Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I know it's the shittest pic in the world but this should give you an idea of 6262 power potential. We ran it up at just under 2 bar (1.96 I believe) and it went 710rwhp (530rwkw) and 776Nm.

Stock bottom end RB26 with 1.2mm head gasket and Grex 9.1mm cams

20131003_173129_zps562ef6cf.jpg

I know it's the shittest pic in the world but this should give you an idea of 6262 power potential. We ran it up at just under 2 bar (1.96 I believe) and it went 710rwhp (530rwkw) and 776Nm.

Stock bottom end RB26 with 1.2mm head gasket and Grex 9.1mm cams

Fark! :blink:

Still running the 1200cc injectors or have you upgraded?

I know it's the shittest pic in the world but this should give you an idea of 6262 power potential. We ran it up at just under 2 bar (1.96 I believe) and it went 710rwhp (530rwkw) and 776Nm.

Stock bottom end RB26 with 1.2mm head gasket and Grex 9.1mm cams

20131003_173129_zps562ef6cf.jpg

Why do you post this result you will destroy my wallet!!!

Holy molah!

*chucks the twins in the bin*

I know right hahaha

I know it's the shittest pic in the world but this should give you an idea of 6262 power potential. We ran it up at just under 2 bar (1.96 I believe) and it went 710rwhp (530rwkw) and 776Nm.

Stock bottom end RB26 with 1.2mm head gasket and Grex 9.1mm cams

Awesome result man :D Got to be happy with that, had no doubt that a 6262 would make that kind of power but still cool to see somewhere here throw it down in a GTR along with a decent power delivery :) Going to be an animal!

I am rapt that people in Oz are embracing these (Precision CEA and FP HTA turbos), I wish people in NZ would join this decade too :(

I have been prattling on about them for YEARS, and just get chortled at like people think it is inflated dyno results or whatever. Had a bit of that a few years ago on this forum but now it's the new black.

  • Like 1

Its a damn good result and to be honest that dyno figure would be quite conservative as well.

We get the 200SX tuned by Yavuz and at about 430rwkw i have run 137mph at Eastern Creek in complete street trim. I am talking stereo and all, so with a 484rwkw your most certainly going to be running into the 9's at over 140mph

I am really looking forward to seeing what the 6766 twin scroll does on our car now. I got a 1.0 rear so it will be interesting to see just how responsive it will be

With regard to traction, throw a couple of washers on top of the diff mounts and point the nose of the diff down ie between the diff and cradle. Made a pretty massive difference to the car after we did that. I know it can be fun to drive without them, but nothing beats being pinned back into the seat and not being able to move :)

My main thing was that i wanted it be strictly streetable and wasnt fussed about the dyno figure - not that its too bad at all! Therefore I went for a 6466 with .84 twin scroll - I was concerned this would be too big as I was thinking to go for a 6266 originally - although very happy with this setup which is super responsive compared to most cars I have been in, not to mention torquey-as down low due to the RB30.

It has been running for some time on 13psi run in tune which it did 308rwkw on pump 98 - then 20psi on e85 which it did 365rwkw for about 2 weeks.

Even on 20 psi the car is a wild drive on the streets - stepping out in 4th gear once is hits about 4000rpm as if it was second gear (still waiting on half decent tyres to show up).

If I upgrade the catch can (which is small as I wanted it to be hidden) they could push 34psi but doubt I will ever need to, nor bother going to the troubble as this thing has been in the making for over a year now!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
    • The downside of this is when you try to track the car, as soon as you hit ABS you get introduced to a unbled system. I want to avoid this. I do not want to bleed/flush/jack up the car twice just to bleed the f**kin car.
    • But again, the engineers said your cast aluminium would be fine based on the load that would be stretching that section. Same load stretching the bolts in a flex (not the twist), with a much smaller cross sectional area than the original part you've broken. It's why you'd need to be using higher strength bolts, but that's just making up for the strength you lose with less area...
×
×
  • Create New...