Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So I have finally booked the GTR in to get the PT6262 fitted.
I will finally have my own results to post in here..

Not chasing a power figure, will be adding new Cams, Cam Gears, Fuel system & ECU
starting out on 20psi and see how it all goes.

Going in my 34 GTR
6 boost Manifold, 50mm Progate & 6262 with .84
Haltech PS2000 ECU & IQ3 Logger dash to replace the MFD
New fuel system & some cams, cam gears and a few other bits and pieces.
Will post up a before & after run, looking forward to having a bit more power.

Going in my 34 GTR

6 boost Manifold, 50mm Progate & 6262 with .84

Haltech PS2000 ECU & IQ3 Logger dash to replace the MFD

New fuel system & some cams, cam gears and a few other bits and pieces.

Will post up a before & after run, looking forward to having a bit more power.

Capacity?

Comp ratio?

Cams?

Exhaust size?

Going in my 34 GTR

6 boost Manifold, 50mm Progate & 6262 with .84

Haltech PS2000 ECU & IQ3 Logger dash to replace the MFD

New fuel system & some cams, cam gears and a few other bits and pieces.

Will post up a before & after run, looking forward to having a bit more power.

Why the PS2000 and not the Platinum Pro plug-in?

Found this from Jan 25th 2013.

 

Car is 2001 Audi A4 1.8T

 

New 6262 CEA 620rhp @ 42psi (red)

Old  6262         520rhp @ 35psi (blue)

5857                420rhp @ 28psi (green)

Err, no? The different colours are hp, torque and boost, it's just a new 6262 versus and old 5857 in that comparison.

Capacity?

Comp ratio?

Cams?

Exhaust size?

Capacity: 2.6L

Comp ratio: Standard

Cams: HKS step 1's 272 8.7 lift (I think)

Exhaust: 4" dump into custom 3.5" exhaust with no mufflers

Will be tuned on E85 from the drum, the car is not my daily anymore and for $2,50/L I don't have to worry about watching the fuel prices jump up and down.

Why the PS2000 and not the Platinum Pro plug-in?

Because I'm not sticking with RB26 and don't wanna upgrade ECU's again.

Will utilize some of the additional channels from the PS2000 in the future.

A couple of people have also asked why the Logger IQ3, it's for same reason. buying now to setup so I don't have to replace in the future.

My aim is just to have a bit more poke when I press the accelerator down, I'm not chasing a power figure nor am I looking for a world record.

  • 2 weeks later...

My r34 gtr came back from Micks Motorsport making 501AWKW 671AWHP on 28 psi on united e85 with a precision 6766 bb and on bp 98 it made 370AWKW 495AWHP 20 psi

the engine is currently a Nitto 2.7 stroker ,ported head a set of 270 deg cams, Precision 6766 and a Turbosmart hyper gate we will push for more soon, will put a graph up when I go to the workshop the motor was built buy Dahtone Racing

  • Like 1

So I have finally booked the GTR in to get the PT6262 fitted.

I will finally have my own results to post in here..

Not chasing a power figure, will be adding new Cams, Cam Gears, Fuel system & ECU

starting out on 20psi and see how it all goes.

im a bit surprised actually I thought this car was a pretty serious piece of top dollar machinery already. any reason you decided on the precision?

im a bit surprised actually I thought this car was a pretty serious piece of top dollar machinery already. any reason you decided on the precision?

Hmm

Nah, my car is factory stock still. Only mod is the Fat Pipes exhaust.

I went precision to be different, turns out plenty of others have gone down the same road since this thread is 87 pages now.

Got a roller bearing 6262 to go on a mates 25/30 and it doesn't seem to spin as freely by hand as the GT35's I've had in the past. It actually hardly spins at all when idling. Is this normal or is there an issue somewhere

i have only ever seen this on BIG turbos as the air is passing past the turbo but not enough to spin it. Was on a 2J. I am 100% certain this isnt the issue here tho.

Got a roller bearing 6262 to go on a mates 25/30 and it doesn't seem to spin as freely by hand as the GT35's I've had in the past. It actually hardly spins at all when idling. Is this normal or is there an issue somewhere

That's strange, can you show us a video?

JEM tuned a 33 GTR the other week.

RB26+6466+E85+35psi=604awkw.

So it was a 6466!? I saw the pic and figured it might have been a 6466 or 6766 but I got no response when I asked - I *love* 6466, they are clearly an awesome turbo. Any word on how it spools on the RB26? Should beg JEM for a dyno plot post, it would be very very interesting

So it was a 6466!? I saw the pic and figured it might have been a 6466 or 6766 but I got no response when I asked - I *love* 6466, they are clearly an awesome turbo. Any word on how it spools on the RB26? Should beg JEM for a dyno plot post, it would be very very interesting

:dry:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...