Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Great work Shaun and Stao,

I'm interested in seeing how this progresses. For those who doubt the theory consider bernoulii's theorem.

First assume the exhaust gas is not getting compressed (density is constant) and flow within the system is ideal, then the flow out of the head must equal the flow out the turbo. If the area to the turbo is halved then its velocity must increase by a factor of approximately 1.4 (Bernouli's theorem, Conservation of Energy). Momentum is then consequently increased by about 40% => 40% faster spool time.

So in an ideal theoretical world - it works great but a lot of R&D is required to reduce ineffeciences.

Stao: Is this sort of setup possible in one of your super street turbos? ;)

You mention twin scroll manifold....youre shutting off 3 cylinders until 4000rpm?

Twin scroll turbo, single outlet manifold for this setup. You want to make all the gas go through the turbo faster by making the area smaller until it starts to create backpressure in which case you begin opening the valve on the turbo slowly until it eventually is open entirely flowing entirely AFAIK.

i still don't understand how this works, the wheel and housing stays the same size, in my head it's like putting a restrictor in any part of the manifold, the diametre decreases, so the velocity increases through the restrictor, but as soon as the diametre increases again, it simply slows down again. i know this "restrictor" is immediately before the turbo, but it's still the same volume being pushed through the same area around the wheel.

i can only think there is some merit to the idea of the pressure being directed onto a more efficient part of the blades.

guys, my set up is a full divided twin scroll 6 boost amnifold and a gt4094 full twin scrioll turbo, what has happened is part of the twin scroll in the exhaust housing has been removed and fitted with a flap. the flap closes the rear most port of the twin scroll housing but at 45 degrees, this does 2 things . directs all 6 exhaust gases through the front scroll of the turbo exhaust housing, and 2, because its at 45 degrees reduces heat build and helps to increase the gas flow.

you do not do any mods to the manifold what soever.

as mentioned above, i run a link g4 ecu, i am going to fit a linear electric actuator, wired through a relay and driven by the ecu output using rpm to determine the gate opening piont.

thanks again for the contributions guys. will update as and when

You mention twin scroll manifold....youre shutting off 3 cylinders until 4000rpm?

The exhaust gases from 3 of the cylinders on one side of the manifold travels straight through to one scroll of the turbo housing and the exhaust gases from the other 3 cylinders enter their own scroll of the turbo housing but are redirected to join the same scroll of the turbo housing.

This redirecting occurs within the turbo housing itself.

This way the exhaust flow from all 6 cylinders are using only one scroll of the twin scroll turbo until the point that the valve is opened.

I am guessing when the valve does open you might get a small dip in boost pressure as the exhaust flow has to start from scratch on the second scroll?

I would assume so Harey, unless you can open it slowly.

My design didnt modify anything, it's removable and between the TS manifold and TS turbo housing as I wanted to keep the TS when the flap was open. I ended up not making it as the GTX4508 turbo I designed it to go under was too big to fit in the engine bay with 3 inches added to the manifold height.

I would assume so Harey, unless you can open it slowly.

My design didnt modify anything, it's removable and between the TS manifold and TS turbo housing as I wanted to keep the TS when the flap was open. I ended up not making it as the GTX4508 turbo I designed it to go under was too big to fit in the engine bay with 3 inches added to the manifold height.

Ah ok so your design is an piece that sits in between the manifold and turbo housing? So would raise the turbo up by the amount of your part.

GTX4508 turbo lol ur a nutter :)

Interesting bit of gear. I've also made a prototype with the similar sort of swing valve, the problem I've found is the exhaust manifold pressure on the flapper valve was too strong for the actuator to engage, which it never opens. But there are ways around it.

Can just you just use a very long lever with lots of mechanical advantage and a strong solenoid?

i still don't understand how this works, the wheel and housing stays the same size, in my head it's like putting a restrictor in any part of the manifold, the diametre decreases, so the velocity increases through the restrictor, but as soon as the diametre increases again, it simply slows down again. i know this "restrictor" is immediately before the turbo, but it's still the same volume being pushed through the same area around the wheel.

i can only think there is some merit to the idea of the pressure being directed onto a more efficient part of the blades.

You are using a twin scroll turbo so the turbo doesn't stay the same size.

Wouldn't it be better to switch it on load rather than rpm?

Ultimately you need a 3D map with rpm and boost (not load).

Edited by Rolls

now i want one :(

maybe the next build.

im already schemeing ways of doing the flap internal to the manifold rather than the turbo housing.

and trying to make it so the gasses dont load it up too much to open with an actuator.

hmmm, time to start drawing.

