Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hahahah. i meant the ones by hands... you screw up something early on, and then you need to recalc, look through tables again, and do all sorts of ceebs shiet. even worse interpolating, gah.

else have to matlab or some shiet for non-hand calc ofc. also not a fan :P.

doing a few questions on some airframe loads... iterations done and then READ FROM A GRAPH... initial c_l is like 1.113... after iterations etc you end up with c_l = 1.099, as if you can even read that difference on the shitty resolution graph they give you, all for the "huuuuuuuuuuuuuuge" difference it makes in your final answer...

hahahaha my knowledge of matlab is sketchy at best, i'm pretty good at simulink, but that's all.

you know what's f**ked up? ANSYS.

Don't ever mention ANSYS again! Bringing back my nightmares mang!!!

_TI82107-motore.jpg

tumblr_m3e0nyJ5Qt1r5njkm.png

Yes that's a 156HP @ 183KG naked bike <3

$19,990

New price? If so, not bad for MV Agusta. Of you're going to spend that money, I reckon a Ducati Streetfighter is where it's at.

Or Speed Triple / Z1000 for nearly half the price...

Or a Monster 1100 EVO...

Either way, get another bike and this time make sure it's big and trackable.

sot sure if 1960's rock band........ or 2013 hipsters

i have read the posts.

hamish, rebuild the 991 3.6L and stroke/bore to 4.0L. first world 1% problem solved.

yes but i was thinking I could have the auto one for a daily and the RS 4.0 in manual...

Obviously I will need an RWB 930 track car aswell... I know it's more expensive to do it this was as I will have to buy 3 x prosches but I really do think it's the more logical option

combine reiteration question with

*insert typical engineering problem solving.jpg*

LOL

I would only go to that much effort in an exam. Every other time i'd be just meh. Or use answer from book and work backwards :P

Toby can I claim a bunch of stuff as business startup costs even though business hasn't made any legitimate monies. :P

Ed...actually.dont worry just remembered I don't need to claim anything..

Business startup costs have specific deduction requirements and claims. Its a bit complicated if you plan on doing it yourself.

Still a good idea to claim, so you can carry forward losses. Prob should be registered for GST too if you in losses

Need a big return again this year Tobes, got a lot of concreting to do lol

As long as you got receipts for your claims :P

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...