Jump to content
SAU Community

Oil Analysis - Who Can Read The Results


Duncan
 Share

Recommended Posts

not sure, the machine shop can decide. the mains are pretty bad though and there is scoring so odds are it throw away. probably bent too, they normally are after this sort of thing.

this isnt meant to be the report my engine failure thread though, I'm sure there is one of those somewhere....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

pulled the motor apart today, the the main bearings were f**ked although not spun yet, and the big ends were almost perfect (just some foreign damage, I guess as the mains died). Good call Dan

so 1 point to the oil analysis.

Does anyone have results for a motor just after run-in?

Who left the main girdle loose? That's about the only way you could do that kind of damage - either that or incorrect clearances.....like miles off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Duncan, change your engine builder and I guarantee all of your engine failure worries will go away. Its not just about how they build, its the advice they give that prevents these things from happening.

My first engine failure with them was the same sort of thing - bad clearances.

2nd was due to crap in the cooling system - my radiator literally came back brown and overheated cracking a head gasket.

3rd was bad rings (my theory is they re-used the old rings and only swapped over the head gasket when it blew).

In the end you can only blame yourself for taking it back to the same place. You will probably delete this post, either way its food for thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe, the shop you are thinking of have never built a motor for my race car. They have built 2 other motors for me and both are lasting well. And I'll never delete a post unless it breaks a rule :D

Dan I'm waiting for the engineers report...the workshop beleive oil starvation would affect the mains but not the big ends (initially). I don't understand that point of view so I had a 3rd party look into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe, the shop you are thinking of have never built a motor for my race car. They have built 2 other motors for me and both are lasting well. And I'll never delete a post unless it breaks a rule :D

Dan I'm waiting for the engineers report...the workshop beleive oil starvation would affect the mains but not the big ends (initially). I don't understand that point of view so I had a 3rd party look into it.

Yeah... NAH!

Big ends always go before mains, look at all the GTR's that crack their oil pumps. Big ends die, not mains!!!

"Elite racing" sound like they are on the right path, either loose girdle or massive clearance issues

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^ yeah i lunched a one in cats car due to a dodgy sump and pickup arrangement (ASR or high energy built me one that fixed the issue) and it burnt the big ends due to oil starvation. soon as it (rb26) spins a bearing the cranks bend like a bannana and often crack near the radius.

Ive havent seen a 26 with damaged mains after oil starvation unless it was driven for an unreasonable distance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have results for a motor just after run-in?

we dont do engines anymore (no time) so dont do any more oil analysis, but based on previous experience after the first oil and filter change our are pretty close to being normal (no excessive anything) in all instances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

damn, id be depressed if i went through as many engines as you have :( good on you for keeping a positive attitude though!

i know some ppl that get depressed if their fuel pump decides to die and that's nothing compared to what your dealing with!

just a quick Q, what was your oil pressure like before you pulled the motor down as compared to when it was a fresh engine? ie did u notice a gradual drop in average oil pressure levels between track days?

Edited by snozzle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

was about to ask this. surely putting the block through the hot tank would wash any old bearing material out?

or would sum of the oil galleries be farely hard to clean out?

but then again when u pull a block out of the hot tank you blast the shit out of all the galleries with the compressor so surely that would quiet easily blast out any shit the tank missed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dave (and everyone else for that matter) this thread is not about why my engine failed. That discussion will take place off the internet with the workshop involved.

This thread is about oil analysis, and what typical and atypical results look like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Duncan, thats good news about the workshop, i stand corrected on that matter. Either way you made the right choice!

Dave (and everyone else for that matter) this thread is not about why my engine failed. That discussion will take place off the internet with the workshop involved.

This thread is about oil analysis, and what typical and atypical results look like.

this may help;

http://www.oil-lab.c...sis_Reports.pdf

this guy's website is quite informative in terms of giving acceptable limits. there is also a forum where you can submit your oil analysis and get some feedback too.

http://www.bobistheo...id=50&Itemid=56

forum:

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=postlist&Board=3&page=1

Edited by SECURITY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the results for Noels engine after 500km (same oil the whole time) and from memory the lead and copper were both under 1ppm

Iron was about 25 or so (which you'd expect from ring bed in)

I have the results on the computer at work so if I get a chance/remember, I'll post them up

Any amount of lead is bad. The crank should not make contact with the bearings so the lead should be virtually non existent unless there is something chewing away at the top layer. Every 'oil starvation' failure I have seen has always shat the big ends, never the mains. The only time I have seen mains wear on every single one is:

A: Customer fit clutch incorrectly causing the crank to be locked against the gearbox (twin plate). After 10,000km or so the thrust bearing took it's last rotation. ALL the mains were completely gone

B: Girdle left loose by previous engine builder - every main was cactus

Oil starvation will wear journals 3/4/5 first but due to the fact the mains feed oil to the big ends, even when starved, the mains are the first to get oil again and the big ends get starved more. Also due to the fact the big ends have 100 x the load on them and the squishing effect removes oil very quickly. It takes A LOT to blow every main. Then you said you have every big end pretty much ok. That tells me something was wrong with the mains, not just something WENT wrong.

I know this isn't supposed to be an engine failure thread but hoping to give you a better understanding of what may have caused it.

I personally use Wear Check Australia for our oil analysis. They cost ~$40 and are pretty clear to read. The results you showed were clearly engine fail but they suggested that it may have been normal for a running in engine. Lead and copper are big fail indicators. Iron not so much

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I'm just about to run an a new engine i was wondering what the advantage is in testing run in oil, as you would expect there to be all sorts of metals (EDIT! I mean High Levels) in there as things bed in (obviously you don't want to much bearing metals though). If you were only going to do one analysis would it be better to do it on the first change or say after 500-1000km's?

