Jump to content
SAU Community

Kando Dynamics Turbo

SimonR32

By SimonR32,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

raZ1911 Proficient

raZ1911

Posted
Posted

You answer your own question the h has a bigger turbine wheel I had the td06h-20g on my 20 and was seeing full boost at 4200 18psi so it's only a few rpm if you want bigger numbers

Not really. Ill word it better this time lol.

In terms of 350KW going the 12CM housings on the TD06SH 25G and the T67 25G both can do it but would the TD06SH bigger wheel (more lag) would it be worth it for the extra power it make. As if it makes say 15more HP with much more lag then it wouldnt be worth it?

But i cant find much info comparing the 2 or in 12cm housings, so im just asking opinions.

  • Replies 6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Dale FZ1
Dale FZ1

My 30DET is now running TDO6H 25G, budget build with Hybrid manifold and 50mm Turbosmart gate. Turbine is the 11 blade option with 12cm housing. Tighe camshafts correctly dialled. Track car, chasin

R31Nismoid
R31Nismoid

And r33_racer or whatever also had around that figure too? Maybe it was 380? (struggling to recall)

T04GTR
T04GTR

are theese rubbish china turbos with a badge thats made in japan?

Posted Images

Roy Grand Master

Roy

Posted
Posted

If you were looking for a easy 350KW on 98 would it be better to go as TD06SH 25G 12cm or T67 25G 12cm?

Is that a fair statement? An easy 350rwkws on 98? I suspect it would take 20-22psi on a well tuned RB25 to make that power....I still go by Dyno Dynamics numbers...I dont know if that makes a difference but I think you can say the T67 and TD06H-25G will both make an easy 310rwkws at 16-17psi. The "H" version may make in the vicinity of up to 10-15rwks more?

I am not sure that going to a bigger exhaust housing will also give you significantly more power as the 10cm doesnt appear to be a restriction. Agree that if you went from a restrictive housing to a more free flowing housing you would bet results.

I suppose I am a bit of a scratched record but think we should all be careful about throwing numbers around, especially numbers that may be a little high

blags Veteran

blags

Posted
Posted

The td06 is a good turbo fairly responsive yet gives good top end the td06h-25g is bigger then the t67

Well I noticed one of the guys is making 400+ kw off his t67 and my aim is around 300-350. So maybe I need to look at the 20G instead of the 25G?

Roy Grand Master

Roy

Posted
Posted

Simon's car is an animal and makes whatever power it does...its a big number because the thing runs 11 flat on the quarter and blitzes around race tracks. He has various dyno sheets from various shops where the car has been run. He runs a 50:50 E85 mix, so that helps with power, but still not a full E85 tune (is there much difference in outright power? I got no idea...but I know its helping his power over std 98)

I think it was a dynapak that put it at 410rwkws. A dyno dynamics put it at 480rwhp (or 360rwkws)...so as BSA GTScoT and others have been saying...do your own research and look at other sources rather then just SAU. If you want 350rwkws from an RB25 I think you need to push a 25G based turbo.

GTScotT Grand Master

GTScotT

Posted
Posted

the way I see it, the last thing the h wheel will do is add power anywhere in the band. What it will do is add a little more scope to the compressors maximum flow.

Simon has already noted that his compressor has maxed out before the hotside, what more do you need?

that being said its no science to see the h wheel will be application specific. For example if i wanted blitzing 350kw and i put a t67 on a bad ass rb34 but the thing maxed out at 5500rpm, i would know the restriction was in the hotside. I would then try move to a larger housing, and if that did not yield the result inwas after I would then move to a h optioned unit.

Obviously the idea is bring the thing on later and keep it on longer. It would be trial and error between 10cm H or 12cm L2 in my eyes.

And again Simon is reving his to 8 with no sign of turbine cap. Now lets all forget about the h turbine until someone builds that bad ass rb34 i mentioned.

