Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

Well in the next few months i am hopefully going to be the owner of an R32 GTSt after an extended hiatus from the Skyline scene.

What i will be wanting to do with it, is eventually do a V8 conversion, now i understand that getting this approved through the RTA may prove difficult (even impossible) hence why i am wanting to research teh topic well before i go down that path.

Also, for anyone that has done this type of conversion, what's the best motor? I'd be looking at a Holden motor so would it be LS1/2/3? L98? I could also potentially have access to a "cheap" crate motor from the states, but not sure of what is available there, and would at this stage prefer to keep it local.

I know a few guys on here have done it, but i am under the impression they have only been used as track cars, nothing for street yet?

Cheers

Nick

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318419-v8-conversion-for-r32-gtst/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi Guys,

Well in the next few months i am hopefully going to be the owner of an R32 GTSt after an extended hiatus from the Skyline scene.

What i will be wanting to do with it, is eventually do a V8 conversion, now i understand that getting this approved through the RTA may prove difficult (even impossible) hence why i am wanting to research teh topic well before i go down that path.

Also, for anyone that has done this type of conversion, what's the best motor? I'd be looking at a Holden motor so would it be LS1/2/3? L98? I could also potentially have access to a "cheap" crate motor from the states, but not sure of what is available there, and would at this stage prefer to keep it local.

I know a few guys on here have done it, but i am under the impression they have only been used as track cars, nothing for street yet?

Cheers

Nick

Good luck with it Nick, it would surprise allot of enthusiasts when you take off from traffic lights and it grumbles like a V8

Have you read all the threads on this available through search? E.g.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ls...on-t207355.html

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/R3...on-t187852.html

"LS1" and "LS2" should give lots of results.

Have you read all the threads on this available through search? E.g.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ls...on-t207355.html

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/R3...on-t187852.html

"LS1" and "LS2" should give lots of results.

I have followed Bezerks thread yes. And will continue to do so.

As for that other thread..starts off ok but then turns into a "Could an RB do Bathurst" thread...

Why not keep the engine "in-house", ie a Nissan engine - VH41 or VH45, far superior to the horrible lump of US cast iron.

Never really considered it to be honest. I'm fairly keen on doing an LS* conversion as i'm familiar with the motors and like the way they perform

Why not keep the engine "in-house", ie a Nissan engine - VH41 or VH45, far superior to the horrible lump of US cast iron.

I'd like to see someone get 300+Rwkws from an aspirated Nissan V8.

the Lsx engines are by far more compact than the VH engines as well.

We're presently in the process of dropping a VH41 from a Cima into an R32 race car.

We'll be using twin turbos from an R32 GT-R to give it a bit of extra oomph.

So far the issues we've run into are the firewall and gearbox adaptor. The firewall is going to need a little massaging and the adaptor is going to have to be fabricated to handle a 25DET box, nothing that won't be achievable.

The turbos will end up facing high and forward and we'll need cutouts on the bonnet to make them fit, but we'll have about 2cm on either side for strut tower clearance.

I think an NA version is possible for a road car but the LS is a better option for you as there are quite a few threads available on the builds.

Good luck with the project.

the Lsx engines are by far more compact than the VH engines as well.
That would be because they are still using pushrods to activate the camshafts, rather than multi-valves and twin OH camshafts.

It's about time GM brought their technology into the latter part of the 20th century, before they even consider the 21st century.

That would be because they are still using pushrods to activate the camshafts, rather than multi-valves and twin OH camshafts.

It's about time GM brought their technology into the latter part of the 20th century, before they even consider the 21st century.

LS engines have excellent engine weight/power ratio and as mentioned above engine size/power ratio. There're even lighter than all the RB engines and have much more power potential.

Pretty good for old ass tech. IIRC the low-tech LS3 sh!ts all over the the DOHC hi-tech BOSS in the FORD.

The number of camshafts doesn't determine the quality of an engine.

Hi Guys,

Well in the next few months i am hopefully going to be the owner of an R32 GTSt after an extended hiatus from the Skyline scene.

What i will be wanting to do with it, is eventually do a V8 conversion, now i understand that getting this approved through the RTA may prove difficult (even impossible) hence why i am wanting to research teh topic well before i go down that path.

Also, for anyone that has done this type of conversion, what's the best motor? I'd be looking at a Holden motor so would it be LS1/2/3? L98? I could also potentially have access to a "cheap" crate motor from the states, but not sure of what is available there, and would at this stage prefer to keep it local.

I know a few guys on here have done it, but i am under the impression they have only been used as track cars, nothing for street yet?

Cheers

Nick

If you can afford it get the LS7...427 cubic inches will fit anywhere a LS1 will fit ,around 500 neddies ...boooyah!!!!

I'd like to see someone get 300+Rwkws from an aspirated Nissan V8.

the Lsx engines are by far more compact than the VH engines as well.

No. But they've been supercharged to make that much, and relativly cheaply at that. Yes, there was a R33gts-t on here that had the VH45 conversion done, in QLD from what i remember. He ended up running a superharger on it, running methanol fuel, and some other fancy jazz. from what i remember it was in the low 10's at willowbank.

And yes, i deliver. spent a while going through my SAU history, but found the 20 page thread about it

linkie

enjoy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...