Jump to content
SAU Community

Safest Way To Tan.


KezR33
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Those you who know me know I'm a pasty pale geek who gets most of his tan from his computer monitor. However this Summer I'm looking to get some colour (I'm not trying to change ethinicity).

My question is, how?

I do not want to burn myself to a crisp, its unhealthy and painful. So should I just head out in the sun topless for 30min per day, or am I better off going out with sunscreen for several hours?

How effective is sunscreen at blocking a tan?

Am I better going out at 12-2pm, or later in the afternoon when the sun is less harsh?

Thanks guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Healthiest way to tan is with fake.

Or be born with dark skin.

Realistically though, just play in the sun all day with sunscreen on...you will still tan a little but won't burn. Or, yes, I've stood in my back yard before, topless, for around 20 minutes each day and this very slowly gives you colour - thus driving arm occurs over time even though your arm doesn't get spontaneously burnt and feel painful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tough situation dude.

Fake tan from a can on a Man is not on I reckon. unless you are on stage in a beauty pagent.

on the other hand, standing in the aussie sun is cancer waiting to happen.

I reckon stay white.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm similar to you, in that I'm white as fark...

But I've picked up some reasonable colour arms and shoulders.

3-4 days over the past 3 weeks been out in the sun for ~90mins with SPF30+ on.

Making sure I don't just stay 'back' to the sun kinda thing. But just rotate

Also was in the water at the time (aspendale beach).

End of the day its not a great tan but I ain't milk white now :)

And fark cancer, everything gives you cancer. Hell I could be hit by a bus in 6 months time.

I don't deliberately roast myself, so if it happens I get cancer so be it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys should try a living in northern Japan where you put away the shorts and t-shirts around mid ~ late Oct and they dont come out of mothballs until June.

Then your covered with snow from late Nov to May.

You guys have never seen white !!

I felt like a vampire hiding from the sun over Xmas and New Year period here in Oz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And fark cancer, everything gives you cancer. Hell I could be hit by a bus in 6 months time.

I don't deliberately roast myself, so if it happens I get cancer so be it.

yeah but if you get hit by a bus it's good bye Ash.

if you get cancer, you will be strung along on my tax money, barely staying alive while feeling and looking like death for who knows how long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the whole skin cancer thing has been blown way out of proportion... sunscreen stops your skin from producing vitamin D so most people are deficient (and its a really good vitamin, look it up)... especially women who use moisturizer every day that has 15+ in it

don't go getting burnt but make sure you get at least 15mins here and there of sun without sunscreen... I always go out without it then put it on after 15min... that's between 11am and 4pm though... if its after 4pm I don't usually bother (have a look at the UV charts)

I'm usually really pale but have managed to get a nice tan this summer without ever getting burnt

my parents never had sunscreen... they used to go out and get badly burnt repeatedly until their skin adapted... now my old man gets his skin checked regularly and has had lots of suspicious moles removed, so there is a happy medium between that and those sickly pale looking kids running around with 500 layers on at the beach and those stupid farking tents people always set up right in front of me!

and I'll leave you with this... there is new research to suggest some sunscreen ingredients might be cancerous

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think that the whole concept of desiring a tan is a cultural-fashion thing?

Isn't it the exact opposite in places like Japan where fair skin is the desired norm?

Sorry about going onto a tangent > but just analysing motive....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It definitely is. I know that 200 years ago you were considered more attractive if you were pale and fat, as it was a sign of wealth. Obviously because almost everyone laboured outdoors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think that the whole concept of desiring a tan is a cultural-fashion thing?

Isn't it the exact opposite in places like Japan where fair skin is the desired norm?

Sorry about going onto a tangent > but just analysing motive....

This is definitely the norm in the older generation but the Japanese would have to be some of the worst offenders I have seen for sunburn.

Hit any popular beach in Japan through summer and the younger generation will be out in droves baking away.

Japanese so called 50+ is useless, just like their fly spray.

I've seen Japanese surfers in Bali and other parts on Indonesia looking like they leprosy with skin peeling off from severe sunburn and yet they'll be out there frying in the sun unprotected again getting burn upon burn because its cool to to look sun tanned and have the surfer girl/boy look.

Absolutely no idea whatsoever when it comes to basic sun protection. At least in oz we are taught from a child to slip,slop slap.

Tell that to a Japanese at the beach and they'll think its some sort of oishi ice cream.

Its the Korean women who wont go near the sun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear oh dear...

That sounds like the group of Slavs that came along and quit smoking last year. I asked a couple of men, "Just like us Asians that prolifically smoke, why do so many Slavs smoke?" They all said, "You're not a man unless you smoke!"

So the corollary for the Korean man is, "You're not a man unless you tan!" ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Healthiest way to tan is with fake.

