Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For a single entry that is very impressive.

(looks at T51R) :ermm:

Yep I reckon the PT6466 CEA is Precision's best moment, it basically always seems to deliver - the better the setup, the crazier the result. Looking forward to Scr48's result... should drive very nicely on a 3litre and obviously the potential is there for massive power, even the .84 will make a lot but if it ends up not being enough then going to a 1.15 hotside would allow for unrestrained silliness :)

I'm not 100% sure yet, but one thing I am not sure of is if someone puts one on a high flowing RB (ie, RB30 with aggressive headwork and cams) if they will flow enough per psi to keep the big engine happy - they seem to be keen on high pressure ratios for their power, but that might just be the cars they've been on so far. Thats the only reservation I have at all, and it may not be justified.

Man the precision turbos appear to be the best bang for the buck. I know EFR and VGT are newer but you can't deny living proof!

FP HTA are very real competition, the 6466 is a particularly good offering however - but from FP you have the "rest" of the awesome turbos. Some of the best value for money turbos I could think of for small/medium sized engines in order would be (some real rough and realistic E85 power ranges):

FP GT3076R HTA - For 330-380kw @ wheels

FP GT3582R HTA - For 370-450kw @ wheels

FP GT3586R HTA - For 430-500kw @ wheels

Precision PT6466 CEA - For 500-600kw @ wheels (basically it just seems to do so much so well!!)

FP Super 94 HTA - For 580-680kw @ wheels (same as above - but larger scale)

Those are my favourite considering price, reliability, fitment, spool and power.

the 6466 is popular with the Supra fans so there are some results for 3.0L motors but results on the RB26 are pretty hard to find. The general consensus from what I read was don't bother with the 6766 as the 6466 is so damn good and punches above it's weight.

Our set up still has more in it, I've heard these turbos love 35psi+ so when we get it to hold spark we will go back on the dyno to see how it goes.

Yep I reckon the PT6466 CEA is Precision's best moment, it basically always seems to deliver - the better the setup, the crazier the result. Looking forward to Scr48's result... should drive very nicely on a 3litre and obviously the potential is there for massive power, even the .84 will make a lot but if it ends up not being enough then going to a 1.15 hotside would allow for unrestrained silliness :)

I'm not 100% sure yet, but one thing I am not sure of is if someone puts one on a high flowing RB (ie, RB30 with aggressive headwork and cams) if they will flow enough per psi to keep the big engine happy - they seem to be keen on high pressure ratios for their power, but that might just be the cars they've been on so far. Thats the only reservation I have at all, and it may not be justified.

Yep I reckon the PT6466 CEA is Precision's best moment, it basically always seems to deliver - the better the setup, the crazier the result. Looking forward to Scr48's result... should drive very nicely on a 3litre and obviously the potential is there for massive power, even the .84 will make a lot but if it ends up not being enough then going to a 1.15 hotside would allow for unrestrained silliness :)

You and me both! Hopefully Friday!

Capacity: 2.6L

Comp ratio: Standard

Cams: HKS step 1's 272 8.7 lift (I think)

Exhaust: 4" dump into custom 3.5" exhaust with no mufflers

Will be tuned on E85 from the drum, the car is not my daily anymore and for $2,50/L I don't have to worry about watching the fuel prices jump up and down.

Because I'm not sticking with RB26 and don't wanna upgrade ECU's again.

Will utilize some of the additional channels from the PS2000 in the future.

A couple of people have also asked why the Logger IQ3, it's for same reason. buying now to setup so I don't have to replace in the future.

My aim is just to have a bit more poke when I press the accelerator down, I'm not chasing a power figure nor am I looking for a world record.

So finally got around to getting my car sorted, only to run into more problems.

I ended up with a Platinum Pro BNR34 specific model, and 3.5" dump not a 4"

Everything else above was fitted and turns out should've updated the valve springs too, thinking the 272 drop in cams would be ok with stock valve springs.

After a problem with the CAS & Valve float when you add any boost the car will be getting some supertech springs & possibly a Ross trigger kit and heading back for more boost.

What I ended up with was 494hp @ 13.5psi

I'll post up the dyno sheet later tonight when I get home and take it out of the car.

Another upgrade I will look at will be updating the coils or fitting a CDI & pencil coil kit

The 6262 sounds great, spools hard but I can't wait to get some boost into it.

The goal is still 20psi, I have no real power figure aim but judging on what it made @ 13.5psi its gonna go close to or over 600hp quite easily.

I'll keep everyone posted,

Cheers

Noy

Took a snap of the graph from the 6466 on the RB26 that JEM tuned the other month.

Soooo much midrange for the power output.

1380269364291.jpg

That is crazy, still 2.6?

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2

Paul, I hope you are going to plot this for reference :)

I've done a quick eye plot ;)

I'd love to drive it. Dyno only tells half the story.

Errr and I sold those exact turbo which I was gonna put on my own car :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
    • Nice, looks great. Nice work getting the factory parts also. Never know when you'll need them.
    • Thanks @jtha7 I will have a look around tomorrow but it is a prick of a spot. These are some photos i tried taking 
    • I take it that the knock retard is from bearings tapping a little tune? Thicker oil is a fragile bandaid. You need a much bigger oil cooler and probably the bigger pump being discussed.
×
×
  • Create New...