Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

> open commbank goal saver acc by 28/06/13

> deposit $200 by 11:59pm 26/07/13

> retain balance of $200 by 11:59pm 26/07/13 (not a typo)

> if you have a better savings account, withdraw said money and move to that account

> wait until commbank credit your account by $50 by 19/08/13

> close acc

get awn it

> open commbank goal saver acc by 28/06/13

> deposit $200 by 11:59pm 26/07/13

> retain balance of $200 by 11:59pm 26/07/13 (not a typo)

> if you have a better savings account, withdraw said money and move to that account

> wait until commbank credit your account by $50 by 19/08/13

> close acc

get awn it

This is flawed. For starters I already have a goal saver. Second, it's one of the best non-term deposit interest rates going around. Third, the time my money spends in the new account forgoes potential interest made in the old account. Fourth, interest is calculated daily on this account. For true compounding potential, your deposit should be made at the start of the month.

/triedthisalready

You can have two goal saver accounts brah. From the T&C's : " A maximum of two (2) GoalSaver accounts per customer can be opened. "

Also, feel free to make your account today, and keep it for the entire month to maximise interest... However my $50 is going to be > x days * 0.044 * 200 * 1/12 (not quite correct maths, but for arguments sake)

You'll have to explain this to me in real life lol. I can't see it being of benefit to anyone unless they don't already have a savings account or have one of slightly less interest!

You won't be saying that tomorrow or Friday lol

actually i'm not too bad today... I only jogged 3 km and swam like 100m :P

> open commbank goal saver acc by 28/06/13

> deposit $200 by 11:59pm 26/07/13

> retain balance of $200 by 11:59pm 26/07/13 (not a typo)

> if you have a better savings account, withdraw said money and move to that account

> wait until commbank credit your account by $50 by 19/08/13

> close acc

get awn it

Doesn't this deal also require a minimum of $2k per month deposit (i.e. salary) like most of thier $50 deals

Got overtaken just then by a Hennessy R35 GTR700...sounded so sweet.

$24k for 2 x turbos's and assorted pipes.....

tumblr_ma8pyoxGAT1ruvkrn.gif

got followed by a copper last night... neppean hwy, sat right on my exhaust listening (it's not loud at all and I was driving all @ <3krpm)

for about 2 km, completely ignoring the new BMW 3 series with stupidly loud exhaust absolutely flogging it from every set of lights.

then sat right up my ass and changed lanes (without indicating of course) to stay behind me and followed me all the way through a side street until I turned into dan murphy's where she then cruised off way way under the speed limit.

wtf is this shit...

defecting a virtually stock import is now more important than pulling over an obviously hooning BMW that was breaking traction at every set of lights...

Even I didn't think it was THAT bad... and I hate on everytrhing!

cant wait for the EPA :/

I had a dream last night that I was sitting at a set of traffic lights in the city and someone stood in the middle of the intersection and started popping off shots at people on the sidewalk. So I ran the f**ker over and saved the day.

Then I woke up because the radio/alarm came on, and it was talking about this london shit.

On a related note, why are people in London Rioting and fighting with the police? f**king hell, any excuse over there *shakes head*

got followed by a copper last night... neppean hwy, sat right on my exhaust listening (it's not loud at all and I was driving all @ <3krpm)

for about 2 km, completely ignoring the new BMW 3 series with stupidly loud exhaust absolutely flogging it from every set of lights.

then sat right up my ass and changed lanes (without indicating of course) to stay behind me and followed me all the way through a side street until I turned into dan murphy's where she then cruised off way way under the speed limit.

wtf is this shit...

defecting a virtually stock import is now more important than pulling over an obviously hooning BMW that was breaking traction at every set of lights...

Even I didn't think it was THAT bad... and I hate on everytrhing!

cant wait for the EPA :/

Time to sell then? :P

actually i'm not too bad today... I only jogged 3 km and swam like 100m :P

Doesn't this deal also require a minimum of $2k per month deposit (i.e. salary) like most of thier $50 deals

#f**kcardio :P

Nah pretty sure it doesn't from what I can gather from the T&C's... just a run-of-the-mill normal goal saver account to be opened.

----------------------------

Had a uni test @ 9am...

Now already at home. Agenda: Gyme, tv shows.

Gon be a good day.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...