You are using a twin scroll turbo so the turbo doesn't stay the same size.

ok so the twin scroll stays separated right up until exiting the wheel? i was under the impression it was only separated til just before the wheel.

i'd like to see this thing tested on track cars, additional moving parts with track temps makes me nervous.

i would rather see a back swept design, which is spring loaded (adjustable) which is opened by exhaust gases, once the exhaust gases build up enough pressure, the flap starts opening, once they reduce, it closes back up. the design could be much simpler, with less parts to fail.

  • 1 month later...

The only reason why you can't do that Nisskid is due to the fact that it would eliminate the purpose of having the twin scroll turbine

housing as you wouldn't be able to block the center where the gas switches from one side to the other. You would how ever be able to run it like a standard v-band housing, even though you would be utilising a modified twin scroll housing and a divided manifold.

Hows it going with this anyway? Any more results? Looking at doing this with my build in the near future.

ok so the twin scroll stays separated right up until exiting the wheel? i was under the impression it was only separated til just before the wheel.

If you did that the turbo still sees the same mixed exhaust pulses, it has to be separated the entire way otherwise it won't be of any benefit, hence the separating takes up space and the AR is reduced for the same physical size.

By the way has anyone thought of using a stepper motor, similar to those found on the intakes of some cars in reference to boost pressure? Just use the ecu to put out a Pulse width modulated signal in accordance to boost.

You don't need to take it too full boost as its only when the engine is trying to begin to spool a turbine that takes the longest, so say if desired boost level is 24psi just make it full open at 14psi.

By doing that you eliminate any of the issues with exhaust restrictions, boost spikes, etc as the system would be regulated via the wastegate. Realistically rpm wouldn't really matter as its only operating on boost pressure imo.

Also the stepper motor running of a pulse width would be able to be opened gradually rather than straight open and shut

Having just read a thread about tuning VCT turbos on a 1uz, you need to remember that when the valve is shut, it has a big effect on the Volumetric efficiency of the engine, fuelling and timing changes will be massive compared to when the valve is open

I think the guy who did it ended up using an exhaust manifold pressure sensor and having the valve reference it to boost pressure. Basically he said you can make heaps of boost down low, but if the valves(s) are shut to make the boost, then the motor wont make any power. BTW it was all ecu controlled.

Edited by Adriano

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I just changed the timing belt on my RB25DET NEO and wanted to get some opinions. I’ve been super cautious, did a lot of research, and took my time. I’ve driven the car, and it runs fine. After warming it up, I revved it to 8000 RPM a few times—no issues, everything held up.   After the drive, I heard a noise that I think is either the clutch or possibly a tight accessory belt. It’s not constant, just comes and goes.   I took the timing cover off to double-check everything:   Belt is on properly, Tensioner is tight, Did the 90-degree twist test—belt isn’t too tight or too loose.     What still worries me is that I noticed the belt seems to sit a little toward the front edge of the gears, especially on the idler pulley. It even looks like it’s slightly coming off the edge there. Is that normal?   My old belt (5 years old, ~3,000 miles) also showed a bit of wear on that same edge, so maybe it’s just how it sits? I’m probably overthinking this, but since it’s my first time doing this on a NEO and the engine is forged, I really don’t want to mess anything up.   Also, I’m thinking of swapping to a clear front timing cover with the glass window. Would you recommend NITO or HPI? HPI looks reputable and their covers have 2.5mm thickness, but not sure if there’s a real difference between the two.   Any advice or reassurance would be much appreciated!
    • 40 grit sounds about right, to start. You make some decent cuts/damage in the coating with that, then rapdily scale up to maybe 80 and 120 for the bulk of the actual removal, then fine it off to 180 or 240 perhaps. No need to go any finer than that, and maybe no need to go even as fine as that. Wrap it on a big block and have at it. At least on the hub face.
    • Do the GKTech rear lower control arm mount relocation, and either alloy subframe inserts or very stiff subframe bushes. Traction is going to be at a premium!
    • Hello,   My name if Frederick, i'm 30 years old and I live in Belgium, Europe! I used to have a Nissan 370z daily but since I got a company car I turned that into my seattime driftcar. About 3 years ago I also wanted something older with more feel, so I got an R32 GTST with an rb26 engine. I am now getting the rb built to have around 800hp and it's close to being finished. I'm very excited for how it will drive and how driveable it will be! Regards, Fred!
    • Appreciate the insight! Talked to some local folks and they basically told me "it's not that deep." As long as the threading on the inside matches what's at the steering rack, everything else can be constructed-to-fit. There are full aftermarket kits I can use - probably better for my car overall since it's lowered.  Example: GKTech M14 Super Adjustable Inner Tie Rod Set - Nissan Skyline R32 R33 R33, 240SX, 300ZX, 350Z / Infiniti G35 M14I-TROD-2 gktM145-TROD gktM14I-TROD - Concept Z Performance (These can be packaged with their "high misalignment" tie rod ends).
×
×
  • Create New...