannot defect a car and say it is Unroadworthy - without actually stating what the problem is.

That is just retarded.

in the last week, i've only seen 2cop cars. whats the big deal with everyone ? your car is a magnet, leave it at home,

if its legal to the eye, no problems.

thanks for that..

maybe it would be nice to go for a drive given the good weather

i agree nismoid but that is what they are doing just handing out $292 fine as an infringement notice.

I would definitely contest all of these fines. If they don't NOU the car I don't see how it's possible to issue fine for Unroadworthy vehicle. Any decent solicitor should be able to get you off that if you ask me. Roadworthiness is a safety issue so fines irrelevant IMO as NOU is to force person to make car safe. I fyou give out fine without NOU then your defeiting the purpose. Doesn't make any sense to me and I would think court would agree.

Rubbish - every canary i've had lists the items that are unroadworthy.

How can you just say a car is "unroadworthy" without specifiying what needs to be fixed?

I think we busted that mystery.

Ash,

Please read my posts again. I got a canary initially - yes, of course I got all the yellow sticker and the list of things to fix - yes. However, the subsequent fines did not involve a canary. You may recall that I wrote, I can't believe they can fine me again for having an unroadworthy vehicle and $292 only days after I got a full RWC and had cleared it with Vicroads.

This is why I am upset. So to recap, canaried - cleared it, then fined again after that without canary.

Exactly.

You cannot defect a car and say it is Unroadworthy - without actually stating what the problem is.

That is just retarded.

Thank you...now you feel my anger...the pointed to various things as I had mentioned before and then just said it's unroadworthy even after I showed them my RWC I got a few days before that.

thanks for that..

maybe it would be nice to go for a drive given the good weather

i agree nismoid but that is what they are doing just handing out $292 fine as an infringement notice.

+1

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...