Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Coated I bet, they rust out from the inside anyway. Try fabricating a bare steel system without a coating on the inside and see how long it lasts. You would need to factor in the coating costs to compare them properly. E85 will limit it's life even more.

I don't need other people to tell me anything btw, I remove so many rusty shitty mild systems and replace them with my custom stainless, the piles of old pipes are leaving stains on my concrete. Do you want some? You are welcome to them.

Your choice at the end of the day, I hate seeing rusty shit under my car. I guess if your ride is devaluing to nothing then a few hunge is not worth wasting on it.

ummm how often are you under your car! :woot:

  • 1 month later...

Kirawee Mufflers stuck a 20" long oval on the back of my 25T , I can't remember the depth and width but it is really quiet . It's an off the shelf Redback from memory available in 3 and 3.5" straight through . The Nismo rear can that was removed is larger area wise and I wonder if it can be gutted and rebuilt to keep the really big for an R33 can volume .

A .

The muffler is 7" diam. and 500 mm long. It might be a little squeezy in the length department. If so it will be reduced. The bigger the muffler is the quieter it will be without hp loss. It is fitted ith a 409 s.s. perforated tube. It is packed with a mixture of stranded fibre-glass and inox which gives it a higher temp. rating.It has a quieter, deeper sound. If the muffler was intended for circuit racing the fibre-glass would be discarded and replaced with gtb or inox. The perforated tube also has an expansion joint to stop metal fatigue when hot. The resonator is 4.5" diam. and 400 mm long. It has same perforated tube and packed with inox.

well i finshed my twin 3inch into 4inch yesty.

the mufflers are perfect, its quite as for the size of system and heaps of ground clearance........ plus it looks tuffffff as nails.

heres a pic, enjoy.

thanks for the mufflers AES nice work!!!!

post-16000-0-87082400-1400292042_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
    • OK, if it idles at 1000+ with the AAC, its not an idle airflow problem. The cold start valve just gives extra air when the engine is cold, but you have enough air without it to idle at 1000. I think you are back to a fuel problem, sorry. Can you see the fuel pressure staying constant or does it drop as the revs drop to a stall?  
×
×
  • Create New...