Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It's for the track only. Would it be classified as a semi-slick or full slick? Only doing track days at the moment, although I would like to be able to enter Time Attack and Supersprints etc.

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

they are not CAMS approved semi slicks. http://www.camsmanual.com.au/pdf/10_gen_req/GQ06_Schedule_E_Q111.pdf

not the same hoosiers that we have seen in Aus before, they might be a new model no-one has requested yet

I've been enquiring about bringing over some Nitto NT-01s through Price USA from Discount Tire Direct. NT-01s are the same compound as Toyo R888s with a more aggressive pattern. They work out at $280 ea posted in a 255/40/17 which is the same price as Federal RSRs here.

I've been enquiring about bringing over some Nitto NT-01s through Price USA from Discount Tire Direct. NT-01s are the same compound as Toyo R888s with a more aggressive pattern. They work out at $280 ea posted in a 255/40/17 which is the same price as Federal RSRs here.

If the NT-01's perform anything like the R888, you're probably better off with the Federal RSR IMO.

I had a set or R888s on the 180SX. They were the worst performing semi I've ever used. By a country mile.

Edited by hrd-hr30

I had a set or R888s on the 180SX. They were the worst performing semi I've ever used. By a country mile.

what where you using them for? and what was the problem you had with them? Were they new ones or used?

They are the grippiest tyre I have ever used.... however I was using them for motorkhana on concrete on a 1200kg car. My only complaint was they had too much traction - I could not throw the front end a full 180 deg with them on. They had a lot more traction that my Federal RS's - I haven't tried RSR's yet, hopefully they are a bit softer and have more grip from cold.

My understanding is if you are doing circuit work with them it needs to be light (or 'over tired') car, otherwise they get too hot and go off. For short sprints, hill climbs etc they seem to work very well.

Edited by samstain

what where you using them for? and what was the problem you had with them? Were they new ones or used?

They are the grippiest tyre I have ever used.... however I was using them for motorkhana on concrete on a 1200kg car. My only complaint was they had too much traction - I could not throw the front end a full 180 deg with them on. They had a lot more traction that my Federal RS's - I haven't tried RSR's yet, hopefully they are a bit softer and have more grip from cold.

My understanding is if you are doing circuit work with them it needs to be light (or 'over tired') car, otherwise they get too hot and go off. For short sprints, hill climbs etc they seem to work very well.

grippiest tyre compared to what though? have you tried A050s or DZ03G or RE55s? comparing them to federal RS of course they will be better. they should be better than the RSRs too. but for a supposed proper semi they underperform pretty badly. for instance on an R35 GTR which was the last time I used a set they were slower around oran park (RIP) than the standard dunlop high performance road tyres.

No I haven't tried the A050s or DZ03G or RE55s, but I would expect a GG r888 to be gripper than a RSR - especially from cold - to say the 888 is 'the worst performing semi' and not as good as a RSR is a bit out there I would have though without a bit of background on where it was being used.

It depends what you are using them for and the power/weight/tyre size it has...

Fair enough 888's on a high power GTR doing multiple circuit laps are probably going to over heat and go off unless driven very accuratally, however if its a light or underpowered car they can work very well. Likewise if your doing hill climbs and autocross type events they come on very early where as and RSR can take at least a few hard corners to come on - at motorkhana the only time I really got the federals to perform was when my brother was sharing the car with me (2 spots up the queue) and it was a +30deg day.

I had a brand new set of 225/50r16 888's on my S14 for a while and the traction was unbelievable - with careful throttle control it would launch as hard as my brothers 99sti, where as even when new, the RS's were no better than a good road tyre when cold (hopefull the RSR's are slightly better).

anyway, im in the market for new tyres at the moment - tirerack do not do anything suitable for what I want (unless I change to 16" rims in which case I can get AO48's), what other online stores do resonable postage to aus? or has anyone had any luck with forwarding services?

Also, how have people gone with build dates - perhaps in the states turn over is large enough that is isn't a problem, but I'd hate to get supplied 4-5 year old tyres such as what often comes up on ebay in aus.

Edited by samstain

the point is, RSR is not a semi slick, and Toyo 888 is. The Toyo should be significantly faster than RSR, especially if you are using the soft compound.

Federal's semi slick is FZ201.

the point is, RSR is not a semi slick, and Toyo 888 is. The Toyo should be significantly faster than RSR, especially if you are using the soft compound.

Federal's semi slick is FZ201.

yep and he was comparing them to the RS which is another step below the RSR. the RS is just a road tyre with the RSR being the kind of 'cross over' high performance road/almost a semi slick type tyre.

either way of the proper semi slicks out there the R888 is way down the list. yes on light cars around 1000kg they perform fairly well but we are talking TRACK (circuit) tyres for skylines (1300kg-1600kg) with anywhere from 250hp to 800hp. the 888s are just not suitable.

I don't know of anyone having trouble with old stock from tyre rack. they are pretty reputable. but you're right, you need to watch out for people shifting 4 or 5 year old tyres as 'new' simply because they haven't been used yet.

The RS is just a road tyre with the RSR being the kind of 'cross over' high performance road/almost a semi slick type tyre.

The only differnece between the 2 is a slightly softer compond (180 V's 140 tread wear from memory) and a slightly stiffer sidewall on the RSR - that and the fact that the RS's are no longer made as far as I am aware, they were superseeded by the RSR a couple years ago. You might be thinking of the SS for thier 'just a road tyre'.

Edited by samstain
  • 2 weeks later...

Has anybody tried the federal semis?

I;ve been running a set on the race car and they have been very good. hard to tell if they are better than the dunlop without back to back testing on the same day on new tyres....but I'm happy enough (especially since the price is sensible) that I will keep using them.

they are not generally available yet, hopefully they will be sooner rather than later!

like i said, I haven't run them back to back with the dunlops...

I have run the Federal Hards back to back with the Kumho Mediums, they were 0.3 sec slower at Morgan Park (1.20min lap).....very good result against one of the best softer tyres IMHO

  • 2 weeks later...

3 years sounds like the edge of acceptable to me. I would be very unhappy if they are track tyres, roadies are probably ok for 3-5 years.

in practice, the amount of light and heat where they are stored are more important than time, but you obviously don't know how they were stored.

and with track tyres, the number of heat cycles (times you have raced on them) is more important than time or storage

The more tyres people buy from the US, the more expensive tyres in Australia will get. You need to support the Australian official importers of the tyres because the more they buy from Japan, the cheaper they can get them for which is why they are cheaper in the US. The more you buy from the US, the cheaper US prices will get in comparison to Australian prices. I really wish stoogebags would stop doing this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...