Or be born with dark skin.

Realistically though, just play in the sun all day with sunscreen on...you will still tan a little but won't burn. Or, yes, I've stood in my back yard before, topless, for around 20 minutes each day and this very slowly gives you colour - thus driving arm occurs over time even though your arm doesn't get spontaneously burnt and feel painful.

singlet tan at the nats. that is all :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 2002 melanomas and other skin cancers caused 0.12% of deaths in the US. That's number 75 down the most-common-way-to-die list.

Check your family history and your skin with a GP and calculate the risk then decide yourself whether it's worth it :)

Definitely tan with sunscreen on, I always use 30SPF and am well brown. There's nothing cool about being a crab person who turns into a Holstein cow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You've done it wrong. I don't have time right now to type up enough. I'll have to come back to it or maybe someone else will in the meantime. The boost signal has to pass through the MAC valve from boost source (turbo outlet - effectively anywhere between the turbo outlet and the throttle body will do, but closer to the turbo outlet is best) to the wastegate. What you have done is connected it sort of like the stock solenoid. But it doesn't work the same way as the stock solenoid. That Tee piece that you have connected the solenoid to....? The solenoid itself serves that function. You should look up a typical MAC valve connection diagram for a single turbo internal wastegate application. You'll find one easily enough. Every single boost controller manufacturer that uses MAC valves will have one. Bugger it, I'll just grab the HP Academy one. The other thing you have to get right is that the boost source has to be connected to the correct port on the solenoid valve. This is because the solenoid makes the valve switch from connecting 2 of the ports when it is unpowered, to connecting one of those first 2 ports to the third port when it is powered. One inlet, two outlets. You will note from the diagram that the common port is port 3, the port to the wastegate is port 2, and port 1 is the vent (where the boost signal escapes when the solenoid pulses ON). As to the BOV.... the vacuum signal for the BOV simply has to come from the plenum. It must register boost when you're on boost and vacuum when the throttle is closed. That's all. The original location on the plenum is best. Best practice is never to interfere with the vacuum line running to the FPR. Just leave that one alone, as you will avoid causing unintended problems that might occur if you mess something up.
    • I was able to complete installation of the G4X ecu. I needed to reroute MAP vacuum signal from stock location to where BOV is connected on the intake plenum. Has anyone needed to do the same? When I connect vac port by the BOV flange to my HKS BOV, it doesnt work and I get flutter. I would to get BOV working, where would it be best to T in? Or would it best for me to move MAP vac line and T into FPR? Secondly, I installed a MAC 3 port boost solenoid and wanted to know if i routed it correctly. I place two lines from stock boost solenoid and placed it on ports 1 and 2, leaving 3 vented. The T for wastegate and boost source on compressor elbow is on port 2, and port 1 is connected to turbo inlet intake pipe. Please see attached pictures. Ill upload ecu config later today. Thanks in advance.
    • some people are still around weirdly enough - most people just use facebook now to ask the same 12 questions tho XD  
    • Omg Rezz! Yep we're still here and actually seeing a trickle of oldies coming back.  How's things? 
    • So I raised the car up a fair bit for shipping - see image - then lowered it again when it arrived. I then rushed to get an alignment in NL before the track and the shop just wasn’t anywhere near as precise as what I got in Japan. The guys that did the alignment this week said there was a fair amount of toe in the rear that could have contributed to the understeer. It was also the case that the rear camber went from about -2 to -3 at the shop in NL. However, since I’ve now got slightly wider tires in the rear - NS2Rs run wider than Accelera 651S - I could only get a minimum of -3 in the rear now due to clearance. Front is now -2.75 (-2.45 in minutes) due to being raised a bit (previously -3 in JP). So it’s likely a combination of the two factors, camber and toe. The issue now is I have more camber in the rear than the front and the next step on the front Cusco arms will put me at -3.5ish front which seems a bit excessive to me. The weird thing is I’ve never had any understeer at the track in Japan but they are very different circuits - Japanese circuits are much slower than the one I’ve been to here.    I’m probably going to have to start another thread for the E90. The plan is sort of to keep it as a daily but progressively mod it into a track car - honestly, you need a cage for the sort of speeds you go here. Just ordered the M3 front arms btw.  Love the car despite it being in pretty shitty condition. Oil analysis came back okay and it seems to have stopped consuming oil since fixing a load of engine bay things. Saw yours is a 335i right? f**king mistake on my part getting the DI N53 over the N52, fuel economy is insanely good though at 14-16 km/L.   Cheers, it’s great to see the benefits and pitfalls of different places. I’m contemplating going back to the U.K. around next year as the cost of living in the Netherlands is just ridiculous. GF is nagging me to settle and buy a house but I don’t know what LSD to buy. 
×
×
  • Create New...