Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

lol my bad probably should of checked from page 1 I started reading backwards for 20 pages or so.

lol nws, atleast you can cop the flack.

Page 185 has Simons most recent result, with a direct comparison T67 vs 3076R.. the only difference being the ethanol content of their fuel (but I doubt you need more than the Jew mix simon runs).

You asked your question 2 pages later, within the quoted 20 :P

lol nws, atleast you can cop the flack.

Page 185 has Simons most recent result, with a direct comparison T67 vs 3076R.. the only difference being the ethanol content of their fuel (but I doubt you need more than the Jew mix simon runs).

You asked your question 2 pages later, within the quoted 20 :P

Yeah saw that just brain was lazy and didnt click that the boost was in kpa instead of psi so wasnt making sense until I realised this and converted it lol.

WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! mines anti surge...ive never seen a garrett loose power from anti surge.. :unsure:

TD06 25G anti surge 50mm wastegate. better make me my 300kw on e85...damn kando bastards!

Edited by 51NNA

Well on Dori's car which is a head fck as it has some weird issue's.

It was laggier, and less top end. Wanted to ping at 240kw where as last time it was making 280kw on the edge. Lost 30 kw at 100kph also. Had the exact same surge issue as the non anti surge housing which we think is the profec playing silly buggers with us.

It wasnt until we went for a run on the road that i noticed it hitting the boost warning. Weird thing is the boost warning is set at 26psi and profec isoinly reading 20. So i turned warning up to 33psi and it didnt surge once on the road after that.

We couldnt find a bleed valve lying around as i lent my last one out to another customer during the week.

Only things changed since last tune where anti surge housing and the exhaust leak was fixed (other end of the plumb back pipe for external gate wasnt sealing) but is running screamer

well thats a mystery, I cant say ive ran Kando anti surges before but I have run alot of garrett anti's and the most ive seen is a 1-2kw loss, ill pull my cover off tomorrow and compare it to a garrett thats laying around.

Page 185 has Simons most recent result, with a direct comparison T67 vs 3076R.. the only difference being the ethanol content of their fuel (but I doubt you need more than the Jew mix simon runs)

Not the only difference, Simon's was running a bit more boost too if I remember rightly?

I'm wondering if I will have the same issues with mine then. I got a TD06H 25G with 3" anti surge housing. I',m wondering if I should have gone 4" from what your saying

you should be fine bro, that housing is an actual TD07 MHI spec item

the housing Jez and Dori are having issues with is a 'drilled' TD06 3" cover. The Trust style one that never came with drill holes in it normally lol

its a shame it didnt work though :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...