Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just gave NRMA VC a call and the woman says they changed their policy a couple of months ago and no longer consider skylines to be a collectible :-S ( I did mention I had a 94 R32 GTR to insure )

Anyone else been advised of this ?

I would try again, it seems at times the person answering the phone might not know what they are talking about BUT maybe they did, I renewed mine at the end of January, SO ?

But there have been blokes on SAU that were told no and followed some advice and tried again and got the R insured, best of luck.

I would think that any of the R32/3/4 GTRs will be collectables

  • Like 1

I would try again, it seems at times the person answering the phone might not know what they are talking about BUT maybe they did, I renewed mine at the end of January, SO ?

But there have been blokes on SAU that were told no and followed some advice and tried again and got the R insured, best of luck.

I would think that any of the R32/3/4 GTRs will be collectables

I'll try again soon and see if I get someone who knows what they are on about.

Ok finally got someone who knew about their job...

Stored in a lock up garage

$60,000 agreed value

$879 premium

$300 excess

Asked about how they measure the days spent driving and he said it was just based on an honesty system.

Result!

Edited by GRKGTR
  • Like 4

Ok finally got someone who knew about their job...

Stored in a lock up garage

$60,000 agreed value

$879 premium

$300 excess

Asked about how they measure the days spent driving and he said it was just based on an honesty system.

Result!

There you go, all good, worth another call or 2 or 3 or 4 , lol

  • Like 1

Asked about how they measure the days spent driving and he said it was just based on an honesty system.

Good to see you got it insured Mike.

Re their advice that it's an honesty system, when I insured mine a while back with another company that also had a limitation on use I was told that in the event of a claim the insured's version of usage would be verified with workmates, car club members, housemates, relatives, partners etc.

My experience with insurance companies and their investigators, albeit limited, is that if the claim is significant they will go to considerable lengths to see if there are reasons upon which the claim could be questioned. Just saying...

Edited by Scooby

Good to see you got it insured Mike.

Re their advice that it's an honesty system, when I insured mine a while back with another company that also had a limitation on use I was told that in the event of a claim the insured's version of usage would be verified with workmates, car club members, housemates, relatives, partners etc.

My experience with insurance companies and their investigators, albeit limited, is that if the claim is significant they will go to considerable lengths to see if there are reasons upon which the claim could be questioned. Just saying...

Year , it is all a bit iffy if you ask me.

At least with the 9000klm you could could photo your usage or something similar. And if you wanted to cheat a little , we know who to get to wind them back a 1000klms or 2 or 50k, initials PL , LOL

I'm going to ring them at some point next week and try snd get written confirmation on what they classify as a drive event

I asked about this and the guy said the car is insured whether I go on a cruise with a club or any other event (on public roads of course).. So would be good to get something in writing to confirm.

  • Like 1

I asked about this and the guy said the car is insured whether I go on a cruise with a club or any other event (on public roads of course).. So would be good to get something in writing to confirm.

From what I was told, the car is insured on all normal driving situations if you adhere to their policy requirements and not be charged with braking the road rules that caused you to claim on the accident, like neg driving, DUI etc

Driving too and from the track is OK, not track work of any kind. Hooning , nah , no way , bye bye R, lol

So , as I understand it, driving on a day out with like minded car owners and driving within the road rules is OK , how could it not be acceptable ??

  • Like 1

I asked about this and the guy said the car is insured whether I go on a cruise with a club or any other event (on public roads of course).. So would be good to get something in writing to confirm.

Written Interpretation will be good yes.

One of the NSW Execs last year, also got a verbal saying that a Club Cruise constitutes a Drive Day.

I think there is too much worries going on here.

I would like to hear from someone who has actually made a claim....

I don't think you would have dramas if your a good honest customer.

I have only had to make one claim, years ago now with just car. They were great I had no issues at all.

I think you only have something to worry about if your doing something wrong.

I asked about this and the guy said the car is insured whether I go on a cruise with a club or any other event (on public roads of course).. So would be good to get something in writing to confirm.

exactly, cause you know if it's not in writing they'll change their mind as soon as you make a claim

I think there is too much worries going on here.

I would like to hear from someone who has actually made a claim....

I don't think you would have dramas if your a good honest customer.

I have only had to make one claim, years ago now with just car. They were great I had no issues at all.

I think you only have something to worry about if your doing something wrong.

Maybe you are right, but it is better to know the policy of a company before you have a prang, too late after :(

It's also about nailing down spurious terms like 'honesty system' (sounds too good to be true) so that you're prepared when you make a claim and they ask you to prove your version of events, which they WILL do if the claim is sizeable. I had a vehicle stolen from a workshop while I was several hundred k's away and while the police were satisfied with my version of events the insurance investigator wanted a substantiated alibi to prove that I didn't take my own car for a joyride and smash it. Sounds incredible but behaviours from people trying to cheat a system can be amazing.

Sales people who've maybe never lodged a serious claim themselves and are trying to sell you a product by using terms like 'honesty system' to explain away serious and legit questions, instead of looking into it further, do no one any favours. It could be widely interpreted by inexperienced policy holders in particular to mean that the insurer will just accept the insured's version of events, which is totally misleading and leaves the insured - no matter how honest - unprepared for the investigation. Insurance fraud is significant so there's unlikely to be a unique 'honesty system' here beyond what's implicit in all insurance claims.

This seems like a great product and it's obviously helped our community so I'm all for it. But for what it's worth I'd suggest tackling them a bit on what 'honesty system' means in terms of their response to a claim and I'd bet that if asked to put something in writing there'd be some rapid backing away. It's worth being prepared particularly when taking out a policy that has conditions as an insurance investigation is inevitable in the case of a large claim. Anyone who thinks they might come close to the limit of usage should protect themselves and not have to go through grief when things get serious; although it's a pita simple things like filling in a $5 vehicle usage log book from the newsagent, and keeping date stamped photos of the car at events etc can help quite a lot.

Edited by Scooby
  • Like 5

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...