Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

To be honest, I never really used flex fuel.

Seems good, in the real world once you're on E85 you don't need 98, as the availability is fine unless you're driving to Mildura etc.

That said, flex isn't very hard. All the ECU needs to know is ethanol % which it turns from 0V to 5V.

Then the ECU takes that input which may be like 2.5V, and applies a certain percentage of a correction map to fuel/timing/boost, relative to the voltage of that input.

That's all there is to it

  • Like 1

To be honest, I never really used flex fuel.

Seems good, in the real world once you're on E85 you don't need 98, as the availability is fine unless you're driving to Mildura etc.

That said, flex isn't very hard. All the ECU needs to know is ethanol % which it turns from 0V to 5V.

Then the ECU takes that input which may be like 2.5V, and applies a certain percentage of a correction map to fuel/timing/boost, relative to the voltage of that input.

That's all there is to it

i regularly drive to brissie.

Then I suggest you get a wideband and flex fuel

Wideband because playing with correction maps is likely going to be needed if you want it perfect. Its quite time intensive and expecting it to be PERFECT from a few hours on a dyno will never be feasible.

There's a lot of "hm, I'm idling at 13.7 AFR when I'd like it to be 14.7 when I am on 72% 98 and 28% E85" goings on

then again, can i justify paying 3k or so to make car flex fuel capable? 800$ for injectors, nistune, 1k +-, sensors and stuff, 1k, scotty intake 300?

i'll still run stock turbo.

Running E85 on stock turbo is really not a cost effective/convienient solution

Technically speaking, all E85 does is removes limitations of less than optimal systems, its not like you're gonna slam 30PSI into a stock turbo with a ton of timing for other explodey reasons...

If you could hit MBT and Peak compressor efficiency from your turbo on 98 without it pinging to death, switching to E85 wouldn't give you more power, I've been told that's why some people see big gains from E85 and some people don't

There's still gains to be made from advancing the timing and taking advantage of 107 octane.

Boost will also come on sooner.

But I think if you're spending that much on upgrades you should at the least get an $800 high flow and get another 60-70rwkw out of it while you're there, sacrifice a bit of response given the factory turbo is responsive and linear enough let alone with E85.

Technically speaking though, advancing timing only increases power to a point, after a point it starts reducing power.

If you're not pinging at that point, on 98 well, you don't need E85. It's possible in some lovely systems to not be pinging at MBT.

Same thing re: Boost pressure.

But in the real world, where we do stuff like add turbos to systems designed for lesser turbos, well, E85 starts becoming cool.

Would be curious to see what happens on a stock system, but you aren't gonna run more than 10psi on it anyway.

I would wager youd gain more powars per dollar by upgrading to a hiflow on 98, vs converting to E85 on a stock turbo.

Running E85 on stock turbo is really not a cost effective/convienient solution

Technically speaking, all E85 does is removes limitations of less than optimal systems, its not like you're gonna slam 30PSI into a stock turbo with a ton of timing for other explodey reasons...

If you could hit MBT and Peak compressor efficiency from your turbo on 98 without it pinging to death, switching to E85 wouldn't give you more power, I've been told that's why some people see big gains from E85 and some people don't

There's still gains to be made from advancing the timing and taking advantage of 107 octane.

Boost will also come on sooner.

But I think if you're spending that much on upgrades you should at the least get an $800 high flow and get another 60-70rwkw out of it while you're there, sacrifice a bit of response given the factory turbo is responsive and linear enough let alone with E85.

so. 4k? LOL.

I'm planning on moving to the country, so there will be winton days on 98 and any tracks in city E85

saves me having to do a run down to MELB with jerry cans to do a tampered day.

Planning on going north?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That was the first session so not a lot to take from the day. It was low 20s ambient and the coolant had got to 110 (and obviously had some pressure!) so that still needs to be addressed. I haven't downloaded the data yet but will. I had refilled the auto trans with Redline DT6 because it claimed the best viscosity I could find at 100o. It wasn't really long enough to get a good feel for that; while the trans got to 100o in the session it still wasn't shifting crisply as I hoped. I think I'll try a few more sessions before judging. No steering motor overheat but I'd hope not in only 1 session! But finally the suspension; it was night and day over the standard stuff and the car was a couple of seconds quicker on the same crappy tyres, which is a huge difference. I'll stick with that and get some sway bars and a mechanical diff sorted too and see how that all goes together
    • I guess it’s partially a compromise of how my car is used, wanting to be able to switch from drift to grip with track side on-car adjustment. Also partially with the way the knuckles are set there is more static camber but less dynamic camber gain. 
    • OK, so update from the track day on Friday It was a classic "an unfortunate series of events'. There were a few cars around and when i checked my mirror coming out of the fish hook I notice some smoke from the rear of mine. Looked again and it was getting much worse, I figured I'd blown a turbo or something to got off it and pulled off the racing line. However.... since it is a left hairpin into a right kink, I was on the inside of the next corner. There was a car passing me on the left and a big drop off over the ripple strip on the right......and someone had knocked the witch's hat that was on the apex about 1m onto the track. So, between those 3, I decided to mow down the cone and not damage my car/the other car. Right choice, but surprising result.  The car decided the cone was a small pedestrian so it blew the rear bonnet hinges up to protect their head in the upcoming person to car impact....I didn't see that coming and like an airbag deployment it happened super fast. Straight into the pits from there, everything was driving fine but it became clear it was a coolant leak not smoke, it was billowing up onto the windscreen. Onto the trailer and home. I'll do a separate thread about the repair (once I work out what it is ), but the immediate problem was the bonnet wouldn't open because the front was pinched onto the front bar and would not release. Ultimately we unbolted the hinge from the bonnet, pulled it back a little and it released from the front OK. "There's your problem", the top radiator hose had popped off at the radiator.
    • Yeah that looks like great caster, but I'd suggest trying less front camber some time and seeing if it helps with braking without reducing mid corner speed too much
    • I ended up setting the rear 5mm higher than normal to give some clearance.  My plan is to run the least camber I can in the rear which I think with the extra width is going to need to be -1.75 to -2.00° just to get clearance.  Guards have been rolled and pulled as much as they can/I would be wanting to.  front has the Acostal knuckle with the KPI change and the drop etc. So should be okay with the existing settings I have run with AR1s etc Front: Toe total -2mm(1mm out each side) Caster +7.5° Camber -3.8° Ackerman +15°
×
×
  • Create New...