Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Duncan said:

No, none of our classes allow E85, and yes I check it regularly (every engine change)

Huh, you are driving a Subaru now? :D

Or maybe it is you who is driving up RB prices...

  • Haha 1
25 minutes ago, Duncan said:

No, none of our classes allow E85, and yes I check it regularly (every engine change) and there has been no deterioration, just a bit of discolouration

I hope you mean engine oil change haha

14 minutes ago, soviet_merlin said:

Huh, you are driving a Subaru now? :D

Or maybe it is you who is driving up RB prices...

 

2 minutes ago, CRSKmD said:

I hope you mean engine oil change haha

I didn't mis-type

  • Sad 2
27 minutes ago, Duncan said:

Indeed, it is much easier to get at the filter with the engine on a stand

You don't need to lean as far to pour the oil in, or change the spark plugs either 😛

  • Haha 1
On 3/11/2025 at 3:56 PM, MBS206 said:

You don't need to lean as far to pour the oil in, or change the spark plugs either 😛

the ergonomics are real

  • Haha 1

I made a little more progress last night and added some E85 safe fuel tank baffle foam in behind the stock cam cover baffle plate. 

It still feels really wrong shoving foam inside the engine but apparently its fine based on it pretty much being the MINES/Hi-Octane RB26 cam baffle kit and the few posts here I have found of people doing it and the lack of posts saying the foam broke down and ruined the motor... Still plan to check it frequently though lol

96vpPOw.jpeg

GD37VCB.jpeg

The last step for this round of oil control modifications I plan to make is to add some -12AN fittings to the cam covers and connect them to some (already existing luckily) -12AN fittings on the sump. Basically a sudo head drain/sump breather/pressure equaliser without having to remove the motor and do the one on the rear of the head.

My plan is to add them to either the tops or the sides of the cam covers at the back. unless there is a compelling reason to have them at the front on the sides which i have seen a few times though they were all on RB26 cam covers from memory so that may be due to the stock breathers being on the back and the integral baffle being different ?

QBgtXpZ.png

 

 

It won't likely matter where along the cam covers you put the big fittings. I would suggest putting them on the sides if you can, simply because it will reduce the flow up through the baffles and thus reduce the amount of oil that gets put into the foam. It might not matter, but it seems like something to consider as a worthwhile thing to avoid.

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

It won't likely matter where along the cam covers you put the big fittings. I would suggest putting them on the sides if you can, simply because it will reduce the flow up through the baffles and thus reduce the amount of oil that gets put into the foam. It might not matter, but it seems like something to consider as a worthwhile thing to avoid.

That's a good point. The rears of the covers themselves have no baffling at all though.
Higher up more chance of air for venting the crank case. Lower on the side more likely to be submerged.

I might be able to fit them on the sides but with both the sump drain fittings being on the drivers side the passenger one will need to make a U Turn and be nearer the turbo. But it will look neat being not up on top.

Edited by CRSKmD

If you do go with drain back, make sure everything is foam or wool filled so it actually does something, and ensure there is a screen somewhere in the drain to catch anything that comes loose from the packing. I don't drain back

There's a Vic drifter who has a vid on YouTube where he does some head drains like your setup, and gets them in some good spots and it also stops the potential for oil pooling in the hose and reducing its effective diameter.

2 minutes ago, MBS206 said:

There's a Vic drifter who has a vid on YouTube where he does some head drains like your setup, and gets them in some good spots and it also stops the potential for oil pooling in the hose and reducing its effective diameter.

Cam Marton or something?

Getting holes drilled into to cam covers and AN10 fitting welded on.
My sump has 2x AN10 fittings on it already.
These are the options I have come up with that can be done without needing to remove the sump to add more fittings.

In all options front of passenger side cover connects to VCT head drain bung (i know this isn't the best spot but my feeling is it must do something).

Option 1 (pink). The back of each cam covers gets its own line to sump.
GYrOn8e.png

Option 2 (blue). The back of each cam covers are linked and share a line to sump. The front of drivers side gets its own line.
ZTl1Kwx.png

Option 3 (Black). Drivers side are Tee'd together and share a line to the sump. Passenger side rear gets its one line to the sump.
pwdBwLL.png

I dunno. I think any one of those from each side to sump is probably enough. Remember - this is about creating a path for gas flow up from the sump to the cam covers. That gas flow then has to leave via the lines to the catch can. There's probably little point in providing 100% more capacity from sump up to covers cf. what you have from there to the catch can.

Put in the 3 convenient ones? Any which way that you see fit. That'd be my thoughts.

My plan is to go the pink option. But still add the 4th fitting near the oil cap and just cap it off for now. 
That way I can add 2 extra to the sump and have 4 dedicated breathers/drains if I ever remove the sump for any reason. 

Realistically, if you're trying to give airflow up from the sump, to the breathers, and then that excess will vent through the catchcan, skip the cam covers, and take sump straight to the catch can.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...