SimonR32 Grand Master

SimonR32

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Simon's car is an animal and makes whatever power it does...its a big number because the thing runs 11 flat on the quarter and blitzes around race tracks. He has various dyno sheets from various shops where the car has been run. He runs a 50:50 E85 mix, so that helps with power, but still not a full E85 tune (is there much difference in outright power? I got no idea...but I know its helping his power over std 98)

I think it was a dynapak that put it at 410rwkws. A dyno dynamics put it at 480rwhp (or 360rwkws)...so as BSA GTScoT and others have been saying...do your own research and look at other sources rather then just SAU. If you want 350rwkws from an RB25 I think you need to push a 25G based turbo.

Roy is pretty much spot on here... 410kw at the hubs on a happy hub dynapak 360rwkw on a dyno dynamics roller.

My mix has a huge advantage over a 98 tune. It probably would not make any extra power with E85 as we can wind as much timing as we want in without detonation as it is

the way I see it, the last thing the h wheel will do is add power anywhere in the band. What it will do is add a little more scope to the compressors maximum flow.

Simon has already noted that his compressor has maxed out before the hotside, what more do you need?

that being said its no science to see the h wheel will be application specific. For example if i wanted blitzing 350kw and i put a t67 on a bad ass rb34 but the thing maxed out at 5500rpm, i would know the restriction was in the hotside. I would then try move to a larger housing, and if that did not yield the result inwas after I would then move to a h optioned unit.

Obviously the idea is bring the thing on later and keep it on longer. It would be trial and error between 10cm H or 12cm L2 in my eyes.

And again Simon is reving his to 8 with no sign of turbine cap. Now lets all forget about the h turbine until someone builds that bad ass rb34 i mentioned.

I think it may be maxed out, don't know that for sure... May be another issue, either way I don't really need any more power

In saying that, I may be going from Nistune to Vipec and dropping some cams in soon... Someone stop me FFS

jet_r31 Mentor

jet_r31

Posted
Posted

Is that a fair statement? An easy 350rwkws on 98? I suspect it would take 20-22psi on a well tuned RB25 to make that power....I still go by Dyno Dynamics numbers...I dont know if that makes a difference but I think you can say the T67 and TD06H-25G will both make an easy 310rwkws at 16-17psi. The "H" version may make in the vicinity of up to 10-15rwks more?

I am not sure that going to a bigger exhaust housing will also give you significantly more power as the 10cm doesnt appear to be a restriction. Agree that if you went from a restrictive housing to a more free flowing housing you would bet results.

I suppose I am a bit of a scratched record but think we should all be careful about throwing numbers around, especially numbers that may be a little high

24-25psi and that would the least amount in that turbo sizing..

cheers

darren

Roy Grand Master

Roy

Posted
Posted

... may be going from Nistune to Vipec and dropping some cams in soon... Someone stop me FFS

Why the change from Nistune to Vipec? I Interested to know what cams you are looking at as well. I would be tempted to stick with the std inelt cam and go baby 256 exhaust cam

SimonR32 Grand Master

SimonR32

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Why the change from Nistune to Vipec? I Interested to know what cams you are looking at as well. I would be tempted to stick with the std inelt cam and go baby 256 exhaust cam

Remove the AFM from the equation... The Z32 is out of its depth already and makes the cooler piping a lot better!

Cams would most likely be a set of poncams.

jet_r31 Mentor

jet_r31

Posted
Posted

Remove the AFM from the equation... The Z32 is out of its depth already and makes the cooler piping a lot better!

Cams would most likely be a set of poncams.

cheap ponnies on american ebay atm mate autocat51 is the seller..

