Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Worked out a deal with him, I send the CHRA back he fits a new turbine wheel, billet comp wheel, balances and posts back to me for the price of the billet wheel. Not completely satisfied but that's the best Im gonna get out of them..

that is actually a very good outcome! look forward to back to back results with the billet wheel :thumbsup:

Ok so the Troublesome internal gate td06 is now sorted. With a very consistant 14psi low boost made 260kw. And hi boost made an easy 280kw without finding the limits yet. Have a slight issue with the ecu dropping timing at exactly 5000rpm every power pull. Have to study the log file and see why. Rpm and all other signals are fine but it pulls timing for a split 2nd and causes a missfire

But it's not an internal gate turbo anymore :blink:

Clutch is in fellas, feels gooooooood....can be a bit edgey on take off, (trying to drive it with my chunky workboots on was tricky) but after that all is good....very light pedal but when it bites it bites hard... now planting the foot in 2nd is alot more exciting than it was.....

I got a rolling video here for shitsngiggles, soon as i figure out how to get it off my phone :angry:

Anyone else noticed there's funky new emoticons...

being an 18G i would say so, its probably calculated engine power.

still cool tho. if trust can use T3 to T2 adapters id say it works fine. Which would give me confidence to do exactly that and put a 2871 on a RB25. Budget GTRS.

ARTZ what clutch did u get man? i re read 10 pages and couldnt find it. You must have said it in the HG thread...

But it's not an internal gate turbo anymore :blink:

Correct. And he is very annoyed at his wife for making him get the internal gate turbo.

He worked out he spent around 22hours trying to fix the internal gate to perform how it should. Then i gave him a 38mm ebay gate that he welded to the housing. Worked perfectly.

cd9c6028.jpg

Correct. And he is very annoyed at his wife for making him get the internal gate turbo.

He worked out he spent around 22hours trying to fix the internal gate to perform how it should. Then i gave him a 38mm ebay gate that he welded to the housing. Worked perfectly.

cd9c6028.jpg

We all told him

ROFL your secret is as safe with me as mine is with you :ph34r:

Wish I could get my car back to you soon man. Things will be a little tight for a few months, the S13 was our last luxury for a while.

Correct. And he is very annoyed at his wife for making him get the internal gate turbo.

He worked out he spent around 22hours trying to fix the internal gate to perform how it should. Then i gave him a 38mm ebay gate that he welded to the housing. Worked perfectly.

cd9c6028.jpg

Can you do a run with road speed instead of rpm? Are you sure that rpm scale is correct?

Can you do a run with road speed instead of rpm? Are you sure that rpm scale is correct?

Rpm is a roller speed ratio that i have to input rpm It matches the log from the Nistune. When i get back to the shop i will take a pic with roadspeed

Why do u ask?

@ STATUS

Just a quick question. The SR's you have tuned running a kinugawa tdo6sl2-20g are they an 8 or 10cm rear and internal or external gate? I bought the T3 external V band with 8cm rear version and my mate Pete Leibig is tuning it. Just wondering if I should change to the 10cm as I want to reach near on 300rwkw on 98oct and over that on E85.

Thanks

@ STATUS

Just a quick question. The SR's you have tuned running a kinugawa tdo6sl2-20g are they an 8 or 10cm rear and internal or external gate? I bought the T3 external V band with 8cm rear version and my mate Pete Leibig is tuning it. Just wondering if I should change to the 10cm as I want to reach near on 300rwkw on 98oct and over that on E85.

Thanks

i know peter very well, legend. If he wants to talk about it when he has car on dyno let him know he can call me anytime 24/7.

8cm will do it, 10cm will do it easier and lower boost (about 18)i prefer the 8cm.

The internal ones are plain JUNK.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...