Edited by D_Stirls
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really. On the first one you will see higher levels of iron but nothing too serious. If the engine is assembled clean, then there should be nothing more than that.

Doing an oil test after the first oil change (at say 500-750....or even 1000km) is probably the best way to go about it. Also with run ins, whenever I build an engine for a customer, I always do road run in. Dyno run in works but you need to factor in problems that may not appear in the first few hours of engine operation. Leaks etc. Take it slow. Do small runs at first and gradually go further after each check. Never leave the engine in one load point...always be accelerating or decelerating, never stay on cruise for too long and never idle for long. After 500km not so important.

If you change the oil at 500km, you can drive it 100km more and do an oil test then if you like. Make sure you take the sample just after the engine has reached op temp otherwise any particles will settle. Never poke the tube all the way to the bottom of the sump either...for the same reason.

You get the results back in a few days and hopefully you'll be near 1000km by then and ready for tuning

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well....since the new build is finished I guess I will have some figures to post in the next few weeks, I intend to get the run in oil checked for interest. Will also check the proper oil after run in, tune etc.

BTW failure reason for the old motor was identified, a bolt head from the cam baffle bolts were found in the oil pump intake. Also explains the high (5x) iron on the oil analysis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

interesting about the e85 and oils..

those running e85 what engine oil do you recommend for a high hp rb25?

very interesting, i dont think many people know about this, id be interested to no what oils people are using too, as i was considering a which to e85 now that i have a pump near home with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Go to SP mufflers and get the muffler of size you want and make a nice mid muffler. It's about that simple! I have 2x 3.5 Magnaflow straight through Mufflers and while it's pretty loud with the Varex open, it's quiet enough with the Varex closed. You can also buy off the shelf Magnaflow straight through mufflers as well. You also have a turbo to quiet the car down too. Don't overthink it. Buy my extra Magnaflow muffler sitting on a shelf doing nothing (buy it new, ignore this part)
    • Centre-offset muffler under the floor, same as stock. Just....3.5". The change from straight pipe there to centre-offset will mean that you need to remake some of the pipe (add a bend or two).
    • Hey guys. So my R34 GTT has a custom 3.5” exhaust (done by previous owner) with a high flowing cat, and then just a Varex cannon muffler on the back. The car does drone alot and is really loud even on highway driving just cruising, as you can imagine due to the Varex muffler basically being a straight through with the valve open. As much as i love a loud RB, it can be a bit much with no other muffling in line and just driving casually. I wanted to lower the volume output on the exhaust a bit, as well as remove the drone (probably a way to do both at once), and was going to do it all myself as I am a fabricator and have done exhaust work in the past, so the fab work isnt my issue, im just not sure on the right product or type of product to use to get the job done, and i doubt an exhaust shop would be wanting to help me as they wont be making any money from helping me, unless they supplied the product? Anyway any help or guidance in best way to approach this would be awesome   Thanks in advance
    • Meh, whilst the Honda is a "really" good car and has potential if you want to drop coin on, it was uninspiring for me to look at, but, it did serve its purpose and is now in the boys hands, his happy, his girl is happy, as she wasn't to keen on the noisy old Patrol, and most importantly, the Minister for War and Finances is extremely happy that her "little baby boy" (6'2 nugget who is currently training to be a copper, which will make 3 coppers in the immediate "circle of trust") has a well sorted reliable car that doesn't guzzle diesel Me, I'm more than happy with the NC MX5 that I replaced it with, it's a fun little car that I like looking at, like driving, and yes..... I do like the fact that the maintenance and modifications that I have done/will do are plentiful and relatively cheap, well........ while staying naturally aspirated slow that is, and that's all I really need for a fun little daily, I can rev the 5hit out of it rowing through the gears and never really break the speed limit  In saying that wicked word, "modifications", I've already ordered something for some noise and an additional "3 ish" horse powers, or whatever it gives, in the form of a header, and, a new set of "cheapo" BC coilovers that are already sitting in the shed waiting to get put in, I had the same BC's in my old NB and found they were fine for the street, hwy, and the occasional track days I did in it, they have 6kg front and 4kg rear springs which is about 10% stiffer than the stock springs which I found worked well for their price  I've also already been in touch with MX5 Mania in Dural, so once the header is on it will get a ECUTek RaceROM tune there (I cannot rev match for 5hit, and I loved the RaceROM rev match and FFS in my old 86 "RIP") In other, maintenance news, I put some new sparkler plugs in it, and have a new set of DBA Street series pads to put in over the next day or so, I'm running the DBA street series in the SS and Honda and really like them, they work great and are not dusty at all I've also booked in a few days leave over this weekend to give me 4 days weekend do some paint correction and give the leather seats some conditioning and interior some Bissell and steam cleaning OCD lovin', the carpet and interior looks clean, but from my experience with the Bissell IRT carpet, and the steam cleaner IRT trim, looks can be deceiving I've also found that finding a detachable hard top is proving problematic, the main reason why I didn't like the NC initially was the power retractable hard top that I seen them with gave the roof line a weird look, the detachable roof though looks good, and is a same shape as a NA/NB hard top, similar, but unfortunately not the same as it has different fixture point on the front, so fitting a easy to get NA/NB detachable hard top is no bueno New Old cars are fun, cleaning, hunting and playing around brings much joy How are your beasties going? Do you still have the Skyline with the LS???, or Barra??? that you were playing with
×
×
  • Create New...