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Tomei-PonCam-Cams-Camshaft-ECR33-R33-RB25-RB25DET-/190486773888?pt=Motors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item2c59e58080

Neo

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Tomei-PonCam-Type-B-Cams-Camshaft-R34-RB25-RB25DET-Neo-/360291534189?pt=Motors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item53e30c856d

I got Neo ones and they where $640 to my door...and delivered fast..

cheers

darren

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • joshuaho96
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      In the US almost everything is E10. It can't exceed 10% by much or fuel systems have trouble adapting. At the same time because MTBE, MMT, and TEL are all banned they need as much ethanol in it as possible to boost octane.
    • Kinkstaah
      NC MX5

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I was mostly jesting. In my experience (and probably only my experience) the R34 GTT physical airbox space is actually too small to flow the amount of power it wanted. By sealing the box, I made it so it could only be fed by the ducts themselves. So you can seal it up and get nice cold air which IS good, but at a certain crossover point: More Hot Air > Less Cold Air I don't think you're at this point. In my case merely ducting the hot air intake with a very focused set of ducts counteracts the fact it's in a V8 engine bay. More cold air obviously best. The solution looks great.
    • The Bogan
      NC MX5

      By The Bogan · Posted

      Nah, the OEM CAI pipe is still installed behind the bumper, it is about 5" x 3" oval at the engine side, tapering down to a 3" pipe behind the bumper where it gets all the ambient air it needs Engine side of radiator support OEM intake pipe "oval hole" that is right in front of the filter My OEM NC1 CAI pipe: From NC2 onwards, below pic, they come slightly smaller at 2.75" diameter with corrugations and a resonance chamber to reduce intake noise, lucky for me my NC1 has the bigger noisy one, LOL   Basically, the "sealed" airbox will just get ambient air from a 3" pre filter intake tube that is the same size, 3" as the rest of the intake pipe post filter, and if a 3" intake isn't big enough to flow enough air for 150 killerwasps then there are other issues The whole intake is basically the same length as OEM, but it is now about 30% bigger from the airbox back through to the new intake plenum than OEM, and the intake plenum is port matched to the head And the intake is now about 30% bigger than my 2.5" exhaust, so the suck, squeeze, bang and blow black magic should be fine, well, to my uneducated understanding of fluid dynamics anyway Talking the the guys at MX5 Mania, it may even make a few more killerwasps as the intake isn't sucking hot air, especially off idle or when in slow traffic when it would be sucking hot air  As for the difference in IAT, I haven't logged IAT yet, as I don't currently have a OBD2 reader, but I will have a play with my thermal lazer thingie next time I take the car out to sèe how hot stuff gets under the bonnet near the intake filter prior to installing the air box, my "assumption is it has to be much better after the air box is in and sealed up compared to what it is now The aftermarket "performance" CAI elephant in the room: Aftermarket CAI intakes typically have the air filter tucked up behind the bumper, with a 2.5" intake tube (the OEM intake pipe is actually about 30% bigger than the fancy pants "aftermarket" version.....WTF), and you need to remove the bumper to service the filter, which is a PITA Like dis:    
    • soviet_merlin
      Howdy Y'all

      By soviet_merlin · Posted

      Nice one, I'd argue that the white S1 RS260 is certainly the best looking of the Stageas. And yes, fully agree on the forum situation. It's a bit of a shame, but at least SAU is a good place to be. I found the facebook groups to give me FOMO because people were trying to one-up each other and show off in some way. Feels much more natural here. There are people with seriously nice builds, but I can appreciate it rather than it making me question my life choices. Might be that people are more open with sharing how much work/money/suffering it takes to actually get there. 
    • aznriptide859
      Howdy Y'all

      By aznriptide859 · Posted

      Evening, wanted to pop in and finally register to say hi to everyone here on SAU!   It's been a while since I've been active on a forum, but back in the day I used to be relatively active on ClubLexus and other hobby-related forums. I'm glad to see SAU is still around, since with the advent of Facebook and Discord it seems forums aren't what they once were. As a recent new owner of an S1 260RS Stagea, I've found so many older guides and helpful tips from SAU that I figured I needed to join and say a grave thank you. My recent acquisition has only become legal in the US for the past year, and knowing that similar car enthusiasts from across the pond have already figured out the kinks and tricks to get these 25+ year old cars running well. I look forward to diving into more of the SAU forums as well as hopefully contribute some info myself for future posterity.   As a pic tax, here is one of the few good photos I have of my Stagea. I hope to get way more in the future!    
×
×
  • Create New...