Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Buraz said:

What's everyone's results with 6262 precision??

My is out of puff at just under 440kw and 26 psi on a 2.8l stroker

Mine has gone 560kw at the hubs. 440kw sounds significantly lower regardless of the dyno. Got a graph? Any restrictions?

Ahhh okay!! That's a big difference for sure. No restrictions whatsoever, it's a split pulse 6 boost and twin gates too. 17.5psi springs!!

 

Car hammers no doubt about it and I'm more than happy. Just thought I'd share my results with you guys and see other results

Oh wow that's a massive difference!! Is it same rear housing as mine?? After talking to a few people now, this thing is only a tiny turbo and tell me it's about right.
But yours is an unbelievable result. Still a 2.6?

  • 5 weeks later...

Mine should be hitting the dyno next week hopefully 

previous tune was 645kw at 34psi with a 7175 gt42 on a hks 2.8

few changes since last tune such as 100mm plazmaman cooler and turbo1 custom twin scroll manifold with twin 38mm tial gates,

should come on nicer now then it did with the old greddy stainless manifold

  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...
On ‎25‎/‎05‎/‎2017 at 10:04 PM, SiR_RB said:

Mine should be hitting the dyno next week hopefully 

previous tune was 645kw at 34psi with a 7175 gt42 on a hks 2.8

few changes since last tune such as 100mm plazmaman cooler and turbo1 custom twin scroll manifold with twin 38mm tial gates,

should come on nicer now then it did with the old greddy stainless manifold

How did it go?

I am quite interested to see how much difference a manifold makes.

I have a 6766 on a T88 Greddy manifold and have access to a 6 boost if the need arises. The car makes 460 odd rwkw @30psi on Unigroups dyno and traps 138mph but I still want more.

Have been told I should have gone the 6466 as its better suited to an RB26

Edited by ido09s
On 26/06/2017 at 11:22 PM, SimonR32 said:

The 6262 sillyness is never ending... New cams just got the most power and torque it's ever made

20170626_145138_zpswxu7yhfh.jpg

Lol what..

760 awhp on a turbo rated to 705hp.. not questioning your results but that is going to be overspeeding by like 30%

 

Very impressive that it's still happy pushed that hard. I'm interested in your exhaust back pressure and compressor outlet temp numbers.

Dynapack hubber gives a possible 5-10% inflated reading.. However simons back to back results with his setup and different cam combos are awesome and the car speaks for itself performance wise.. 

Its unfortunate that the next time its dynoed it wont be a true back to back unless you can sweet talk sean and he has access to the dyno still

 

Edited by azzada1
6 hours ago, burn4005 said:

Lol what..

760 awhp on a turbo rated to 705hp.. not questioning your results but that is going to be overspeeding by like 30%

 

Very impressive that it's still happy pushed that hard. I'm interested in your exhaust back pressure and compressor outlet temp numbers.

Technically it's rear hub hp, not awhp. I don't think they have an overspeed (it's not an EFR after all)

Turning the dyno on SAE correction it shows up 797hp so god knows how much it's making at the flywheel but definitely more than the turbo is rated at. Never measured backpressure in exhaust but air temps after the intercooler are more than reasonable

30 minutes ago, SimonR32 said:

Technically it's rear hub hp, not awhp. I don't think they have an overspeed (it's not an EFR after all)

Turning the dyno on SAE correction it shows up 797hp so god knows how much it's making at the flywheel but definitely more than the turbo is rated at. Never measured backpressure in exhaust but air temps after the intercooler are more than reasonable

its frustrating that no compressor maps are available for precisions because a turbo compressor power rating is usually based on an efficiency below 58% or even the stonewall flow (flow choke) of the compressor. this is the speed that part of the assembly reaches sonic speed and flow basically cannot be increased any further by spinning it faster or altering the downstream pressure. thats why the choke line is vertical in a compressor map. (although note that maps from garret state efficiency below 58% is the end of their displayed map, and they consider that point "overspeeding") It's not necessarily when it wants to fall apart, but the efficiency falls over and then finally the compressor won't flow any more due to sonic shock waves inside the compressor inlet or volute causing a choked flow condition.

its interesting that the Precisions seem to be happy well past the flow the manufacturer rates the compressor for. whereas Borg Warner made their turbines strong enough to cope with the choke speed of the compressor they paired it with and not much more as its outside the design parameters.

Edited by burn4005
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • just an update to this, poor man pays twice  Tried sanding down the pulleys but it didnt do the trick. Chucked another second hand alternator in the na car which I got for free off my mate and its fixed the squelling. Must have been unlucky with the bearings.    As for my turbo car, I managed to pick up a cwc rb alternator conversion bracket + LS alternator for 250 off marketplace, looked to be in really good nick. Installed it , started the car and its not charging the battery.... ( Im not good with auto elec stuff so im not sure if this was all I needed to do but I verified such by using a multimeter on the battery when the engine was running and I was only getting 12.2v )   I had to modify the earth strap for the new LS alternator , factory earth strap was a 10mm bolt which did not fit the bolt on the LS alternator which was double the size so I cut it off , went to repco bought some ring terminals that fit, crimped it onto the old earth strap and bolted it up to the alternator , started the car and same issue. Ran like shit and was reading 12.2 at the battery.  For a "plug and play" advertised kit thats not very plug and play but alas.  My question is , am I missing something ? Ive been reading that some people recommend upgrading the stock 80 amp alternator fuse to a 140 amp but I dont see how that would stop the alternator charging especially at idle not under load.  Regardless ive pulled it out and am going to get it bench tested by an auto elec tomorrow but it would be handy to know if ive missed something silly or have done something wrong.   
    • My wild guess is that you have popped off an intake pipe....check all of the hoses between the turbo and the throttle for splits or loose clamps.
    • Awesome, thanks for sharing!
    • To provide more specific help, more information is needed. What Android screen? What is its wiring diagram? Does the car's wiring have power at any required BAT and ACC wires, and is the loom's earth good?
    • So, now all you need to do is connect the 2 or 3x 12v feeds into the unit to permanent 12v, ACC 12V and IGN 12V that you can find in the spot behind the stereo, and the earth, and then it will switch on with the car.
×
×
  • Create New...