Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There will be a certain amount of wobble in the rotor itself and a certain amount in the hub etc. The idea is to put them together so that they cancel each other out rather than re-inforce each other, is all. If there's not a lot of run out in either, then you won't see much in any orientation. If there's a lot of runout in one but none in the other, then again, it won't matter which way you put them together. If they each have some runout, then minimising is better than maximising.

You need to use a dial indicator for this. I think that the standard allowance is 0.1mm (0.004" for us old blokes). You won't pick that up by eye.

It's a good practice, as it will tell you whether there's any crap / high spots under your rotor. I've found that what looked like a clean mounting surface had small metal filings on it, giving runout. After a bit of cleaning I got it to within the spec pretty easily

I know that a lot of people don't bother with this, but like anything, done properly it is just another way to eliminate possible problems down the track.

  • Like 1

Rotors and pads are in, so far so good. I'll get the lines and fluid done at a shop next week so they can double check the torque of the bolts etc.

I put all the shims back in exactly as they were after a good clean, they were filthy. I had baked my previous pads (Intima SS) pretty well and the inner shims were stuck on... They're still not pretty even after the clean - see below - do you reckon I should get a new set? If so, where?

15563346182_2f6095c7a6_n.jpg

14942332023_4cc1ab94f8_n.jpg

15538795596_243decdf25_n.jpg

A good spray with anti-squeal goo and they'll probably be fine.

Thanks. I put them in as is, so far there's no squeal in the first 30 kms or so, during or after the bedding procedure.

The main thing I was wondering is if the corroded surface will cause slightly uneven pressure on the pad but it's probably fine.

A1RM and track don't mix, I had massive brake fade by the 3rd lap at Wakefield Park and subsequently came off the track.

A daily and very light track work mad I suggest is Intima SR. Quiet, and outperformed the QFM pads for thr same price.

For a car that never hits the track I don't see any need for slotted rotors, master cylinder stoppers or braided brake lines.

Good stock rotors, fresh fluid and decent pads are all you need.

I find people go a little all out for just a street car, understand some like it but sometimes I see a thread like this pop up and people bag out the stock brakes and go full retard not half retard on correcting a problem which wasn't a problem to begin with.

Just my input :)

  • Like 1

I recently went for a drive in the high country and it appears that the stock brakes on my GTT can't quite match 275rwkw, surprise.

Not sure if that statement is valid... I have a R33 with smaller brake rotors @ 296mm vs. yours which are 310mm.. Caliper wise we are the same and power wise I'm about 340kW.

My brakes are stock, my rotors are stock, my brake lines are stock, don't have any master cylinder stropper and they seem fine on all road conditions, even on the track they're fine up to about lap 6/7 that's when they fade.

In my opinion, poor braking is due to these things (at a high level):

  • Poor pad choice
  • Old fluid
  • Crappy tyres
  • Poor suspension setup, i.e. no weight transfer from stupidly stiff springs and/or poor damper choice/settings

Not sure if that statement is valid... I have a R33 with smaller brake rotors @ 296mm vs. yours which are 310mm.. Caliper wise we are the same and power wise I'm about 340kW.

My brakes are stock, my rotors are stock, my brake lines are stock, don't have any master cylinder stropper and they seem fine on all road conditions, even on the track they're fine up to about lap 6/7 that's when they fade.

In my opinion, poor braking is due to these things (at a high level):

  • Poor pad choice
  • Old fluid
  • Crappy tyres
  • Poor suspension setup, i.e. no weight transfer from stupidly stiff springs and/or poor damper choice/settings

I had original rotors with heaps of meat, relatively fresh fluid, good new tyres and good suspension setup. The pads however were completely baked after that drive (Intima SS). The brakes faded severely during the run and I also got quite a bit of vibration that I'm guessing was from the pads having caked onto the rotors. The vibration went away later in normal driving.

I'm getting the lines done today and the new setup will be complete, will report back on how it goes.

Try removing the backing plates. 90% of people find a far nicer pedal as the old backing plates take up that little bit of early pedal travel compressing them more than you actually get in pad travel to stop the car. So result in often a spongy pedal

A1RM and track don't mix, I had massive brake fade by the 3rd lap at Wakefield Park and subsequently came off the track.

Over-generalised statement is over-generalised. A1RMs were fine for me doing 1:11s at wakie. How much pad you need depends on many things. eg: power, weight, brake size, brake cooling, cornering ability, driving style etc etc. Sure, A1RMs are a crossover pad (that is, between a street and a track pad), but if that's all you need they will work well.

Over-generalised statement is over-generalised. A1RMs were fine for me doing 1:11s at wakie. How much pad you need depends on many things. eg: power, weight, brake size, brake cooling, cornering ability, driving style etc etc. Sure, A1RMs are a crossover pad (that is, between a street and a track pad), but if that's all you need they will work well.

You sound offended, I apologise if I've offended you - however my intent was not to.

I am speaking from experience, also my close mates all have had the same experience as I have.

  • Like 1

You sound offended, I apologise if I've offended you - however my intent was not to.

I am speaking from experience, also my close mates all have had the same experience as I have.

Nah, not offended just offering my experience. I see you have 340kw + 296mm rotors so you're pushing your brakes hard. Makes sense you'll need a full track pad with that combo. I'm 305kw + the 330mm chinese kit + UAS air deflectors, so dont need as much pad.

I have the A1RMs alround on my 34 and did 8 laps of EC South before the fuel got hot and had to come off, but brakes where still going fine, but that's with 6 piston APs on a 355mm disc up front and 4 piston APs on a 343mm disc out back

I've used A1RMs on the track with good results too. I've never had them fade while on the track, and that was down to a 1:07 at wakie. Eastern Creek was much harder on brakes, but they still did fine. Would I smash out 8 laps on them? No.

I pulled them out and didn't like the look of them. Coming away from the backing, and big chunks coming out/away. Went to the Winmax W5 which I haven't had the chance to try out yet.

I think it very much depends on the longitudinal grip you can generate from your tyres. More grip they generate, the harder the brakes can work.

Had the following setup for a local track day -

- T3 Slotted Rotors F+R

- Braided Lines

- Nulon Dot 4 Fluid

- A1RM Pads

Couldn't be happier, no brake fade whatsoever but it wasn't a very fast circuit. Would recommend!

  • Like 1

Just in case anyone else is looking to do this, here's the cost breakdown including delivery (late 2014):

  • $662 - DBA T3 4000 Club Spec slotted rotors (Vic Performance Parts on eBay)
  • $164 - Remsa pads (GSL RallySport)
  • $178.45 - HEL braided lines (HEL on eBay)
  • $70 - Brake master cylinder stopper (Gumtree)
  • $17.96 - 2 x Nulon Xtreme Performance Super Dot 4 fluid (SuperCheap Auto)

Total $1,092.41 plus labour to fit braided lines and change fluid (I wanted to leave that to the experts). Not too bad for brake improvement on a budget.

  • 1 month later...

Re the anti-squeal shims, the ones on my GTR have two thin plates which sort of clip together, whereas i notice in your pix there's only one. So, GTT owners, should he have one or two plates per pad?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...