Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The compressor map shows it's better everywhere... Where are the 3076R are only different up the higher boost end!

ok not identical, but not hugely different, the results from that subaru thread show a similar thing. Most the gains are to be had at high boost levels.

ok not identical, but not hugely different, the results from that subaru thread show a similar thing. Most the gains are to be had at high boost levels.

50lb/min pretty much all the way through the pressure range is fairly significant, considering that translates to around 50hp!

so is any one actually running any of the new GTX turbos,

inparticular the GTX35 on a 26?

Can pretty much get the whole kit for 3700 ... includes turbo, manifold, wastegate, water lines, gaskets etc, just need a dump pipe and intake

sounds alright to me

GTX3076R doesn't look like a big enough step to justify itself and the GT3076R is a little small for a 3litre, anyway :P

I'm not sold on the GTX turbos yet, and await the EFR7670 with interest...

Given you don't still have the stock turbo it seems that you aren't JUST after response, have you driven something with an RB30 in it yet?

haha touche! my setup as is makes me want more response... i'll be checking out al's car before i make a 100%

Haha I try ;) I think folks underestimate the things, RB30s tend to bring spool down 500rpmish which is what people mostly seem to pay attention to, but its worth remembering that the spool is on a bigger engine too - so even if you had a 500rpm laggier turbo on the RB30 it'd argueably *feel* as responsive as the more responsive turbo on the RB25, trick is its actually that much more responsive.

Terrible use of English, but might still make sense? I reckon I'd find a GT3076R annoying on an RB30 after having one on an RB25, and a GT2835 isn't THAT much different to a GT3076R really. For what its worth a twin scroll T04Z on an RB30 makes my car feel like a laggy sack.

Definitely experience it for yourself, but the difference between the two motors is much more than saying "half a litre" justifies.

Haha I try ;) I think folks underestimate the things, RB30s tend to bring spool down 500rpmish which is what people mostly seem to pay attention to, but its worth remembering that the spool is on a bigger engine too - so even if you had a 500rpm laggier turbo on the RB30 it'd argueably *feel* as responsive as the more responsive turbo on the RB25, trick is its actually that much more responsive.

Terrible use of English, but might still make sense? I reckon I'd find a GT3076R annoying on an RB30 after having one on an RB25, and a GT2835 isn't THAT much different to a GT3076R really. For what its worth a twin scroll T04Z on an RB30 makes my car feel like a laggy sack.

Definitely experience it for yourself, but the difference between the two motors is much more than saying "half a litre" justifies.

I have read this post 3 times and my head hurts.

Why would you find a 3076 on an RB30 annoying? too linear and not enough of a hit?

I've encountered some results from a GTX3582R which I know the conservatives and such forth on here will potential throw toys at - don't shoot the messenger please. This is a "full retard" EVO running running 13:1 compression and race gas on around 30psi. Its stock displacement and clearly not set up for low down torque so much as going apesh1t:

gtxmapvsps2bar.jpg

Apesh1t achieved, the most generous that reading could be is crank hp which is still mental for a T3 flanged turbo which spools anywhere near that quick - laggy on a 2litre but an RB30 would make it perfectly useable.

I think that's a great result.

It still has a good 3k of usable power after the bullshit steep ramp. Though you wouldn't want to get caught below the boost threshold.

Dunno that it'd work too well on an rb30. Remember you have to keep the revs below 4k becasue it's only a truck engine.

S2000 and GTX 3076 with Tial .82 hsg

http://www.s2ki.com/...c=788561&st=875

Thats very,very impressive for 1bar and pump fuel.

And looking at the 500hp graph, it certainly shows there is much more left in it. Doesnt dive over at all.

Ill be doing a direct bolt off/on comparison between the GT35 and GTX35 in the coming months.

thats got to be predicted flywheel. the GTX35 flows about the same as a T04Z and thats not capable of 920@ the hubs.

Probably flywheel though usually it says it and you see a TCF field, but even then 920hp at the fw is taking nothing from it

Dunno that it'd work too well on an rb30. Remember you have to keep the revs below 4k becasue it's only a truck engine.

You're trolling right? Either that or a retard? Truck engine? Don't go over 4k?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's restrictor pills in the stock boost control hoses. That's how they set the amount that was bled off and hence the "high" boost setting. The usual mod in the day was to remove it and send the "high" boost setting up to about 14 psi.
    • Thanks Duncan, that's the best info I've read. Furthermore after learning about the PCM programming side controlling the factory boost solenoid, the purpose of the solenoid is to "bleed" boost when pin 25 is earthed, thus allowing spring pressure in the wastegate actuator to overcome diaphragm boost pressure, thus closing or reducing the position of the wastegate flap creating more boost as the turbo is able to spin faster. It's pretty cool to see a designated Pill to do exactly this, would have liked to have seen it with a tiny filter over the end for those moments in vacuum.  The constant bleed pill has now been removed completely from the system and solenoid boost control has been restored once again.   Case closed 😂
    • The wideband reading is meaningless if it's not running. Why are you using shitty old sidefeeds on any engine, let alone a Neo? What manifold and fuel rail are you using to achieve that? Beyond that, can't help you with AEM stuff as I've never been their ECU/CAS combo.
    • Manual boost controllers (where a little of the boost was bled off) were quite common back in the day, because they were cheap and easy. Generally they had a manual adjustment screw rather than being fixed like yours. Down side is they always bleed boost, not just when you want them to so an electronic boost controller that uses a solenoid will have less lag.
    • Hello , im new here and i have A31 home build  RB25det neo stock eng / turbo  aem ems 2 blue connector  aem 3.5 map aem cas disk aem wideband connected to ecu  355 lph pump 550 nismo yellow injectors side feed aftermarket regulator  and won’t start with base aem tuner basic tune eventually flipped cas 180 degree so it triggers on correct stroke not in exhaust cycle  Now it won’t start Wideband reads 10 and 11 at lowest fuel setting  and will share calibrations soon for aem tuner i think something is wrong in aem tuner    please if you have any information, am very grateful         
×
×
  • Create New...