Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 742
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

lol I probably have spent enough on the car over the years (engines at least) to be there.

It is a good chance to have a beer or 10 with people from all over the place.

Everytime you mention beer, I think slim dusty!

You entering Boxhead?

Probably not although would love to have a crack for the "atmosphere" of it all, kind of one of those events you put on your bucket list to do.

good to see though i kicked this thread back to life :) Bring on August!!!

  • 2 weeks later...

Has the just jap 35 posted any quick times? I haven't heard of any although I think it's a pretty new car.

What Im wondering is-which car will he be driving? Will it be the Just Jap 35 that has raced already in Japan and has posted some quick times according to that article or will it be a different car built here? Havent heard anything about Just Jap building a car here.

umm Just Jap have had a race/rally R35 in the country for about 5 years....if it is still in tarmac rally spec it will be very speed challenged compared to the big $$$ r35s getting around, those regs allow very few changes.

it's definitely the ATTKD Just Jap R35 in Japan. relatively mildly modded to date with the HKS GT800 kit making plenty of power but little chassis mods though I am sure they will be prepping the car beyond what is noted in the articles after chatting with Steve.

It hasn't put any times down on R spec tyres yet as it has been running in the street radial class (not sure what exactly which tyre but it is a Hankook street tyre they have been using).

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/385105-just-jap-racing-time-attack-r35/

umm Just Jap have had a race/rally R35 in the country for about 5 years....if it is still in tarmac rally spec it will be very speed challenged compared to the big $$ r35s getting around, those regs allow very few changes.

I forgot about that car but I was referring to them building a brand new car specifically for time attack.

Read back a few pages. Mark has his finger on the button with most of this stuff it seems.

Cyber EVO had, an EVO. However Cyber EVO are doing a R35, was meant to be 2013 though?!?!?

Whether they are calling it Cyber EVO (as in the team) or not Cyber GTR (with new model in the naming) i do not know.

Steve - If you know more - SPILL :cheers:

Whispering Jack hard!!!

Cyber GTR was suppose to get a full pamper treatment with its engine management. Unfortunately tilton has held them up with a gearbox. So no goer

My car is supposed to get tuned next month but my tuner is not available between 13th to 23rd ..... why? because ill be

in Japan replacing the Power FC and putting a full system in the Cyber EVO instead........ okkkkaaayyy .... coming to WTAC 2012 wooooot woooooot!!!!

:cheers:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...