Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For every ones info. I replaced the V Spec II sticker on my car, with a genuine Nissan sticker. It was super expensive, but aside from that, the sticker is shaped to match the corner of the back boot like a template. This means that you can use the corners and edges of the boots to get the sticker in the exact factory position. Pretty sweet. I was surprised.

Just checked my spare sticker (my original is just showing a tiny amount of peel on one corner....) - you are right - how clever of them......

Cheers

The Baron

PS That Edward Lee Video should be pinned somewhere as a "must see" for anyone who ever considers buying a car from that guy, with annotations about all the misleading statements.......

Good luck this weekend Bob! :D At the very least I'm sure you will have fun!

Yep had fun but my times were ..........OK????????

My best 1/4 mile was 13.399 (slip attached) but my best terminal speed was 178.94 kph a couple of runs later (111mph).

With that speed I should have been well into the 12's but my 0-30' times are horrible.

I just can get it off the line. I tried it in 2WD mode by pulling the fuse but that was worse!!!!!!

I just sat there and smoked the tyres. :closedeyes::closedeyes::closedeyes::closedeyes::closedeyes:

Anyway, I flogged a few of my mates in stock HSV's and GT Falcons (mid to low 14"s)!

Cheers,

Bob.

post-78207-0-53167100-1403937609_thumb.jpg

Its all in tyre pressure Bob. Need to be 15psi from memory, can't remember exactly but it's a super low pressure.

Once that is set, 2nd gear burn out in rwd mode then flick to awd, on the limiter and release the clutch...when it hooks up you will be shocked what g's these cars can pull on take off.

Mine did a flat 13 when it was stock as a rock...won't get much better than that although I've heard they run a PB 12.8

Thanks Marko,

Modern Motor (April 1990 issue) ran a 13.1 stock........ That's the best I've seen in any publication. Most run around 13.7.

My tyres were set at 27psi for the fronts and 22 psi for the rears...... Guess I stuffed up on that one.

I normally run them at 34 and 30 on the road.

Was pleased with the terminal speed though.

Bob.

At 111mph it's not stock and probably making closer to 270kw at the wheels and should be doing flat 12s or even into the 11s

100% correct........ Unigroup dyno'd it at 271.6 rwkw.

Bob.

what is not stock on the car Bob?

Bar the exhaust, (3.5" front Pipe, 3" Hi Flow Cat, 3.25 Rear pipe, 3 and Hiflow rear muffler) everything you CAN'T see.......

  • Nistune
  • Sard 720cc injectors
  • Lager Walbro fuel pump
  • HKS Boost Controller
  • Splitfire coils
  • Excedy HD Clutch

Bob.

Bar the exhaust, (3.5" front Pipe, 3" Hi Flow Cat, 3.25 Rear pipe, 3 and Hiflow rear muffler) everything you CAN'T see.......

  • Nistune
  • Sard 720cc injectors
  • Lager Walbro fuel pump
  • HKS Boost Controller
  • Splitfire coils
  • Excedy HD Clutch
Bob.
nice. The Walbro pump is not to noisy?

nice. The Walbro pump is not to noisy?

No....... The exhaust must drone it out!

A mate of mine had a Brock Commodore VK Group A that was tricked up with a Walbro pump and that was horrendously noisy so I know what you mean.

Bob.

Yep had fun but my times were ..........OK????????

My best 1/4 mile was 13.399 (slip attached) but my best terminal speed was 178.94 kph a couple of runs later (111mph).

With that speed I should have been well into the 12's but my 0-30' times are horrible.

I just can get it off the line. I tried it in 2WD mode by pulling the fuse but that was worse!!!!!!

I just sat there and smoked the tyres. :closedeyes::closedeyes::closedeyes::closedeyes::closedeyes:

Anyway, I flogged a few of my mates in stock HSV's and GT Falcons (mid to low 14"s)!

Cheers,

Bob.

That's still very respectable, and at least you had fun... that's the main part!

How were you launching the car Bob? These things need a little tough love from the start line, you might feel bad in doing it but it's what she's made for :) There's absolutely more to be had from your car, your 60 foot time of 2.1s could come down to 1.6 to 1.8 seconds with a bit of practice - I'm not a drag racing expert by any stretch of the imagination but that little bit shaved off the front end often seems to translate to a larger amount shaved off at the other end.

Well done in any event, at least you came out the winner against the HSVs and FPVs! :)

  • 1 month later...

So just an update on my gtr,

Installed new timing belt, HKS cam gears, water pump etc,

Bought a power fc and some hks 550cc injectors.

I had a second hand apexi avcr so I just used the boost solenoid and wiring and converted it to my power fc.

Got the car back from the tuner today and made 265kw's on 1.1bar boost!

Pretty happy and the car feels a hell of alot more alive than before!

post-90998-0-26142400-1406888757_thumb.jpg

  • 3 weeks later...

Hey guys,

I've been off sau for a year or two. Sure we used to have another rare register with a good record of vpsecs and n1s? I'm probably just lost tho, lol.

Anyway adding for the community, in Brisbane with a 1994 Vspec II N1. Unfortunately not very standard! :-)

Cheers

Michael

Fortunately, Australia has acquired 2x BNR32 V-Spec II N1 in recent times.

Congratulations to you Michael as well.

We'd like to grab them before Canada's timeline permits...

Last six digits on mine are -311603

Terry-36_zpsc2e1370c.jpg

It's still awaiting compliance.

  • Like 2

Fortunately, Australia has acquired 2x BNR32 V-Spec II N1 in recent times.

Congratulations to you Michael as well.

We'd like to grab them before Canada's timeline permits...

Last six digits on mine are -311603

Terry-36_zpsc2e1370c.jpg

It's still awaiting compliance.

is that a genuine N1 Terry?

Car looks very nice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...